I dont see the big deal about people getting so upset about using MP3 files intead of FLAC....These are Bootlegs they dont have a super sound quality anyway!!!!!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I can't see anything bad or wrong in mp3 actually... But that's just my own opinion.
MP3 isn't a great problem.
The only problem is that if you want to trade with it they don,t accept it.
The only problem is that if you want to trade with it they don,t accept it.
Exactly. When I'm gonna trade with someone in the future he/she won't accept my from MP3 converted WAV's.
I don't think that most of us here are downloading files for trading in future...
It's not that mp3 is "wrong", it's just that FLAC is better.
If someone offered you a VHS copy of something, you'd be happy. If they could give you a DVD of it, it would be better.
See?
If someone offered you a VHS copy of something, you'd be happy. If they could give you a DVD of it, it would be better.
See?
I don't see. Most bootleg stuff isn't recorded at great quality anyway so there shouldn't be any difference between the mp3 and flac file. I challenge anybody to tell me any audible difference between a flac and mp3 file from a bootleg
This should be a non-issue. If you like flac - fine. If you like mp3. - fine. The world is big enough for both formats.
Right. So where are the FLAC format concerts? =)
I don't see. Most bootleg stuff isn't recorded at great quality anyway so there shouldn't be any difference between the mp3 and flac file. I challenge anybody to tell me any audible difference between a flac and mp3 file from a bootleg
Do you listen to your bootlegs on computer speakers or on a decent stereo system?
I can tell the difference immediately between music I have on mp3 and music I have gotten through flac/shn/ape. Mp3s sound tinny when played on my stereo, and since that is how I listen to most of my music, I prefer quality.
Mp3 has a purpose; flac has a purpose. They don't need to be mutually exclusive, nor does one side need to tell me the other is wrong.
speaking of the quality
what are these encoded at.??
128 or 192
Villafan
what are these encoded at.??
128 or 192
Villafan
I don't see. Most bootleg stuff isn't recorded at great quality anyway so there shouldn't be any difference between the mp3 and flac file. I challenge anybody to tell me any audible difference between a flac and mp3 file from a bootleg
Agree. You must have God's ears to hear big difference between FLAC and mp3 if you listen to third copy of audience recorded bootleg!
And by the way I have pirate DVD releases of Rock In Rio and some other releases - and there's no any big difference to officially released VHS in sound quality! And yes some of the downloaded recordings I listen on computer, I don't need to listen not very quality Dortmund '79 on my stereo system. Anyway, I'd like if all files here would be published in both formats - it'd be more easy and better for guys who likes mp3 and to whom who likes flac.
the only idiots that like mp3 recordings are the ones that will sit and beg all day on this messageboard for free recordings. mp3s are for retards.
We love you too.
These 'idiots' uploads their giant collections and replies on requests in mp3/flac for such idi... sorry, guys like you. If you have something against of free recordings, what are you doing in this forum then?!
I don't see. Most bootleg stuff isn't recorded at great quality anyway so there shouldn't be any difference between the mp3 and flac file. I challenge anybody to tell me any audible difference between a flac and mp3 file from a bootleg
So, where are you form? I'll pay you a visit if you're close. Dare to put a bottle of Scotsch on it? I'm gonna win this one. ;)
My apologies, I thought this was a proper discussion. IF it's just name-calling, I'll leave you to it.