Queen are Brian May, Roger Taylor and John

M

Mercuryworks 01 August 2005 16:28 · Member since September 2004

Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:
Mercuryworks wrote:
its_a_hard_life wrote:
when i do see Queen+pr i mostly go to see Brian and Roger as they ARE QUEEN not Paul Rogders as u no it says Queen+PR the + sign means (AND) so Paul is'nt part of Queen..not matter what anyone else says..Now i went to see them in Hyde Park and it was great Paul can really sing..that doesnt mean i will change my mind and start liking him over freddie, but freddies gone and Brian and Roger are just moving on with there lives like should everyone else we cant mope around forever thinking that will bring Freddie back..im have nothing agaisnt Paul but HES NOT QUEEN...thats all.

I couldn't agree more.

As for Bryans Permed Poodle and Sharon G. grow up and get some lives. You both have to be about 11 years old. And For BPP why dont you make a thread attempting to ban me and we'll see how many sign.

I think you should ban yourself and join the Paul Rodgers fan club. You have no respect for Freddie. You are not a REAL Queen fan.

And let me guess you are a REAL Queen Fan....bullshit you are because then you would have understood why Brian and Roger want to play with Paul and why Paul is a good choice.

B

bryans permed poodle 15069 01 August 2005 16:56 · Member since November 2004

Mercuryworks wrote:
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:
Mercuryworks wrote:
its_a_hard_life wrote:
when i do see Queen+pr i mostly go to see Brian and Roger as they ARE QUEEN not Paul Rogders as u no it says Queen+PR the + sign means (AND) so Paul is'nt part of Queen..not matter what anyone else says..Now i went to see them in Hyde Park and it was great Paul can really sing..that doesnt mean i will change my mind and start liking him over freddie, but freddies gone and Brian and Roger are just moving on with there lives like should everyone else we cant mope around forever thinking that will bring Freddie back..im have nothing agaisnt Paul but HES NOT QUEEN...thats all.

I couldn't agree more.

As for Bryans Permed Poodle and Sharon G. grow up and get some lives. You both have to be about 11 years old. And For BPP why dont you make a thread attempting to ban me and we'll see how many sign.

I think you should ban yourself and join the Paul Rodgers fan club. You have no respect for Freddie. You are not a REAL Queen fan.

And let me guess you are a REAL Queen Fan....bullshit you are because then you would have understood why Brian and Roger want to play with Paul and why Paul is a good choice.

REAL Queen fans remember the REAL Queen (you know the one with Freddie in it or have you forgotten?) A lot of Queen fans have no interest in two FORMER members of the band trying to live on past glories. QUEEN in any shape or form finished in 1991 (Brian and Roger were both quoted saying back in 1991 "QUEEN cannot carry on without Freddie"). So if Queen could not carry on back in 1991 why use the name Queen now ? They could have found a new singer back then even the mighty Paul Rodgers (laugh!). I couldn't give a flying shit what people say but using thew name Queen and having an unknown singer is just plain wrong and many Queen fans I speak to agree with this.

Freddie WAS Queen. Queen WAS his band.

L

Lester Burnham 01 August 2005 17:14 · Member since May 2003

Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:
Freddie WAS Queen. Queen WAS his band.

Nuh-uh. Freddie was 25% Queen.

Silly poodle.

C

Crockerdile 01 August 2005 17:15 · Member since March 2002

Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:
REAL Queen fans remember the REAL Queen (you know the one with Freddie in it or have you forgotten?) A lot of Queen fans have no interest in two FORMER members of the band trying to live on past glories. QUEEN in any shape or form finished in 1991 (Brian and Roger were both quoted saying back in 1991 "QUEEN cannot carry on without Freddie"). So if Queen could not carry on back in 1991 why use the name Queen now ? They could have found a new singer back then even the mighty Paul Rodgers (laugh!). I couldn't give a flying shit what people say but using thew name Queen and having an unknown singer is just plain wrong and many Queen fans I speak to agree with this.

Freddie WAS Queen. Queen WAS his band.

Your argument, much like a broken pencil, is pointless. Oh and your talking sh*t too. Begs the question as to why, one can only assume you've nothing better to do with your time. That's sad.

M

Mercuryworks 01 August 2005 17:21 · Member since September 2004

Now I understand what you are saying but in fact the whole thread is about me saying what you said. But what I am saying is just appreciate that two members of your favorite band are still playing with someone of their status. It is like the only supergroup that have formed in a while and to give Paul a chance and chrish the moments of Roger and Brian while they are still here would be great (By the way Queen were equal I mean big hits like "Another Bites The Dust" and "We Will Rock You" are sung many many many times in Americas and I imagine everywhere during sport games, clubs, and commercials and they werent written by Freddie Mercury). Ill tell you one thing If Brian and Roger went with Ringo and Paul McCartney to start a supergroup noone would be complaining especially you and Sharon.

S

Sharon G. 01 August 2005 17:24 · Member since March 2005

and Ringo and Paul M. would never ever call this so called supergroup "The Beatles."

B

bohemian 11513 01 August 2005 17:37 · Member since July 2004

Lester Burnham wrote:
Bryans Permed Poodle wrote:
Freddie WAS Queen. Queen WAS his band.

Nuh-uh. Freddie was 25% Queen.

Silly poodle.

25%??? Thats bull****... You don`t know better, do you Lester?

R

Ray D O'Gaga 01 August 2005 19:31 · Member since July 2002

Zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz

Posts in chronological order