Queen crest Queenzone

CHARLIE AND THE CHOCLATE FACTORY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

14 posts
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
WHO LIKES THE NEW MOVIE? PERSONALLY I THINK ITS CRAP BECAUSE ITS ONE UMPA LUMPA AND HES COMPUTER ANIMATED TO LOOK SMALL ALSO I HATE THE SONGS AND IF THAT AINT ENOUGH THEY DELETED ALL THE GOOD PARTS OUT OF THE FILM LIKE WHEN CHARLIE FLOATS AND THE ENDING IS MESSED UP. BUT WHAT DO YOU THINK?
To be immortal first you have to live a life that is Remember able
Must you yell?


You're Wierd.....
"Not a fan of the ladies, are you Trebek?" Sean Connery
yep i think he must, because i havnt seen it and dont want to, i mean i dont like johnny depp and everyone knows sequels or remakes nearly 99% suck all the time, i did notice the fatter kid in there was wearing one of them tops roger wore at wembley 86, just different colour
purples a fruit
For those who have not seen the movie, for whatever reason....

You are missing a great one.
"Not a fan of the ladies, are you Trebek?" Sean Connery
The original was the best !
http://queen.shanemcdonald.org/ (Shanes Queen Site) Follow me on Twitter Twitter.com/smcdonalddotorg Follow me on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/ShaneMcDonaldorg/118978468128623
The orignal was best but this is a great movie in it's own right i agree the songs suck and Depp Protrays wonka to be a bit Simple instead of a geninus but it's a closer adaptation to the book than the original. It was only when i watched it at home the second time that i thought wow this is a great movie just dont try to compare the two of them or you wont see it for what it is...brilliantly written and produced.It also had most of the Dahl Kids involved which must give it some credibility if they give it there thumbs up.
~You call me sweet like i'm some kind of cheese~ www.myspace.com/aishasweetness www.myspace.com/eathamsandwich
Bad movies are the ones that should be re-made.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Brandon wrote: [/QUOTENAME]... and now the "best you can offer is Mr. Jingles? HA! He's... just pathetic.[/QUOTE]
I agree, the new one sucks. Is this the beginning of the end for Donnie Brasco? I'll bet ya Pirates 2 sucks too!
the original was A LOT better then new one sucks, i only like laughing at how great of an act Johnny Depp can but on in this movie copared to the others, he's very talented.
One should ANALize the Poetry on page 43, when Oedipus is rollin' in his benzo and he has to bust a cap on some flagrants in the under city http://www.albinoblacksheep.com/image/essay/1
"New"????
the original is fantastic the remake is just a bad effort.
http://blackballoon.editboard.com/index.forum http://i90.photobucket.com/albums/k266/fraser24/GGO.jpg
Okay, history lesson for some of you that may have missed it.

The 1970's movie, Willy Wonka and The Chocolate Factory is a loose adaptation of the book by Roald Dahl, called Charlie and the Chocolate Factory.

The 2005 movie, Charlie and The Chocolate Factory is a very close adaptation of the book, meaning that most of the storyline (including the Oompa-Loompa songs) is almost completely similar to the storyline. The parts about Wonka's father and such, though, were made up, I believe.

So, of course it is not an exact remake of the classic movie (starring Gene Wilder, one hell of an actor), but instead stays true to the book.
We can only grow the way the wind blows On a bare and weathered shore We can only bow to the here and now In our elemental war - Rush, "The Way The Wind Blows"
the movie was pathetic !!! really starting to underapreciate Tim Burton
that's enough about me, now, what do you think of me ?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=blue>Fraser wrote: [/QUOTENAME]the original is fantastic the remake is just a bad effort.[/QUOTE]

The so called remake is a very, very close interpretation of the book. Even the songs are direct from the book.

The Gene Wilder one was a based on the book, though loosely.
"Not a fan of the ladies, are you Trebek?" Sean Connery

Sign in to reply