Queen in Lesbian Bondage Shocker

Q

Queen& 09 March 2005 14:10 · Member since January 2005

written_in_the_stars wrote:
Inu Yasha (a.k.a. Lum's Stormtrooper) wrote:
I think it should be taken off this website

I agree... it is porn

its not porn its just a bit of minge thats all

L

Lisser 09 March 2005 14:27 · Member since January 2004

written_in_the_stars wrote:
Bohardy wrote:
Before you continue any further on your little moral crusade Dark, I thought I'd provide you with some more evidence of the shameful pornography that sullies the othewise puritan haven that is Queenzone.

Behold the filth!

http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/mp3.aspx?Q=9913
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/mp3.aspx?Q=9572
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/mp3.aspx?Q=7201

Lets look at the combined total of pornography (or almost pornography) instances so far, shall we?

Can almost see: About 22 tits and about 8 vaginas.
Can actually see: About 25 tits, 2 complete sets of female buttocks.

And I fear that's just the tip of the iceberg. I'm sure there's a fuller picture of the Jazz poster for starters.

Have you heard of the photograph Spencer Tunick ? He photographs hundreds of nude bodies laying on the ground. And it isn't porn - it is ART. It's the same thing for the Jazz poster, it has nothing to do with porn ... It's only naked girls riding bikes - I see it as art. It shouldn't shock anyone. But the picture we are talking about is showing girls in an obscene position - THAT is porn.

LOL..you haven't seen porn then bc this isn't porn.

B

Banquo 09 March 2005 15:20 · Member since July 2001

ryancoke wrote:
Banquo wrote:
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/mp3.aspx?Q=10005

Tie your mother down indeed. I'm lost for words.

How about "that turns me on"?

Because, however small, I can see John Deacon's face staring out at me. That'll put anyone off.

M

Mean Mistreater 09 March 2005 19:06 · Member since July 2004

Banquo wrote:
ryancoke wrote:
Banquo wrote:
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/mp3.aspx?Q=10005

Tie your mother down indeed. I'm lost for words.

How about "that turns me on"?

Because, however small, I can see John Deacon's face staring out at me. That'll put anyone off.

LMAO!!!!

W

Winter Land Man 21 October 2008 01:11 · Member since August 2005

inu-liger wrote:

wstüssyb wrote:

what you getting all worked up about this dark, didnt you say sometime ago about you preforming oral sex on your self or something like that?

No, I didn't. You're probably thinking of Baer or Britt.

Liar. Wstussyb, knows the truth!

W

Winter Land Man 21 October 2008 01:12 · Member since August 2005

wstüssyb wrote:

pretty sure i asked dark if he did that and he said yes
I still remember Janet asking the topic to go no further.

Spot on!

I

inu-liger 21 October 2008 01:32 · Member since July 2001

Jake, you're a sick fucking creep.

P

P-Staker 21 October 2008 08:39 · Member since April 2008

inu-liger wrote:

Honestly, I think it should be taken, as at the least, it comes CLOSE to being pornography, because you can ALMOST see that girl's vagina.

This should, again, be taken down.

Oh, no, not a VAGINA!!! I mean, what would Jakob Ammann say?!

P

P-Staker 21 October 2008 08:40 · Member since April 2008

inu-liger wrote:

Jake, you're a sick fucking creep.

Wow! Good thing you used "fucking" as an insult and not to refer to sex, because that would've been offensive.

I

its_a_hard_life 26994 21 October 2008 10:46 · Member since November 2005

Hot lesbians, mmmmm.

Gimme some of thaaaaaaaaataaaaa!

xD [img=/images/smiley/msn/shades_smile.gif][/img]

P

Penetration_Guru 21 October 2008 16:49 · Member since July 2001

inu-liger wrote:

Jake, you're a sick fucking creep.

There speaks an expert....

I

inu-liger 21 October 2008 22:08 · Member since July 2001

Penetration_Guru wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

Jake, you're a sick fucking creep.

There speaks an expert....

O RLY

:-P

I

inu-liger 21 October 2008 22:09 · Member since July 2001

P-Staker wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

Honestly, I think it should be taken, as at the least, it comes CLOSE to being pornography, because you can ALMOST see that girl's vagina.

This should, again, be taken down.

Oh, no, not a VAGINA!!! I mean, what would Jakob Ammann say?!

I don't know what the hell I was thinking then......... -.-'
Surely wasn't smoking some of 'that', I'll tell you that much!

Btw. isn't Jakob Ammann a pro drummer?
That name rings a bell...

W

Winter Land Man 21 October 2008 22:19 · Member since August 2005

inu-liger wrote:

Penetration_Guru wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

Jake, you're a sick fucking creep.

There speaks an expert....

O RLY

:-P

He was making fun of you, I think.

W

Winter Land Man 21 October 2008 22:20 · Member since August 2005

inu-liger wrote:

P-Staker wrote:

inu-liger wrote:

Honestly, I think it should be taken, as at the least, it comes CLOSE to being pornography, because you can ALMOST see that girl's vagina.

This should, again, be taken down.

Oh, no, not a VAGINA!!! I mean, what would Jakob Ammann say?!

I don't know what the hell I was thinking then......... -.-'
Surely wasn't smoking some of 'that', I'll tell you that much!

Btw. isn't Jakob Ammann a pro drummer?
That name rings a bell...

At the same time this thread was made, you were admitting to having a big porno collection.

Posts in chronological order