[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=blk>Sasha wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Hey!!!
Football is not soccer!
Football is football.
And I DO NOT have an accent
[/QUOTE]
Football is the name given to a sport in which 22 players from 2 teams kick a ball around with their feet. Hence the name "foot - ball".
22 guys carrying a ball in their hands while bumping into each other like a bunch of retards IS NOT football.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=blk>Sasha wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Hey!!!
Football is not soccer!
Football is football.
And I DO NOT have an accent
[/QUOTE]
Football is the name given to a sport in which 22 players from 2 teams kick a ball around with their feet. Hence the name "foot - ball".
22 guys carrying a ball in their hands while bumping into each other like a bunch of retards IS NOT football.[/QUOTE]
Very wise words ;)
1. POLAND- well, of course...!
2. NETHERLANDS- always loved them, still remember the team with Van Basten, Gullit, Rijkaard, Koeman brothers, Van Breukelen...
3. CZECH REPUBLIC- I just love the way they play... seriously, they have one of the strongest midfield out there- Grygera, Nedved, Poborsky, Rosicky... If Baros or (preferably AND) Koller will get there... they will go far... And does anybody remember Thomas Skuhravy at Italia 1990?
4. BRAZIL- but only recently and ONLY because I'm a Bracelona fan and Ronaldinho is such a genius :)
5. ROMANIA- but not nowadays... the team with Hagi, Dumitrescu, Raducioiu...
The teams i DON'T LIKE (because of the way they play football) are GERMANY (too boring), Italy (it's anti-football), Spain (impotence, always lose when it amtters) and England (see: Spain + they think they already are the best, but... not with this manager, nope...)
Football is not soccer!
Football is football.
And I DO NOT have an accent
[/QUOTE]
Football is the name given to a sport in which 22 players from 2 teams kick a ball around with their feet. Hence the name "foot - ball".
22 guys carrying a ball in their hands while bumping into each other like a bunch of retards IS NOT football.[/QUOTE]
Very wise words ;)
1. POLAND- well, of course...!
2. NETHERLANDS- always loved them, still remember the team with Van Basten, Gullit, Rijkaard, Koeman brothers, Van Breukelen...
3. CZECH REPUBLIC- I just love the way they play... seriously, they have one of the strongest midfield out there- Grygera, Nedved, Poborsky, Rosicky... If Baros or (preferably AND) Koller will get there... they will go far... And does anybody remember Thomas Skuhravy at Italia 1990?
4. BRAZIL- but only recently and ONLY because I'm a Bracelona fan and Ronaldinho is such a genius :)
5. ROMANIA- but not nowadays... the team with Hagi, Dumitrescu, Raducioiu...
The teams i DON'T LIKE (because of the way they play football) are GERMANY (too boring), Italy (it's anti-football), Spain (impotence, always lose when it amtters) and England (see: Spain + they think they already are the best, but... not with this manager, nope...)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=blk>Sasha wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Hey!!!
Football is not soccer!
Football is football.
And I DO NOT have an accent
[/QUOTE]
Football is the name given to a sport in which 22 players from 2 teams kick a ball around with their feet. Hence the name "foot - ball".
22 guys carrying a ball in their hands while bumping into each other like a bunch of retards IS NOT football.[/QUOTE]
I support you.
The Football was created by british people long time ago, and consist in 22 people running around it.
YANKEE FOOTBALL it is NOT FOOTBALL!!! and Soccer it is not football too. There is ONE kind of Football, and the most beatiful sport in the world.
Football is not soccer!
Football is football.
And I DO NOT have an accent
[/QUOTE]
Football is the name given to a sport in which 22 players from 2 teams kick a ball around with their feet. Hence the name "foot - ball".
22 guys carrying a ball in their hands while bumping into each other like a bunch of retards IS NOT football.[/QUOTE]
I support you.
The Football was created by british people long time ago, and consist in 22 people running around it.
YANKEE FOOTBALL it is NOT FOOTBALL!!! and Soccer it is not football too. There is ONE kind of Football, and the most beatiful sport in the world.
Since I'm from Colombia, obviously they're the team that I support.
However, I have to admit that despite having great players for the past 20 years, our main weakness has always been the lack of definition when it comes to goal scoring. Colombians commonly joke that the team is like having an insecure girlfriend. (Too much foreplay and low scoring).
