http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queenzone
we are mentioned in a wikipedia article
this might be old but whatever
Arlene wrote it, I think because it is a pretty good article
Thread
Posts in chronological order
the_hero is the first person in list of 'popular members'... Hehe... Some guys would not like it, I guess... ;)
Well, someone replaced his name near the end... Heh...
I didnt make it
Arlene wrote it, I think because it is a pretty good article
Of course, what kind of journalist wouldn't mention themselves? Anyway, everyone loves Arlene.
Sadly, Jeffrey_Todd, isn't popular, whoever it is.
For the record, I only use the underscore in chat, but what's with pointing out that I'm not there? I'd rather not be actually.
Some of you have proven yourselves to be ridiculously childish, getting into silly arguments over this stupid list on a stupid site.
Not necessarily in this thread, but in some of the many other identical threads posted in every section.
Get over it already!
It's a clash of the egos
thats so cool. were such nerds lol
Yay, I was listed.
I agree, it should be deleted. Anyone who wants information about this website should just go to this website. Good as it is, that article is a waste of webspace.
barn why are you so "popular" and "contributive" all of a sudden. He has actually gave a lot to QZ
They want to delete the article, btw, so I advise anyone who wants to keep it to say so here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Queenzone
(read this part first: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_policy#Commenting_on_a_listing_for_deletion)
Yes, everyone else, please vote to Keep it.