Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

Announce: Queen + PR Brixton Academy 28 march 2005

123 posts Page 4 of 9
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
F
James Gaden wrote:
If it was, nobody would use mp3's anymore and the iTunes store seems to be doing alright.


But it's a LIVE RECORDING. Even if you don't want, you'll have a half-second clicks between tracks. And they piss me off, I have to admit! Long live FLAC, f**k Mp3 ;)
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=696327 Wanna trade? Here's my list...
G
"Connection Timed Out"

Any reason? Or just not enough seeds?
R
GreatKingSam wrote:
"Connection Timed Out"

Any reason? Or just not enough seeds?


might take a while to connect sometimes. Wait, tracker (router) is down. I will reboot it when i get home in about 1.5 hours.
R
You loose bits of the lower and higher registers when you convert to a lossy format.

Lossless ensures that the sound is as good as it can be. You can tell the difference.

Apparently encoding to 320 kbs mp3, the sound spectrum is almosts identical as the original. Not sure how big the typical output file is.

Anyway, i prefer lossless encoding. That way, if i want to make MP3's i can. but if i want the original quality i have that as well. With flac you get the choice.

Obviously, anyone can make mp3's out of these recordings, but it is, obviously up to the original seeders preference.
G
No problem Richard, it's just I am at work and anxious to abuse my companies outrageous download speed to the max
T
James Gaden wrote:
I don't want to get into a big argument or anything, I want to ask a simple question. I think it's fantastic that these concerts appears for downloading so quickly after the event, but I don't understand why they are put up as flac files. I know flac has no quality loss but surely if you encode an mp3 at 160kbps or higher the quality loss is not noticeable. If it was, nobody would use mp3's anymore and the iTunes store seems to be doing alright.

My point is all these shows are audience recordings. None are direct from the soundboard, so just how much quality is the much larger flac file giving you? I would've thought mp3 was quicker to download and just as good for what these shows are. Please tell me if I've overlooked something but I know from experience how long it takes to go the bittorrent-flac route rather than download a bunch of mp3's.

JG


It's a legitimate question that hasn't been addressed recently in this forum. I'll give you my thoughts, for what they're worth.

First of all, let's examine the mp3 format. Mp3 is known as a "lossy" format because, in order to keep the file size down, some information (samples) is deleted from the source file when it is converted to mp3. Those samples are now lost forever. The first time this happens, you might not hear a difference in sound. However, let's suppose you download a concert in mp3 format and then you burn it on an audio disc. Later on, someone wants to trade or you want to upload the show. In order to do this, you rip the disc and encode it as a set of mp3 files. When this new set of mp3s is created additional samples are deleted. You still might not hear a loss of quality at this point, but what if each person who receives that show does the same thing? After many generations, what would the show sound like as additional samples are lost in each generation? There would come a time where the show would start to sound like those crappy samples you can hear on Amazon. So, the worst thing you can do if you want to build a collection of shows to trade is to burn CDs and then rip to mp3 in order to copy them.

On the other hand, if all you want to do is have the shows, and you will never become a trader, then mp3 will probably work for you.

For people who want to collect shows with the purpose of trading them, lossless formats such as FLACed wav files are essential. Wav files are not missing samples, and that's why they're so much larger. FLAC is simply a way to compress ("zip") them to about half their original size to make it easier to download them. Thus, when you get these files, you know that you have all the available data, and you have the best possible copy. If you then use a good extraction program and extract from disc to wav in order to make copies, you should be able to make an exact duplicate of the show. This is very important over many generations of copies, because there should be no difference from one generation to the next.

I hope this helps.
J
That's fine, I understand all of that and I understand why people on here like flac files. What I thought people would do it what I do - download an mp3 show, burn an audio disk of the show and then keep the mp3's, as downloaded, on another disk to burn copies of. If the clicks between tracks are are problem, take them into a sound editing program and get rid. Easy as that. Even easier is if you're a Mac user like me, to go in iTunes and just set the end time of the song a second or so earlier and it will seamlessly belnd into the following track.

