Negative Creep: "He CHOSE to answer the dumbass questions... it would seem he doesn't have the AUTHORITY to comment on what he did for QP. I'm sure he got many questions regarding the archives but simply didn't answer them."
Your comment regarding authority is a very valid and well made point. However, this is the SAME person who e-mailed Dark an MP3 copy of the (still) unreleased BBC version of "March Of The Black Queen"). So where did the AUTHORITY for THAT come from?
Greg is in a very priviledged position, and I would love for him to reply to this mail (or any other internet forum) and provide some SERIOUS insight into some new and meaningful discussion, rather than the inane banter which even "Queenonline" have become fed up with.
Greg's Q & A
http://forums.queenonline.com/viewtopic.php?t=2294
Surely answering a couple of interesting questions from time to time is not as "serious a breech of confidentiality" as passing unreleased tracks over the internet?
We all know that if Greg WANTED to engage seriously with other fans - he could.
Even if he REFUSED to engage with other fans - I would still find that position respectful.
However; (and I make no bones about it - this is where we do cross swords) the sad thing is the way HOW he flippantly enagages with other fans which gets my heckles up.
(Hey, at least I am honest!)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
sorry for this.
trust me I dont intend to ask him a stupid question,anyone who has read my posts on queenzone will understand that. I apologise for causing any "tiff" between qz members...but I know half the time you dont need a reason;)
trust me I dont intend to ask him a stupid question,anyone who has read my posts on queenzone will understand that. I apologise for causing any "tiff" between qz members...but I know half the time you dont need a reason;)