Who do you think would have been better choice than Paul Rodgers?

Everyone keeps bashing Paul Rodgers so who do you think would have been a better choice?
I personaly cant come up with anyone else that would have seriously considered it.I think he was very brave to take on such a feat.

nobody! what the hell were they thinking? Paul also has a shitty voice.

Fenderek. He's a singer too.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]tia wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Everyone keeps bashing Paul Rodgers so who do you think would have been a better choice?
I personaly cant come up with anyone else that would have seriously considered it.I think he was very brave to take on such a feat.[/QUOTE]

Freddie Mercury

THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Let BPP take on vocals. They'd have no chance but to retire after such a fiasco, so he'll at least shut up...

Anyway, I think Rodgers was pretty much the best choice.[/QUOTE]

Apart from Miss Piggy out of the Muppets

William MAhler

Jeff Scoto Soto

Got the REAL fans vote of approval

SUPERB IN EVERY WAY

Cliff Richard :D

Phil Collins

but u jst sed ther cud only b 1
?????????

well freddie is really hard 2 replace but it mitv worked if brian n roger jst carried on alone, they r the original queen!
paul rogers is alrite tho

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]stars12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Jeff Scoto Soto

Got the REAL fans vote of approval

SUPERB IN EVERY WAY[/QUOTE]

LOL!
At the recent Queen convention, the REAL fans said he blew chunks.

They said he was the worst act of the convention.

Michael Jackson

Mr Blobby

Niek Lukassen ;)