Which band is better??
Why??
Thread
Posts in chronological order
this is a f***ing no brainer - only one winner
The Beatles
how can you even put the stones and beatles head to head? at least make a fair fight
The Beatles
how can you even put the stones and beatles head to head? at least make a fair fight
John Lennon always said if the Beatles never came The Stones would be the best
Stones are good but no Beatles
Why look at the amount of fans, sales, even paul solo is better than the stones this is not an opinion but fact this is coming from a HUGE Beatles Fan and A Huge Stones Fan
Stones are good but no Beatles
Why look at the amount of fans, sales, even paul solo is better than the stones this is not an opinion but fact this is coming from a HUGE Beatles Fan and A Huge Stones Fan
Beatles!
...because they have 2 or 3 good songs... and Rolling Stones have none!!! :)))
...because they have 2 or 3 good songs... and Rolling Stones have none!!! :)))
Beatles!
...because they have 2 or 3 good songs... and Rolling Stones have none!!! :)))
Rolling Stones have lots of hits and EVERY BEATLES SONG was a HIT
Brenski..
I totally agree... I think the Beatles are beyond the Rolling stones league...
However... as sure as Freddie and Liberace are sitting at a Rhinestone piano together right now... someone will post on here that the Beatles are overated.
Or my favorite...which is real original
"Duh, da Beatles are 4 ugly dudes with 4 good songs"
Whatever,
The Beatles kick total ass.
I totally agree... I think the Beatles are beyond the Rolling stones league...
However... as sure as Freddie and Liberace are sitting at a Rhinestone piano together right now... someone will post on here that the Beatles are overated.
Or my favorite...which is real original
"Duh, da Beatles are 4 ugly dudes with 4 good songs"
Whatever,
The Beatles kick total ass.
The Beatles hands down! :)
The Beatles record speaks for itself but I prefer listening to the Stones.
Rolling Stones: the world's most over-rated band.
Sure, the stones had a few good songs, but they could not carry The Beatles jock strap.
The Beatles - absolutely no question.
Sure, the stones had a few good songs, but they could not carry The Beatles jock strap.
The Beatles - absolutely no question.
yes Obviously the Beatles here....Stones had a few good songs in the 40 or so years they have been around but not much talent on the hole....The Beatles on the other hand were incredibly creative and wrote lots of great songs in a much shorter timespan....
Beatles by a landslide.......stones are so over-rated...maybe just because drugs were so popular at that time...
Beatles by a landslide.......stones are so over-rated...maybe just because drugs were so popular at that time...
The Beatles, They came at the right time, simple words and simple music that no one has yet to par up with
The Beatles are overrated. ;)
I do appreciate the fact they have good songs, but saying every single one of them is a hit is just daft. :P
I do appreciate the fact they have good songs, but saying every single one of them is a hit is just daft. :P
The Beatles. I like The Rolling Stones but The Beatles, whether you like them or not, were revolutionary and changed music.
Well at least 27 of them are hits. Fuck you, Humperdinck! *goes to Strawberry Fields*
The Beatles. I can't really say I know of many Stones songs..Only Rock 'n' Roll, Paint It Black..er..Frenchy French Frenches? Oh, that Satisfaction one too. I don't really take any interest in them.
The love you take is equal to the love..*chords*..you make! *guitar solo*
The Beatles. I can't really say I know of many Stones songs..Only Rock 'n' Roll, Paint It Black..er..Frenchy French Frenches? Oh, that Satisfaction one too. I don't really take any interest in them.
The love you take is equal to the love..*chords*..you make! *guitar solo*
The Beatles without any doubts...
Would you make topic: Band Wars X..... Queen vs The Cross? :)
Would you make topic: Band Wars X..... Queen vs The Cross? :)