Need some advice regarding autographs!

Hey everyone,

Over the past few years I've purchased a few Queen related items which have supposedly been signed by the band. I've emailed pictures to Jackie and she has said they are all genuine. BUT I have heard that she can't tell the different between Mick Jagger and Freddies autographs so if possible I would really appreciate it if someone could give me their honest views on how genuine these are!
Sorry if the pics are slightly blurred but they were the best I could take.

John
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y160/SRTUK/Picture9.jpg

Freddie
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y160/SRTUK/Picture6.jpg

Brian
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y160/SRTUK/Picture2.jpg

Freddie again
http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y160/SRTUK/Picture1.jpg

Ok cheers guys,

Scott

John's (especially with this $) and first Freddie's (two very different 'd') looks suspicious for me...

I'm by no means any kind of expert, but I'd say only the Brian one might be genuine.

The first Fred looks utterly fake, like it was done by a 10 year-old. You can see that it's been written slowly, with caution, as a shite forger would do, carefully trying to copy something they're looking at, rather than quickly and fluidly, as Fred would have done it, being as he was entirely comfortable with signing his own name.

The John one just doesn't look right.

The second Fred one is signed on a poster of the Live At Wembley 86 cover-shot isn't it? Did that kind of stuff exist prior to the album release? Cos if it didn't...

Thanks guys! Any other opinions will be greatly appreciated.
I'll look into this a bit more.


Thanks again,

Scott

All are fake you can definately tell

<font color=#F003300><font>Mercuryworks wrote:

All are fake you can definately tell

How do you know?

Well unless John Deacon was drunk and crosseyed
And Freddie was cold as hell and was shaking
And Brian forget to spell his name properly
And Freddie came back to life in 1992 to sign a poster

Then maybe.... just maybe they are real

lol fantastic reply!

Brilliant thanks for letting me know everyone. The actually wembley pic is like a photograph(ish) sized one but if the pic wasn't released till 92 that kind of says it all really lol.

Cheers guys,
Scott

i was about to say, i dont think there was ANY Live At Wembley 86 posters like the one you showed with Freddies autograph, back when Freddie was Alive, so that i think is def a fake, other freddie looks shite and is no way cud be freddie, johns doesnt seem right and brians im not too sure about

<font color=#F003300><font>Mercuryworks wrote:

Well unless John Deacon was drunk and crosseyed
And Freddie was cold as hell and was shaking
And Brian forget to spell his name properly
And Freddie came back to life in 1992 to sign a poster

Then maybe.... just maybe they are real

Couldn't agree more.
On the first autograph ''Freddie'' wrote kisses or sth like that,so,from the handwriting u can understand write away that this is not a Freddie autograph
''Brian's'' autograph rings many bells that it is a fake one ect,ect......

Ask Martin at www.queenconcerts.com

i'd say that if yOU SAW freddie sign them in the flesh and it was after 1991 then they could well be fake ;-)

The last Freddie one looks real and the Brian one sort of does, but the rest are, I don't know. Its not like they can all sign the same way every time so I don't know the truth of these signatures. But, some of these were probably signed standing up or at a weird angle, especially when there are tons of fans making you be quick.

''Well unless John Deacon was drunk and crosseyed
And Freddie was cold as hell and was shaking
And Brian forget to spell his name properly
And Freddie came back to life in 1992 to sign a poster''

Who says it was from 1992?

Poster could be make for Queen at Wembley video which was released before Freddie's death, in 1990.