For those who haven't yet seen it, here is a new and incredibly fascinating and seemingly convincing documentary about the 9-11 attacks on the World Trade Center. It is basically showing clues of how the government was completely behind the attacks as a means for the USA to regain power in certain parts of the world. I need to watch it a couple more times before I'm fully convinced, but after one viewing, I found so many things that seem so impossible to refute.
This is surely going to upset some people, but it can only inevitably lead to more people seeing some truths about the Bush administration. But of course, I expect the usual republicans here to dismiss this documentary as left-wing propaganda. Personally, I see this documentary as somewhat of a "preaching to the converted" in comparison to Fahrenheit 911, but unlike Michael Moore's approach, there are absolutely no exaggerations of any kind to be found.
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-2023320890224991194
Watch, and discuss - RATIONALLY. No death threats or other personal attacks, please.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Interesting... FINALLY!!!
I thought that from the beginning, but 99% of the people I told would laugh in my face. So it's my turn to laugh back now. ^,^
I thought that from the beginning, but 99% of the people I told would laugh in my face. So it's my turn to laugh back now. ^,^
Absolute, total crap. Yes I'm one of the 99% that will laugh at you for believing it.
Well, I've seen a Dutch documentary about this once.. they had very convincing evidence that there actually was a conspiracy!
And what would be the advantage the Bush administration has derived from this so-called conspiracy???
Guys, you're so busy applying political correctness that you seem to lose common sense.
Be careful though. Being critical of our own leaders is OK and necessary. Being understanding with terrorists is another thing. They will not return the favor.
Guys, you're so busy applying political correctness that you seem to lose common sense.
Be careful though. Being critical of our own leaders is OK and necessary. Being understanding with terrorists is another thing. They will not return the favor.
i am sorry to say so, but I find this documentary very plausable ... There are too many things that don't add up ...
I start dislike mr Bush some more, since I do think there is a big truth in this documentary ...
Stefan
PS I dont know if you've heard about the comments of the venezulean president regarding G.W. Bush, but I am sorry to say so, I agree with his opinion. It sounds harsh, and this forum is not really for political views, but in my opinion GW Bush is a worst person than many of history's dicators ...
I start dislike mr Bush some more, since I do think there is a big truth in this documentary ...
Stefan
PS I dont know if you've heard about the comments of the venezulean president regarding G.W. Bush, but I am sorry to say so, I agree with his opinion. It sounds harsh, and this forum is not really for political views, but in my opinion GW Bush is a worst person than many of history's dicators ...
The PC I am on will not allow to download.
Is There anyone who knows how to save the file so I can watch it later in windows - or better still save the file to torrent or rapidshare?
Is There anyone who knows how to save the file so I can watch it later in windows - or better still save the file to torrent or rapidshare?
And what advantage has this war brought to Bush and friends? If you're thinking of oil and control over Iraq and Afghanistan, of course it's clear that it would have been easier to just strike deals with those dictators.
Thanks Barry.
Any way any format would be great.
Rapidshare, Torrent, all sounds good.
Thanks
Any way any format would be great.
Rapidshare, Torrent, all sounds good.
Thanks
It will be bull shit in any format. LOL LOL
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Fairy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Absolute, total crap. Yes I'm one of the 99% that will laugh at you for believing it.[/QUOTE]
Did you actually watch the documentary in its entirety, and intellectually consider the possibilities it brought forth - before denouncing it as total crap?
[QUOTE]And what advantage has this war brought to Bush and friends?[/QUOTE]
Control, control, and more control. History has clearly shown that the United States craves nothing more than control. Pearl Harbour gave the USA a damn good reason to use the military as they did in from the 40s to the 70s, and in the 21st century, they needed another reason. Just look at the evidence:
Stocks being sold like crazy on September 9th and 10th 2001
Zero evidence of an airplane hitting the pentagon, not to mention, authorities trying to cover it up by not telling anyone what the airplane is composed of... they knew if any scientist was aware of the materials, they could easily conclude that the "airplane disintegrating" was scientifically impossible. But thankfully, known materials in the propellers of such an aircraft have given us all the evidence we need. There was no airplane!
And, all government workers in the World Trade Center getting the day off on 9/11...
Come on, it's blindingly obvious - to those who have the willingness to see it that way.
[QUOTE]If you're thinking of oil and control over Iraq and Afghanistan, of course it's clear that it would have been easier to just strike deals with those dictators.[/QUOTE]
Ha, you make dealing with a dictator sound like an easy thing to do. Even aside from that, there is no longer a dictator named Saddam Hussein in control of Iraq, yet the USA are still there. While many will say the soldiers are there to "liberate the Iraqi people", might I point out the interesting polls that were taken of Iraqi people about a year ago, and about 80% of them said it was worse in 2005 than it was under Saddam.
It's totally obvious... you don't want to even entertain the possibility of 9/11 being a government-orchestrated event... out of fear? It's not like you're alone; there are a hundred million people in your shoes. But most of them are American. There are very few people outside the US (and the UK, I guess) who are so pro-Bush as you are.
Did you actually watch the documentary in its entirety, and intellectually consider the possibilities it brought forth - before denouncing it as total crap?
