[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhoun wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Very good question. If the Democrats here in America could actually come up with an idea rather than their brand of venom and hatred, they could perhaps win an election or two....
Short of that, I don't know what it will take. I thought 9/11 would bring us together, but that lasted about 2 1/2 weeks, then the idiots like Pelosi and Kennedy started popping off....[/QUOTE]
Another fine example of a fascist in his purest form. I suppose you'd have all Democrats shot if you had your way, hmm? Need I remind you that
a) the most corrupt presidency ever (Harding)
b) the only president ever to to be removed from office (Nixon)
c) the president with the largest toll of dead American soldiers on his conto (Nixon)
Were all Republicans? And there's more than just this. It's just the tip of the iceberg.[/QUOTE]
Fascist??? for suggesting the Democrats have no ideas? Talk about hyperbole.
The Democrats could have done much better than the "defeat Bush" rhetoric of Gore or Kerry. Even Howard Dean would have been better. At least he had ideas, although he is a bit of a flake.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Break, gentlemen! No contest.
Each one take a cookie, and shake hands!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhoun wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Very good question. If the Democrats here in America could actually come up with an idea rather than their brand of venom and hatred, they could perhaps win an election or two....
Short of that, I don't know what it will take. I thought 9/11 would bring us together, but that lasted about 2 1/2 weeks, then the idiots like Pelosi and Kennedy started popping off....[/QUOTE]
Another fine example of a fascist in his purest form. I suppose you'd have all Democrats shot if you had your way, hmm? Need I remind you that
a) the most corrupt presidency ever (Harding)
b) the only president ever to to be removed from office (Nixon)
c) the president with the largest toll of dead American soldiers on his conto (Nixon)
Were all Republicans? And there's more than just this. It's just the tip of the iceberg.[/QUOTE]
You have made my point for me.
Thank you.
Short of that, I don't know what it will take. I thought 9/11 would bring us together, but that lasted about 2 1/2 weeks, then the idiots like Pelosi and Kennedy started popping off....[/QUOTE]
Another fine example of a fascist in his purest form. I suppose you'd have all Democrats shot if you had your way, hmm? Need I remind you that
a) the most corrupt presidency ever (Harding)
b) the only president ever to to be removed from office (Nixon)
c) the president with the largest toll of dead American soldiers on his conto (Nixon)
Were all Republicans? And there's more than just this. It's just the tip of the iceberg.[/QUOTE]
You have made my point for me.
Thank you.
True democracy is just an illusion.
Quasi-communism would be a fine system.
Quasi-communism would be a fine system.
Yup, thinking (and rightfully so) that Nancy Pelosi and Ted Kennedy are idiots means that I am a fascist, and want Democrats shot...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lisser wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
/hijack-there is a cutey pie of a JRT in a local petshop here. I do not like to buy animals from petshops though. I prefer rescues, but GOSH!!! He's soooooo damn cute!! Should I??? /hijack[/QUOTE]
I'm with you on the petshop thing. Would much rather rescue a dog, which I've done in the past, then get one from a petshop. But if it's really cute, get two :)
Also, for Caspar:
Harding ran on a "return to normalcy" plan which meant retreating from international affairs and becoming isolationists. Completely different than modern-day Republicans. That's the problem with labels.
/hijack-there is a cutey pie of a JRT in a local petshop here. I do not like to buy animals from petshops though. I prefer rescues, but GOSH!!! He's soooooo damn cute!! Should I??? /hijack[/QUOTE]
I'm with you on the petshop thing. Would much rather rescue a dog, which I've done in the past, then get one from a petshop. But if it's really cute, get two :)
Also, for Caspar:
Harding ran on a "return to normalcy" plan which meant retreating from international affairs and becoming isolationists. Completely different than modern-day Republicans. That's the problem with labels.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhoun wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Yup, thinking (and rightfully so) that Nancy Pelosi and Ted Kennedy are idiots means that I am a fascist, and want Democrats shot...
[/QUOTE]
Ok ... shooting is bad. What about drowning?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Jo_Kopechne
[/QUOTE]
Ok ... shooting is bad. What about drowning?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mary_Jo_Kopechne
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Rip Van Winkle wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhoun wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Very good question. If the Democrats here in America could actually come up with an idea rather than their brand of venom and hatred, they could perhaps win an election or two....
Short of that, I don't know what it will take. I thought 9/11 would bring us together, but that lasted about 2 1/2 weeks, then the idiots like Pelosi and Kennedy started popping off....[/QUOTE]
Another fine example of a fascist in his purest form. I suppose you'd have all Democrats shot if you had your way, hmm? Need I remind you that
a) the most corrupt presidency ever (Harding)
b) the only president ever to to be removed from office (Nixon)
c) the president with the largest toll of dead American soldiers on his conto (Nixon)
Were all Republicans? And there's more than just this. It's just the tip of the iceberg.[/QUOTE]
Fascist??? for suggesting the Democrats have no ideas? Talk about hyperbole.
The Democrats could have done much better than the "defeat Bush" rhetoric of Gore or Kerry. Even Howard Dean would have been better. At least he had ideas, although he is a bit of a flake.[/QUOTE]
On one side we have Democrats who have no ideas, and then we have Republicans who only have ideas that benefit themselves, their cronies, and the wealthy people who finance their political campaigns.
BOTTOM LINE: Both parties SUCK!
Short of that, I don't know what it will take. I thought 9/11 would bring us together, but that lasted about 2 1/2 weeks, then the idiots like Pelosi and Kennedy started popping off....[/QUOTE]
Another fine example of a fascist in his purest form. I suppose you'd have all Democrats shot if you had your way, hmm? Need I remind you that
a) the most corrupt presidency ever (Harding)
b) the only president ever to to be removed from office (Nixon)
c) the president with the largest toll of dead American soldiers on his conto (Nixon)
Were all Republicans? And there's more than just this. It's just the tip of the iceberg.[/QUOTE]
Fascist??? for suggesting the Democrats have no ideas? Talk about hyperbole.
