i have only been here for about a month and i dont want change.
happy new year BTW.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
For me this is the new design, it's only about 2 years old I think :)
No, no new design, please! I think that the conversation is what matters here, right? =)
I don't think it needs a new design. It just needs some new decent people to post instead of the constant mindnumbing crap that has been on here recently :-)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]PieterMC wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I don't think it needs a new design. It just needs some new decent people to post instead of the constant mindnumbing crap that has been on here recently :-)[/QUOTE]
Yup, and I'm like YV..I thought this WAS a new design. ;-)
Yup, and I'm like YV..I thought this WAS a new design. ;-)
It could be changed a little bit cos it's a bit basic like a few of you on here. We could have avatars and a bit more colour.
Looks new to me:
http://web.archive.org/web/20010330225735/http://queenzone.com/
and please, please, please no avatars
http://web.archive.org/web/20010330225735/http://queenzone.com/
and please, please, please no avatars
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=pink>LilySavage wrote: [/QUOTENAME]It could be changed a little bit cos it's a bit basic like a few of you on here. We could have avatars and a bit more colour.[/QUOTE]
But it's NOT your site! If the majority do NOT want this - why change it at all?
But it's NOT your site! If the majority do NOT want this - why change it at all?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=pink>LilySavage wrote: [/QUOTENAME]It could be changed a little bit cos it's a bit basic like a few of you on here. We could have avatars and a bit more colour.[/QUOTE]
But it's NOT your site! If the majority do NOT want this - why change it at all?
But it's NOT your site! If the majority do NOT want this - why change it at all?
F*ck avatars! Pics of band members are in picture gallery, our pics in our profiles, end of story.
I still use the old board for most of my viewing. All that fancy color and quote blocks distract too much from the content.
That and I'm a stubborn old mule.
That and I'm a stubborn old mule.
What's wrong with the site? Works fine for me. I could use a new computer, though...
Current Design is OK.
Perhaps a focus on system bugs (i.e Cookie problem), or even the inclusion of extra features, or a better links section (current one is a bit limited).
Perhaps a focus on system bugs (i.e Cookie problem), or even the inclusion of extra features, or a better links section (current one is a bit limited).
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=pink>LilySavage wrote: [/QUOTENAME]It could be changed a little bit cos it's a bit basic like a few of you on here. We could have avatars and a bit more colour.[/QUOTE]
The "basic" things always work best. I prefer a simple site than one with tons of useless stuff which slows down navigation and just complicates our lives...
Yeah yeah I'm very basic.
The "basic" things always work best. I prefer a simple site than one with tons of useless stuff which slows down navigation and just complicates our lives...
Yeah yeah I'm very basic.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=pink>LilySavage wrote: [/QUOTENAME]It could be changed a little bit cos it's a bit basic like a few of you on here. We could have avatars and a bit more colour.[/QUOTE]
QOL has avatars. If you prefer style over substance, than QOL is for you.
QOL has avatars. If you prefer style over substance, than QOL is for you.