[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Compliance Queen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]How about Paul in Playgirl??? (if it still exists)
yummy!!!! Oh and RMT photos in the same mag. Yippee!!! LOL[/QUOTE]
Hmm...think I'd pass on that...*lol*
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Erin wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Compliance Queen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]How about Paul in Playgirl??? (if it still exists)
yummy!!!! Oh and RMT photos in the same mag. Yippee!!! LOL[/QUOTE]
Hmm...think I'd pass on that...*lol* [/QUOTE]
Erin- you're no fun!!! 55 year old men don't turn you on??LOL
yummy!!!! Oh and RMT photos in the same mag. Yippee!!! LOL[/QUOTE]
Hmm...think I'd pass on that...*lol* [/QUOTE]
Erin- you're no fun!!! 55 year old men don't turn you on??LOL
Heehee!!
Paul looked better when he was younger...and had longer hair. The monk-cut doesn't suit him.
Paul looked better when he was younger...and had longer hair. The monk-cut doesn't suit him.
Who is Paul Rodgers ???
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mrs Doyle wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Heehee!!
Paul looked better when he was younger...and had longer hair. The monk-cut doesn't suit him.[/QUOTE]
I know it's a weave...but I like it ;-)
Rock on!!!
Paul looked better when he was younger...and had longer hair. The monk-cut doesn't suit him.[/QUOTE]
I know it's a weave...but I like it ;-)
Rock on!!!
If they record a new album consisting of all new tunes, imo,they shouldn't use "Queen". I think there are people who reluctantly coaxed themselves to call this "Queen+Paul Rodgers" tour by defining it as the one in which Brian, Roger and Paul Rodgers intented to play Queen numbers as far as they could do for both the old fans who have desperated for Queen live stages and the new ones who came to like Queen after 1991.
well said MB.im still pissed though
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]My Melancholy Blues wrote: [/QUOTENAME]If they record a new album consisting of all new tunes, imo,they shouldn't use "Queen". I think there are people who reluctantly coaxed themselves to call this "Queen+Paul Rodgers" tour by defining it as the one in which Brian, Roger and Paul Rodgers intented to play Queen numbers as far as they could do for both the old fans who have desperated for Queen live stages and the new ones who came to like Queen after 1991. [/QUOTE]
Not gonna happen. The brand name is too important. "Queen + Paul Rodgers" it is, and "Queen + Paul Rodgers" shall it ever be. Thus sayeth the Lord.
Not gonna happen. The brand name is too important. "Queen + Paul Rodgers" it is, and "Queen + Paul Rodgers" shall it ever be. Thus sayeth the Lord.
Plus the fact that they've done like 40 dates on three different continents, and sold a CD and DVD under the name of Queen + Paul Rodgers.
It would be kind of foolish to change it now.
It would be kind of foolish to change it now.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Knute wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Plus the fact that they've done like 40 dates on three different continents, and sold a CD and DVD under the name of Queen + Paul Rodgers.
It would be kind of foolish to change it now.[/QUOTE]
Right ON
It would be kind of foolish to change it now.[/QUOTE]
Right ON
My battle cry: "We want new material!!" And soon!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mrs Doyle wrote: [/QUOTENAME]My battle cry: "We want new material!!" And soon![/QUOTE]
New material would be nice..to see what evolves but I am happy with what they are doing now.
New material would be nice..to see what evolves but I am happy with what they are doing now.