[QUOTE]And what advantage has this war brought to Bush and friends?[/QUOTE]
Control, control, and more control. History has clearly shown that the United States craves nothing more than control. Pearl Harbour gave the USA a damn good reason to use the military as they did in from the 40s to the 70s, and in the 21st century, they needed another reason. Just look at the evidence:
Stocks being sold like crazy on September 9th and 10th 2001
Zero evidence of an airplane hitting the pentagon, not to mention, authorities trying to cover it up by not telling anyone what the airplane is composed of... they knew if any scientist was aware of the materials, they could easily conclude that the "airplane disintegrating" was scientifically impossible. But thankfully, known materials in the propellers of such an aircraft have given us all the evidence we need. There was no airplane!
And, all government workers in the World Trade Center getting the day off on 9/11...
Come on, it's blindingly obvious - to those who have the willingness to see it that way.
[QUOTE]If you're thinking of oil and control over Iraq and Afghanistan, of course it's clear that it would have been easier to just strike deals with those dictators.[/QUOTE]
Ha, you make dealing with a dictator sound like an easy thing to do. Even aside from that, there is no longer a dictator named Saddam Hussein in control of Iraq, yet the USA are still there. While many will say the soldiers are there to "liberate the Iraqi people", might I point out the interesting polls that were taken of Iraqi people about a year ago, and about 80% of them said it was worse in 2005 than it was under Saddam.
It's totally obvious... you don't want to even entertain the possibility of 9/11 being a government-orchestrated event... out of fear? It's not like you're alone; there are a hundred million people in your shoes. But most of them are American. There are very few people outside the US (and the UK, I guess) who are so pro-Bush as you are.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Fairy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Absolute, total crap. Yes I'm one of the 99% that will laugh at you for believing it.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE]And what advantage has this war brought to Bush and friends?[/QUOTE]
Control, control, and more control. History has clearly shown that the United States craves nothing more than control. Pearl Harbour gave the USA a damn good reason to use the military as they did in from the 40s to the 70s, and in the 21st century, they needed another reason. Just look at the evidence:
[/QUOTE]
Actually, if I recall my history correctly, British intelligence knew of the impending attack on Pearl Harbour BEFORE it took place.
Churchill therefore faced two choices:
First: Warn the US of the communique intercepted by UK naval intellegence. (Thus saving hundreds of American lives).
Second: Do nothing, and sit on the info.
Regardless of how patriotic we Brits feel about our country, Churchill knew that we would eventually get our arse kicked in Europe without US aid. Unfortunately, the US did not wish to get involved in a European war. By following the second course of action, Churchill knew that the US would be dragged kicking and screaming into a world-wide conflict.
So Churchill - murdering bastard, or military genius? History reports the latter, so (having not viewed the video) there could be more than a grain of truth in the 'control' theory.
[QUOTE]And what advantage has this war brought to Bush and friends?[/QUOTE]
Control, control, and more control. History has clearly shown that the United States craves nothing more than control. Pearl Harbour gave the USA a damn good reason to use the military as they did in from the 40s to the 70s, and in the 21st century, they needed another reason. Just look at the evidence:
[/QUOTE]
Actually, if I recall my history correctly, British intelligence knew of the impending attack on Pearl Harbour BEFORE it took place.
Churchill therefore faced two choices:
First: Warn the US of the communique intercepted by UK naval intellegence. (Thus saving hundreds of American lives).
Second: Do nothing, and sit on the info.
Regardless of how patriotic we Brits feel about our country, Churchill knew that we would eventually get our arse kicked in Europe without US aid. Unfortunately, the US did not wish to get involved in a European war. By following the second course of action, Churchill knew that the US would be dragged kicking and screaming into a world-wide conflict.
So Churchill - murdering bastard, or military genius? History reports the latter, so (having not viewed the video) there could be more than a grain of truth in the 'control' theory.
Before criticizing these conspiricy theories, actually sit and watch this.
I'm only half way though at the moment, but it does raise some real questions. The most suspicious thing of all being the pentagon attack.
I'm only half way though at the moment, but it does raise some real questions. The most suspicious thing of all being the pentagon attack.
'Regardless of how patriotic we Brits feel about our country, Churchill knew that we would eventually get our arse kicked in Europe without US aid. Unfortunately, the US did not wish to get involved in a European war. By following the second course of action, he knew that the US would be dragged kicking and screaming into a world-wide conflict.'
Sorry to go off topic but I disagree totally. Had the US not got involved (militarily)the Allies would still have won, although it may have taken longer. Everybody always forgets the Russians and their overwhelming numbers.
Sorry to go off topic but I disagree totally. Had the US not got involved (militarily)the Allies would still have won, although it may have taken longer. Everybody always forgets the Russians and their overwhelming numbers.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir Archie Leach wrote: [/QUOTENAME]'Regardless of how patriotic we Brits feel about our country, Churchill knew that we would eventually get our arse kicked in Europe without US aid. Unfortunately, the US did not wish to get involved in a European war. By following the second course of action, he knew that the US would be dragged kicking and screaming into a world-wide conflict.'
Sorry to go off topic but I disagree totally. Had the US not got involved (militarily)the Allies would still have won, although it may have taken longer. Everybody always forgets the Russians and their overwhelming numbers.[/QUOTE]
Possible, but this does not negate the fact that Churchill knew about the attack before hand, and chose to keep that information secret because it would sting the US into the war.
That much you have to agree with.
Sorry to go off topic but I disagree totally. Had the US not got involved (militarily)the Allies would still have won, although it may have taken longer. Everybody always forgets the Russians and their overwhelming numbers.[/QUOTE]
Possible, but this does not negate the fact that Churchill knew about the attack before hand, and chose to keep that information secret because it would sting the US into the war.
That much you have to agree with.