Queen crest Queenzone.org

Larry Lurex

20 posts Page 2 of 2
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
B
XcessQueen wrote:
I payed for it half of croatian average month pay! And I'm unemployed! So tell me that I'm not the biggest living Queen fan! :))


i dunno - how much do you weigh?

i'm only 13st 8lb - so i know i CAN'T be the biggest queen fan
go deo na hÉireann The best QZ epoch: BG17-00 (Before Gerry 1996-2013)
X
Being fat and HEAVY is one category; being BIG (or in my case - the biggest) is completely different category. :) You must first learn your lessons, and then talk to strangers.
A
MP3 is not a bad thing and doesn't need to be heard on anything other than a decent set of headphones. How do you think the zoners decided what they thought on the 2001 remasters? From MP3's posted by Rien. Most headphones can represent things fine.

Tinny is unfair to the file I posted. I checked on 2 different pairs of speakers, studio and computer as well as headphones and it sounded fine. Tinny? Definitely not.

You're right on the pitch thing. I forgot that all the frequencies would be different at the hi-end. However, after bringing to the same pitch as the FM set version, it still sounds better! Surprising to me, I assure you.

Btw, I've been listening to the FM set version since 2002. I haven't listened to the Nuce version since I got the set! So, trust me when I say there's no listening bias. But it's strange how I still remember that I liked the Nuce version. Curious... This thread has awoken that old feeling for the Nuce one.


Now, I realise that the Nuce version is not the best quality and I will remedy this by cleaning it up and presenting it here as a free download. A definitive version. I've already played around with the tools needed and it sounds brilliant!
I'll restore the pitch and speed, clean the clicks/pops and will remaster it. I really feel impassioned to do this. Sometime over the next few days or couple of weeks and I'll get this done.

Btw, if they had the studio tape, why did it come out the way it did? Seriously.

Peace,
Adam.
X
Adam Baboolal wrote:
MP3 is not a bad thing


MP3 compressing is the worst thing that can happen to the sound.




But, there is NO ABSOLUTE TRUTH in the world of audiophilia / hi-fi / sound.
We all have different ears, we all hear differently.
A
XcessQueen wrote:
Adam Baboolal wrote:
MP3 is not a bad thing


MP3 compressing is the worst thing that can happen to the sound.

But, there is NO ABSOLUTE TRUTH in the world of audiophilia / hi-fi / sound.
We all have different ears, we all hear differently.


The point was that it's (mp3) not bad enough that you can't tell the good and bad of encoded songs. I guess I should've made that clearer. Especially since I forgot to post a mastering site link that demonstrates how they show off their mastering skills with 56kbps MP3s! I'm not sure I'd step that far, but interesting, no less.

And that last line about ears? I said that a couple of weeks back here, so I'm well aware. But to say there is no absolute truth in those highlighted things? Tell that to THX. There are standards after-all that work.

Peace,
Adam.