Queen crest Queenzone.org

Fredddie Mercury's vocal range

165 posts Page 4 of 11
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
S


Gregsynth wrote:







Sebastian wrote:



Freddie's total recorded range, which doesn't necessarily mean he couldn't go lower or higher than that.



By the way he also got lower than the F: Bring Back That Leroy Brown has a low C. Yes, it's slowed down, but it's slowed down from an Eb, which is still lower than the F.


Oh, are you talking about that "bassy" sounding "Bring Back That Leroy Brown" from 30-32 seconds into the song?

I know there's pitch manipulation, but how do you know if the original note was Eb2?

The pitch of a slowed-down note would be way too altered if the changed interval is a major third or larger. It acquires a demonic quality (for instance, check out the One Vision intro) and some very odd distortion. In a different setting (e.g. having that voice joined by ten more plus a lot of instruments), it'd be nearly impossible to tell, but in this case, since it's a virtually cappella during the one or two seconds it lasts, it is clear that it was not slowed down from an E or higher pitch. So, it's either Eb, or D, or C# (all of which are lower than the F) or it was not slowed down at all and Roger's memory had a slip. In any of those cases, Fred sang lower than the F.

> mooghead wrote: You must remember that most of Sebastians website is based on opinion, not fact

Wrong: it's based on research, which is not the same as opinion. Research includes things that can be mathematically measured, and as such, are facts (e.g. the Eb below F is lower than said F, which means Fred did record lower and that's a FACT), and others are based on what can be gathered via primary, secondary or indirect sources, which can have an error margin (e.g. a person [me, in this case] mishearing a backing vocal and mistakingly believing it's all Fred rather than Fred + Rog, or a person [Dr May, for instance] claiming My Fairy King is on 'Queen II', even though he WAS there and therefore is SUPPOSED to know better than any of us).

But research is not the same as opinion, or as having 'most of' it based on that. It's not a ridiculous idiotic 'hey, this song sounds heavy, so it must be written by the Iron Maiden bassist and then stolen by the band' speculation based on absolutely nothing. The 'lower than F' point, for instance, is well researched and valid. Sure, I wasn't there when they did it so I didn't witness the Eb (or D, or C#, or C) being sung (and even if I'd been there, I could easily misremember), but that's not the only way to make a research.

Or do you think Saturn's density was established by having some giant scientist holding it with a giant glove and putting it in a giant bathub and claiming 'hey, it floats!'?

>>> .Everyone knows that Freddies range spreads from < here to here >

Actually, not 'everyone knows...' In fact, there's a strong chance NOBODY knows, unless Fred actually measured from where to where he could sing, and even in that case, it doesn't guarantee he wouldn't be able to go higher or lower under different cirumstances.












John hated Hot Space. Frederick's favourite singer was not Paul Rodgers. Roger didn't compose 'Innuendo.' 'Bohemian Rhapsody' hasn't got 180 vocal overdubs.
J
5 octaves!
G
Freddie's range is greater than a piano's!
I always knew I was a star And now, the rest of the world seems to agree with me-Freddie Mercury
L
You can sing higher when you're drunk ;)
B


Gregsynth wrote:

Freddie's range is greater than a piano's!

Yeah, And a horse is purple!





IF ANY ONE WANTS MY MSN ITS [email protected] I love cool edit pro. Working on a tribute cd and need some input for songs from you:D
G


BradJarre wrote:







Gregsynth wrote:



Freddie's range is greater than a piano's!


Yeah, And a horse is purple!






I did own a purple horse named Prince...





I always knew I was a star And now, the rest of the world seems to agree with me-Freddie Mercury
S


Gregsynth wrote:







BradJarre wrote:



















Gregsynth wrote:







Freddie's range is greater than a piano's!






Yeah, And a horse is purple!
















I did own a purple horse named Prince...
















Did it do the batdance?
John hated Hot Space. Frederick's favourite singer was not Paul Rodgers. Roger didn't compose 'Innuendo.' 'Bohemian Rhapsody' hasn't got 180 vocal overdubs.
W
BRIAN WILSON CAN SING HIGHER THAN FREDDIE EVER DID! .... stoned or not, haha.
"Please buy my upcoming album... I need the money"
G


Sebastian wrote:







Gregsynth wrote:



















BradJarre wrote:











































Gregsynth wrote:















Freddie's range is greater than a piano's!














Yeah, And a horse is purple!




































I did own a purple horse named Prince...




































Did it do the batdance?

Prince did do the Batdance hundreds of times! Shame I only caught it on film once. It was the FUNNIEST thing I've ever seen in my life, I attempted to post it on Youtube, but Prince (The actual artist) pulled it off the site! It's a shame!





I always knew I was a star And now, the rest of the world seems to agree with me-Freddie Mercury
W
That's because Prince's little dink is charcoal black, and he ends up with herpes outbreaks at least twice a month. Ask Paris Hilton OR Mick Jagger about that... it's hard to prove who gave it to him!
"Please buy my upcoming album... I need the money"
D
Prince's Little Dink? Baldance? Herpes Outbreaks?   OutSTANDing!

