RATE PAUL RODGERS OUT OF 10

I would give him him 1 out of 10. His 1 hit wonder "Alright Now" was not too bad but it's obvious he cannot sing very well at all. He would be okay on a cruise ship or holiday camp but to call him a proffesional is ludicrous. Okay he looks like a 70's Porno star that's not his fault granted but he still looks a div.

So all in all Robbie Williams should have invited Brian and Roger to perform with him as backing singers and session musicians. That would be a great show from the UK's no 1 Entertainer.

so i suppose everything you say is right because you lick robbies arse, go on tell us, what it taste like?, ay ay chicken

*

Id give Paul -100 out of 10. Think thats fair

Guess I'd give him a 5 out of 10 just because I'm not overly keen on his voice but I'm not anti Q+PR.

That's the good thing about so many newby's, isn't it BPP? You can post the same crap over and over again and still find people to respond :-)

Luckily you are still just as funny as you've always been.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME] <font color=FF0099>Linda Of The Valley wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jeroen wrote: [/QUOTENAME]That's the good thing about so many newby's, isn't it BPP? You can post the same crap over and over again and still find people to respond :-)

Luckily you are still just as funny as you've always been.[/QUOTE]

xD you seriously think he's funny? [/QUOTE]
Nowadays I can only laugh about this disaster of a person ;-)

Paul Rodgers fits in well with the material that they have performed live.

How anyone, after listening to the shows that they have done, can say that he is not a top notch singer is a blithering idiot.

You may have a personal grudge, you may say "It's not Freddie", but, in the end, Paul was, and is, the single best fit that exists.


This US tour will be a smashing success, just watch and see.

I'd say 8 out of 10, i realise hes not freddie, but as far as singers go, hes pretty damn good.

RW: 9/10
PR: 7,5/10

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]He's definitely 8/10. Robbie would maybe get 3/10 on a good night.[/QUOTE]

Agreed...as a matter of fact, I think this is the first statement you and I have agreed on. I have to say, though, that 3/10 for Robbie seems a little generous. But that's just my 2 cents.

Paul 10/10
Robbie- -2 (that's "two below zero") in the scale 1-10

Paul 10/10
Freddie 9/10
Robbie 3/10

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Alex Solan wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I don't like Queen + PR but that doesn't mean I'm not entitled to criticize this "project" [/QUOTE]

First you say this, and it's absolutely cool...
But than, in next sentence you say:
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Alex Solan wrote: [/QUOTENAME]If you people like Queen + PR that's cool, so please keep it to yourself, in private. [/QUOTE]
Contradict yourself, my friend. Either one way or another...
Either all sides can say what they think or neither. I'm not going to keep it private. The same way as people don't keep their political views, don't keep private their hatred towards Paul, don't keep private many other things that I or you or anyone may not like...

Paul Rodgers might be bit loose while wearing the Freddie Mercury shoes, but he can still walk with them.

From 1 to 10... I'd say 8

10 being Freddie