The Democrats could have done much better than the "defeat Bush" rhetoric of Gore or Kerry. Even Howard Dean would have been better. At least he had ideas, although he is a bit of a flake.[/QUOTE]
On one side we have Democrats who have no ideas, and then we have Republicans who only have ideas that benefit themselves, their cronies, and the wealthy people who finance their political campaigns.
BOTTOM LINE: Both parties SUCK!
I am hoping that the Republican party will improve somewhat if McCain becomes the Republican nominee for president in 2008. I voted for McCain in the 2000 Republican presidential primary, and I will vote for him again in 2008.
I voted for McCain as well....
I'll give you the same answers I gave the GOP survey
Q: Did you vote in 2000?
A: No, 11 year olds cannot vote
Q: Did you vote in 2002?
A: No, 13 year olds cannot vote
Q: Did you vote in 2004?
A: No, 15 year olds cannot vote
You'd think theyd get the message.
Q: Did you vote in 2000?
A: No, 11 year olds cannot vote
Q: Did you vote in 2002?
A: No, 13 year olds cannot vote
Q: Did you vote in 2004?
A: No, 15 year olds cannot vote
You'd think theyd get the message.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
c) the president with the largest toll of dead American soldiers on his conto (Nixon)
Were all Republicans? And there's more than just this. It's just the tip of the iceberg.[/QUOTE]
That hit me as a very incorrect statement, then I found proof (see link below). It would help your arguements, I you were to provide proof of what you say. Also, the Vietnam War started several years before Richard Nixon was elected. If I recall correctly, JFK was the first president to send troops to Vietnam. Please, pin more faults to the coats of Republican Presidents. I dare you.
http://members.aol.com/usregistry/allwars.htm
Thomas, you should be happy to hear this. Every 20 years, except for Reagan, the president has died in office. This trend started in 1840 with William Harrison. 1860, Lincoln. 1880, Garfield. 1900, McKinley. 1920, Harding. 1940, Roosevelt. 1960, Kennedy. 1980, the only exception so far. 2000, Bush?
c) the president with the largest toll of dead American soldiers on his conto (Nixon)
Were all Republicans? And there's more than just this. It's just the tip of the iceberg.[/QUOTE]
That hit me as a very incorrect statement, then I found proof (see link below). It would help your arguements, I you were to provide proof of what you say. Also, the Vietnam War started several years before Richard Nixon was elected. If I recall correctly, JFK was the first president to send troops to Vietnam. Please, pin more faults to the coats of Republican Presidents. I dare you.
http://members.aol.com/usregistry/allwars.htm
Thomas, you should be happy to hear this. Every 20 years, except for Reagan, the president has died in office. This trend started in 1840 with William Harrison. 1860, Lincoln. 1880, Garfield. 1900, McKinley. 1920, Harding. 1940, Roosevelt. 1960, Kennedy. 1980, the only exception so far. 2000, Bush?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]yamaha wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
c) the president with the largest toll of dead American soldiers on his conto (Nixon)
Were all Republicans? And there's more than just this. It's just the tip of the iceberg.[/QUOTE]
That hit me as a very incorrect statement, then I found proof (see link below). It would help your arguements, I you were to provide proof of what you say. Also, the Vietnam War started several years before Richard Nixon was elected. If I recall correctly, JFK was the first president to send troops to Vietnam. Please, pin more faults to the coats of Republican Presidents. I dare you.
http://members.aol.com/usregistry/allwars.htm
Thomas, you should be happy to hear this. Every 20 years, except for Reagan, the president has died in office. This trend started in 1840 with William Harrison. 1860, Lincoln. 1880, Garfield. 1900, McKinley. 1920, Harding. 1940, Roosevelt. 1960, Kennedy. 1980, the only exception so far. 2000, Bush?
[/QUOTE]
Mr. Quinn has never been one to let the truth stand in to way on one of his short-sighted rants.
c) the president with the largest toll of dead American soldiers on his conto (Nixon)
Were all Republicans? And there's more than just this. It's just the tip of the iceberg.[/QUOTE]
That hit me as a very incorrect statement, then I found proof (see link below). It would help your arguements, I you were to provide proof of what you say. Also, the Vietnam War started several years before Richard Nixon was elected. If I recall correctly, JFK was the first president to send troops to Vietnam. Please, pin more faults to the coats of Republican Presidents. I dare you.
http://members.aol.com/usregistry/allwars.htm
Thomas, you should be happy to hear this. Every 20 years, except for Reagan, the president has died in office. This trend started in 1840 with William Harrison. 1860, Lincoln. 1880, Garfield. 1900, McKinley. 1920, Harding. 1940, Roosevelt. 1960, Kennedy. 1980, the only exception so far. 2000, Bush?
[/QUOTE]
Mr. Quinn has never been one to let the truth stand in to way on one of his short-sighted rants.
One thing I learned from Queenzone is that Rip Van Winkel is the definition of foolishness. He likes to "quote" you than change the words and give it another interpretation, and half of the times he concludes your a racist. No metter what you did, wether you spoke german in stead of english or you said someone is a idiot, and that person comes coincidentally from another country.
The real racist is the person who things that.
I'd like to see your name spelled different:
R.I.P. Van Winkel
P.S.
I bet he's now going to accuse me of death threats XD
The real racist is the person who things that.
I'd like to see your name spelled different:
R.I.P. Van Winkel
P.S.
I bet he's now going to accuse me of death threats XD