Having recently been reminded of Freddie's true greatness(even during his badness moments) by watching bits and pieces of American Idol hopefuls doing Queen(my newest thing is to run to youtube and listen to a Queen live version immediately afterward...a cleansing, if you will)....I have to say that the thing about Freddie, for me, isn't his range, but his tone and pitch. Even moments where he'd no voice left, he still had nice tone, and managed to give a song life. Many of these well meaning folks seem to have pretty good vocal ranges....but, singing Queen songs, they all sound flat(I think the term for this is, "pitchy,") and lifeless. Perhaps Adam Lambert wasn't so bad....
Tonight I heard a version of CLTCL. The singer was good...a tenor, I think. But, he sounded utterly horrid, singing that song. No expression...no slipping to baritone and back again...no nothing. Just mildness. I needed to talk about it. Freddie Mercury had a richness to his voice, and an expressive quality which helped to make so many Queen songs unforgettable. Hearing another singer sing CLTCL(along with STL and various other Queen songs which have appeared on Idol--I've heard them all), the songs just sounded...ordinary. Not so special. Not memorable.

 I have been noticing this a great deal, lately, and felt the need to give Freddie his props...

I always had the feeling that Freddie never really knew how gifted he was, and that he always imagined he had everybody fooled.

Longass post by an ancient Queen fan...sorry, but, thanks for reading.
It is all random
G


Dusta wrote:

Prince's Little Dink? Baldance? Herpes Outbreaks?   OutSTANDing!

Having recently been reminded of Freddie's true greatness(even during his badness moments) by watching bits and pieces of American Idol hopefuls doing Queen(my newest thing is to run to youtube and listen to a Queen live version immediately afterward...a cleansing, if you will)....I have to say that the thing about Freddie, for me, isn't his range, but his tone and pitch. Even moments where he'd no voice left, he still had nice tone, and managed to give a song life. Many of these well meaning folks seem to have pretty good vocal ranges....but, singing Queen songs, they all sound flat(I think the term for this is, "pitchy,") and lifeless. Perhaps Adam Lambert wasn't so bad....
Tonight I heard a version of CLTCL. The singer was good...a tenor, I think. But, he sounded utterly horrid, singing that song. No expression...no slipping to baritone and back again...no nothing. Just mildness. I needed to talk about it. Freddie Mercury had a richness to his voice, and an expressive quality which helped to make so many Queen songs unforgettable. Hearing another singer sing CLTCL(along with STL and various other Queen songs which have appeared on Idol--I've heard them all), the songs just sounded...ordinary. Not so special. Not memorable.

I have been noticing this a great deal, lately, and felt the need to give Freddie his props...

I always had the feeling that Freddie never really knew how gifted he was, and that he always imagined he had everybody fooled.

Longass post by an ancient Queen fan...sorry, but, thanks for reading.


Completely agree: Freddie on his WORST day can sing better than ANY American Idol contestant.




I always knew I was a star And now, the rest of the world seems to agree with me-Freddie Mercury
S
I think, in spite of all the marketing and shite involved, American Idol (and other programmes like that) may occasionally spawn some truly great artists. But IMO Adam Lambert's not one of them.
John hated Hot Space. Frederick's favourite singer was not Paul Rodgers. Roger didn't compose 'Innuendo.' 'Bohemian Rhapsody' hasn't got 180 vocal overdubs.
D
Ah, Sebastian. I normally nod my head in silent agreement to your posts here, but in this case, we disagree. I do find Adam Lambert to have a lovely voice...still, he had little or no impact, for me, singing a Queen song. I will say he was better(in the We Will Rock You thingie with Brian and Roger, and, on his audition, where he sang a bit of Bo Rhap) singing Queen than any of the others I've heard to date. I don't know for certain what sort of artist he is....I tend to enjoy singer/songwriters, and, as far as I know, Mr Lambert has not written any songs. But, again, I do enjoy his voice. Just not singing Queen. Particularly.

I will also say that listening to all of this rubble come out of AI, I have more empathy for Brian and Roger, and how difficult it must be for them to satisfy their need to compose and perform without That Voice. They've moved on, now, I imagine, but it really must've been difficult shortly after the death of Freddie for them on a personal, as well as professional level.
It is all random
D


Gregsynth wrote:



 



Dusta wrote:



Prince's Little Dink? Baldance? Herpes Outbreaks?   OutSTANDing!

Having recently been reminded of Freddie's true greatness(even during his badness moments) by watching bits and pieces of American Idol hopefuls doing Queen(my newest thing is to run to youtube and listen to a Queen live version immediately afterward...a cleansing, if you will)....I have to say that the thing about Freddie, for me, isn't his range, but his tone and pitch. Even moments where he'd no voice left, he still had nice tone, and managed to give a song life. Many of these well meaning folks seem to have pretty good vocal ranges....but, singing Queen songs, they all sound flat(I think the term for this is, "pitchy,") and lifeless. Perhaps Adam Lambert wasn't so bad....
Tonight I heard a version of CLTCL. The singer was good...a tenor, I think. But, he sounded utterly horrid, singing that song. No expression...no slipping to baritone and back again...no nothing. Just mildness. I needed to talk about it. Freddie Mercury had a richness to his voice, and an expressive quality which helped to make so many Queen songs unforgettable. Hearing another singer sing CLTCL(along with STL and various other Queen songs which have appeared on Idol--I've heard them all), the songs just sounded...ordinary. Not so special. Not memorable.



I have been noticing this a great deal, lately, and felt the need to give Freddie his props...



I always had the feeling that Freddie never really knew how gifted he was, and that he always imagined he had everybody fooled.



Longass post by an ancient Queen fan...sorry, but, thanks for reading.



 



Completely agree: Freddie on his WORST day can sing better than ANY American Idol contestant.



 






And I find that surprising, really, since they really work hard(seemingly) to find the best of the best to compete on the show. And there are so MANY of them. Everywhere. I don't recall, back in ancient times, having the volume of new different, "artists," playing on the radio as there seems to be today. So many new names.  So many new ways of marketing an individual.
And, despite all of this, Freddie still stands out. Remarkable, really.






It is all random