OK, so... after "convention's leakages" - what's new about Houston video?!

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Yes, you are right. It was my convenient spin!
I'm a miserable lowlife scumbag arrogant elite trader fuckhead. As a matter of FACT I'm Queenzone's biggest asshole and I am only here to brag about my ENOURMOUS collection, poke people's eyes out and then tell them to eat shit.

[/QUOTE]

Jeroen - I never said or implied that. All I did was state that your comments are less than objective and had a heavy pro-trader / anti-leecher spin.

Not all this crap again.

*Sleeps*

Yawn...

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Thank you all guys! So, the leakage is not good. As I understand it is even just pictures with EX audio that we all have... Does anybody know exactly what this leakage is?! Ah?![/QUOTE]

To answer your question:
The picture quality is VG(+) en the sound quality is Ex. It isn`t the best version around but it is an full version and is absolutly worth watching. The pictures between the songs are not irritating.

i take it you have it?

Can it be posted?

Queen houston dvd is now on ebay. Maybe it's the convention leak?
http://cgi.ebay.com/QUEEN-houston-77-DVD_W0QQitemZ6444950436QQcategoryZ59009QQssPageNameZWDVWQQrdZ1QQcmdZViewItem

Thank you, Roy & gagabo2 for the link. Thank you for the first answer to my question. So... this is FULL! ...And it's VG video quality. That's fantastic great! Roy, is it "straight"-filming or filmed from the convention screen (like Knebworth)? If it's straight-filming full version with VG video & EX audio - what else can we dream about?!?!?!?!

Roy, if you want to, how do you know all this about Houston '77? :-)))

WHEN CAN WE EXPECT IT BEING BOOTLEGGED? HERE!

Again and again, so few fans talk about this, it suggest an idea that it's a fake. Why we don't see many pictures from this filming etc, etc, etc???

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Thank you, Roy & gagabo2 for the link. Thank you for the first answer to my question. So... this is FULL! ...And it's VG video quality. That's fantastic great! Roy, is it "straight"-filming or filmed from the convention screen (like Knebworth)? If it's straight-filming full version with VG video & EX audio - what else can we dream about?!?!?!?!

Roy, if you want to, how do you know all this about Houston '77? :-)))

[/QUOTE]

- It's pro shoot (straigth)
- Picture quality VG(+)
- Sound quality Ex
- Length 114 minutes

Not many people talk about because not many people have it. Pictures are widely available on the net.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]the_hero wrote: [/QUOTENAME]St. Paul 1980 on the other hand is really only trading worthy. It was shown yesterday as well. It was an audience recording and it seemed that the filmer couldn't get a good position to film clearly.[/QUOTE]
Are you nuts?
Unless they showed a realy bad copy, this is one of the best (maybe THE best) old audience recording around!

Fine, honey! If you say so...

You're the expert!

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]the_hero wrote: [/QUOTENAME]St. Paul 1980 on the other hand is really only trading worthy. It was shown yesterday as well. It was an audience recording and it seemed that the filmer couldn't get a good position to film clearly.[/QUOTE]
Are you nuts?
Unless they showed a realy bad copy, this is one of the best (maybe THE best) old audience recording around![/QUOTE]

I second that. Uniondale 1977 is also a very good audience recording. Very clear. :-)

It's here!... Oh...

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=green>Rick wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]the_hero wrote: [/QUOTENAME]St. Paul 1980 on the other hand is really only trading worthy. It was shown yesterday as well. It was an audience recording and it seemed that the filmer couldn't get a good position to film clearly.[/QUOTE]
Are you nuts?
Unless they showed a realy bad copy, this is one of the best (maybe THE best) old audience recording around![/QUOTE]

I second that. Uniondale 1977 is also a very good audience recording. Very clear. :-)[/QUOTE]
True - but Uniondale is indeed a bit better then St Paul - in clearness.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Rip Van Winkle wrote:
Jeroen - I never said or implied that. All I did was state that your comments are less than objective and had a heavy pro-trader / anti-leecher spin.[/QUOTE]

Hmmm... you certainly put a negative spin on Jeroen's words. I neither know nor care about any bad blood regarding traders, but you certainly appeared to spin Jeroen's words quite strongly. His words could quite easily have been read in an entirely different light - as indeed I did.
Instead of your "Let them eat cake" spin, I took it as "The good things in life are worth waiting for and sometimes you have to wait" whether it be for an official release or to find someone with a good copy who will share.

The comments about the "excellent full version" seem to me to be saying that its unlikely to surface from traders due to whatever crap happened. He never said or implied that he had it and wasnt trading or had any kind of comment or implication about leeches that I saw.
Oh well... each to their own. What is it they say about the truth? There are three versions, yours, mine and the truth.

Steve