They beat such a great bands like Dream Theater, Velvet Revolver, Audioslave and Judas Priest. Classic Rock is a british music magazine.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
You said they beat great bands... like who?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]You said they beat great bands... like who?[/QUOTE]
E.g. Videomaster! :-)))
E.g. Videomaster! :-)))
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]You said they beat great bands... like who?[/QUOTE]
Like the ones I mentioned... Waht would you rather see there- Oasis? Maybe I should have added that Classic Rock is about classic rock, not about up and coming bands i.e. Coldplay or whatevert the hell they play on the radio nowadays (don't listen to it myself...). And if you don't consider audioslave and Velvet and DT to be great than... you listen to different music, simple as that... They write about classic rock, in depth- and I guess that's one of the few magazines where you can still read about let's say Deep Purple... Or Queen for that matter- now, when this tour was annpunced every paper writes about it but 2-3 years ago it was a bit different...
And it's nice that the readers of the magazine that focuses on THIS partular genre that Queen comes from recognised them (or their venture with PR) as the best thing this year, isn't it? And they couldn't beat Beatles or Sabbath because those bands don't do anything at the moment...
Like the ones I mentioned... Waht would you rather see there- Oasis? Maybe I should have added that Classic Rock is about classic rock, not about up and coming bands i.e. Coldplay or whatevert the hell they play on the radio nowadays (don't listen to it myself...). And if you don't consider audioslave and Velvet and DT to be great than... you listen to different music, simple as that... They write about classic rock, in depth- and I guess that's one of the few magazines where you can still read about let's say Deep Purple... Or Queen for that matter- now, when this tour was annpunced every paper writes about it but 2-3 years ago it was a bit different...
And it's nice that the readers of the magazine that focuses on THIS partular genre that Queen comes from recognised them (or their venture with PR) as the best thing this year, isn't it? And they couldn't beat Beatles or Sabbath because those bands don't do anything at the moment...
Oasis?? GOOD GOD NO!
I'd rather cut my balls off and feed them to a pirahna than listen to Oasis.
I really was just poking fun, and I'm awfully happy that Q+PR won the poll. Even with only 2 original members, they're still shitting on all the other crap we see these days.
Paul and Ringo oughta give it a shot.
I'd rather cut my balls off and feed them to a pirahna than listen to Oasis.
I really was just poking fun, and I'm awfully happy that Q+PR won the poll. Even with only 2 original members, they're still shitting on all the other crap we see these days.
Paul and Ringo oughta give it a shot.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Paul and Ringo oughta give it a shot.[/QUOTE]
With... Ozzy Osbourne instead of John ;)
With... Ozzy Osbourne instead of John ;)
and a kurt cobain lookalike for george
band of the year (classic rock), the rolling stones!!