I have no problem with flac files except for their size. If I traded with somebody I'd be delighted if the disk they burned me was sourced from a flac, but for downloading it's a pain. I'm as impatient as the next man to hear Queen material so I don't much care for the hours on end I have to wait to download flacs. In response to Richards point about 320kbps mp3's, I did one straight from a CD to compare file sizes. It was a song which lasts 4minutes and 4 seconds. A cd quality aiff was 41.4mb, a 320kbps was 9.8mb. I'd imagine a flac would be more like the aiff.

Thanks to everybody who's helped me understand more about flacs though, cheers!

JG
G
I've started using Azureus to download the torrents, and I'm hoping to download my first one using a super class high-speed connection from my work system, but my Azureus has a red face next to the donwload and says "not conneccted to any peer while downloading".

Is this to do with the fault Richard stated above, or is it due to possible Firewalls on my work system...?
F
If I'm doing everything right I'm seeding now as well. Will try to keep it as long as possible, can't promise anything though... Not my computer, using the work one....
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=696327 Wanna trade? Here's my list...
R
GreatKingSam: You might want to give it a little bit of time. People are connecting to the tracker OK at the moment.

If you still can't get through, after X number of hours, i would suggest that your work has blocked outgoing connections on port 6969 - the port the tracker uses.

You might need to think of a reason to get access to that port number...
S
Could somebody encode it to mp3 and post on rapidshare or something like that ? I got to wait weeks to download flac version :/
If you encode with best encoder - LAME with preset --alt-preset standard quality is very good - you cant hear difference from flac :P
For deatils : http://www.hydrogenaudio.org/forums/index.php?showtopic=28124
C
I appreciate this upload. However I would also be very grateful for having the opportunity to download this in mp3... It`s really difficult to download stuff with torrent quickly, especially via my connection. But I think yousendit.com is the better way of uploading files (no 10 MBs limit).
G
www.uploadhut.com is very good as well
M
Well congradulations.

This is the first bootleg from this tour that actually sounds good. Sure the band at times is almost drowned out by the audience but all in all the sound of the recording is vastly superior to any other recording by an audience member out there that I know of.

The band seems distant, recording of I refer too, as if you were far away from them but the show is complete and sounds quite good, as if I am there with people directly next to me. THANKS.

I'm hoping to seed some U2 from the current tour here but will need some simple but precise instructions on how to seed a torrent here. I can make flac or shn, no problem, its making all the other stuff so anyone can download it that is the task.

WKMahler
M
James Gaden wrote:
That's fine, I understand all of that and I understand why people on here like flac files. What I thought people would do it what I do - download an mp3 show, burn an audio disk of the show and then keep the mp3's, as downloaded, on another disk to burn copies of. If the clicks between tracks are are problem, take them into a sound editing program and get rid. Easy as that. Even easier is if you're a Mac user like me, to go in iTunes and just set the end time of the song a second or so earlier and it will seamlessly belnd into the following track.

I have no problem with flac files except for their size. If I traded with somebody I'd be delighted if the disk they burned me was sourced from a flac, but for downloading it's a pain. I'm as impatient as the next man to hear Queen material so I don't much care for the hours on end I have to wait to download flacs. In response to Richards point about 320kbps mp3's, I did one straight from a CD to compare file sizes. It was a song which lasts 4minutes and 4 seconds. A cd quality aiff was 41.4mb, a 320kbps was 9.8mb. I'd imagine a flac would be more like the aiff.

Thanks to everybody who's helped me understand more about flacs though, cheers!

JG


James, this site further explains the difference between MP3 and Flac (or in this site's case - wave)

http://geocities.com/cfr707/mp3.htm

Hope this further helps you.

Dave
"Normally i can't dance to save my life. But as soon as I step in dog shit, I can moonwalk better than Michael Jackson."