Skip to content
Queen crest Queenzone.org

WILL THEY TOUR AGAIN

60 posts Page 2 of 4
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
S
Queen did not tour in 2005.
This was Brian May and Roger and friends.

No Freddie and no John = NO QUEEN.
Hello?

Freddie 1991
RIP
We love you and miss you.
S
Sharon G. wrote:
Queen did not tour in 2005.
This was Brian May and Roger and friends.

No Freddie and no John = NO QUEEN.
Hello?

Freddie 1991
RIP
We love you and miss you.


NOW that you mention it! Never thought about this... hmmm.
Keep 'em mowing blades sharp!
T
BRIAN + ROGER + PAUL = QUEEN PLUS PAUL RODGERS.

LONG LIVE THE QUEEN!!!

Sharon, don't you think it's getting boring if I post this every hour??
I got to try al little more, because I'm an asshole but I'm learning. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NfTLkUcQ7QY
S
We agree to disagree on this one.

F*** them, darling, if they just don't get it.
- Freddie Mercury

Freddie 1991
RIP
We love you and miss you.
B
Sharon most sane people agree with us but unfortunately some people on here think Queen continued after 1991. These people are sad and misguided and not real Queen fans who have no respect for the good memory of Freddie Mercury.

Total and utter respect to Sir John Deacon for seeing sense.
Paul Rodgers - "Gimp Of The Year 2006"
S
Well Said BPP.

2005 Tour
Hello? This is not Queen.
F
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:
Sharon most sane people agree with us but unfortunately some people on here think Queen continued after 1991. These people are sad and misguided and not real Queen fans who have no respect for the good memory of Freddie Mercury.

Total and utter respect to Sir John Deacon for seeing sense.


Blablablablabla :-p
H
@ Sharon and that other f*cker with the long name :P
WE KNOW YOUR FUCKING NON-SENSE OPIONION, and now SU!
don't try to spoil EVERY topic witch your rubbish and leave us real fans alone.. mmmkay?
H
ye .. I'm sorry ..
but it maybe a really small group of 'fans' (personally I think they're 13 year old biys who don't even know where Queen came from and only listen to noise like Mario or something like that shit :P) .. but they ARE irritating..

as long as Sharon and that other wanker have their laughs behind their pc when they irritate us with their 'opinions' .. well .. f*ck them :P .. some say little children are nice and cute, I personally find them irritating as hell :P
J
It's Queen music and it's played reasonably well, so who gives a crap who the band is?

Man - the mental image of you bed-wetting pussies going absolutely mental every time someone uses the name "Queen" to describe this outfit just makes me laugh so damned hard. Not that it'd matter, me being on the other end of the world. Hahhaa. Keep up the good work, sissies.
J
i only asked if you thought they would tour again. not if Brian and Roger are Queen or not

I know everyone has there own thoughts on these matters. but after 14 years you would have thought people would have grown up a bit.

So what if Brian and Roger use the Queen name, That is the name of their band, good on them coming out of touring retirement and giving the fans what they have wanted for a long time. a chance to see a peice of magic last seen a life time ago in many case'es. yes Freddies dead and John has decided to live his own life. but why should that stop Brian and Roger continuing to give it there all for us lot.

Yes fair enough you have had your laugh, and you may have a point. but its been said before and no one has won the argument so lets leave it at that.
J
THE BAND calls themselves QUEEN + PAUL RODGERS... That's the official name. What do you expect from us? To make up another name ourselves just because YOU wankers don't want that name to be used? It makes communication just a little more easier, when we all use the same name for the same band. It makes it even more easy if we all use the same name the band themselves use. Unfortunately QUEEN + PAUL RODGERS decided to name themselves QUEEN + PAUL RODGERS and that's what we all should learn to live with.

Okay: new topic then:

What do you think? Will Tjap Tjoy tour again after this one?

STOP whining! You are right! It is NOT Queen! The name-discussion isn't even im frage here! But even if it where, we got the message the first time around last year! Are you gonna go through every topic in here that features the words 'QUEEN', '+ or plus', 'PAUL' and 'RODGERS' to tell the people in there that it's not Queen?
B
Hankster wrote:
@ Sharon and that other f*cker with the long name :P
WE KNOW YOUR FUCKING NON-SENSE OPIONION, and now SU!
don't try to spoil EVERY topic witch your rubbish and leave us real fans alone.. mmmkay?


Your not a REAL fan you support this fake tour. Please leave Queenzone to us real fans. Queen MUST be remembered 1973 -1991 ONLY

Thankyou
Paul Rodgers - "Gimp Of The Year 2006"
B
Hankster wrote:
ye .. I'm sorry ..
but it maybe a really small group of 'fans' (personally I think they're 13 year old biys who don't even know where Queen came from and only listen to noise like Mario or something like that shit :P) .. but they ARE irritating..

as long as Sharon and that other wanker have their laughs behind their pc when they irritate us with their 'opinions' .. well .. f*ck them :P .. some say little children are nice and cute, I personally find them irritating as hell :P


I'm 30 actually and find it DISGUSTING that so called Queen fans endorse this tour and think that Rodgers geezer is their new God.
Paul Rodgers - "Gimp Of The Year 2006"
L
Ofcourse they will. Without a doubt.
"I bet you lost your virginity to a mechanical bull"