Anyways, I don't normally support teams before a World Cup starts. I usually end up rooting for the underdogs who make it past the first round. Teams like Cameroon 1990, Romania 1994, Croatia 1998, or Turkey 2002, are the kind of teams I always end up supporting.
However I commonly find myself rooting for Brazil, England, and Portugal.
However, I have to admit that despite having great players for the past 20 years, our main weakness has always been the lack of definition when it comes to goal scoring. Colombians commonly joke that the team is like having an insecure girlfriend. (Too much foreplay and low scoring).
Anyways, I don't normally support teams before a World Cup starts. I usually end up rooting for the underdogs who make it past the first round. Teams like Cameroon 1990, Romania 1994, Croatia 1998, or Turkey 2002, are the kind of teams I always end up supporting.
However I commonly find myself rooting for Brazil, England, and Portugal.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Since I'm from Colombia, obviously they're the team that I support.
However, I have to admit that despite having great players for the past 20 years, our main weakness has always been the lack of definition when it comes to goal scoring. Colombians joke commonly that the team is having an insecure girlfriend. (Too much foreplay and low scoring).
Anyways, I don't normally support teams before a World Cup starts. I usually end up rooting for the underdogs who make it past the first round. Teams like Cameroon 1990, Romania 1994, Croatia 1998, or Turkey 2002, are the kind of teams I always end up supporting.
However I commonly find myself rooting for Brazil, England, and Portugal.[/QUOTE]
How forget Tino Asprilla (he played in my favourite chilean team), Pibe Valderrama, Alvarez, Rincón, the 0-5 against Argentina in Buenos Aires, that was spectacular.
And obviously i support my country (Chile), but i don't know what will happen now...
We cannot fail to take advantage of to the next generation of great players that comes... hopefully goes away Reinaldo Sanchez of the Federation, thus is the only form that we pruned to go to the World Cup of South Africa 2010.
However, I have to admit that despite having great players for the past 20 years, our main weakness has always been the lack of definition when it comes to goal scoring. Colombians joke commonly that the team is having an insecure girlfriend. (Too much foreplay and low scoring).
Anyways, I don't normally support teams before a World Cup starts. I usually end up rooting for the underdogs who make it past the first round. Teams like Cameroon 1990, Romania 1994, Croatia 1998, or Turkey 2002, are the kind of teams I always end up supporting.
However I commonly find myself rooting for Brazil, England, and Portugal.[/QUOTE]
How forget Tino Asprilla (he played in my favourite chilean team), Pibe Valderrama, Alvarez, Rincón, the 0-5 against Argentina in Buenos Aires, that was spectacular.
And obviously i support my country (Chile), but i don't know what will happen now...
We cannot fail to take advantage of to the next generation of great players that comes... hopefully goes away Reinaldo Sanchez of the Federation, thus is the only form that we pruned to go to the World Cup of South Africa 2010.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="blue">Maruga_Mercury</font> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Since I'm from Colombia, obviously they're the team that I support.
However, I have to admit that despite having great players for the past 20 years, our main weakness has always been the lack of definition when it comes to goal scoring. Colombians joke commonly that the team is having an insecure girlfriend. (Too much foreplay and low scoring).
Anyways, I don't normally support teams before a World Cup starts. I usually end up rooting for the underdogs who make it past the first round. Teams like Cameroon 1990, Romania 1994, Croatia 1998, or Turkey 2002, are the kind of teams I always end up supporting.
However I commonly find myself rooting for Brazil, England, and Portugal.[/QUOTE]
How forget Tino Asprilla (he played in my favourite chilean team), Pibe Valderrama, Alvarez, Rincón, the 0-5 against Argentina in Buenos Aires, that was spectacular.
And obviously i support my country (Chile), but i don't know what will happen now...
We cannot fail to take advantage of to the next generation of great players that comes... hopefully goes away Reinaldo Sanchez of the Federation, thus is the only form that we pruned to go to the World Cup of South Africa 2010.[/QUOTE]
Colombia only had top quality strikers when Asprilla and Valencia were at the top of their game. However, that didn't last more than 2 or 3 years.
Zamorano and Salas remained Chile's top strikers for a far longer time. The guys weren't just good strikers, they were world class strikers. They were the kind strikers that were an imminent threat once they had the ball on the goalkeeper's area.
I'm sure they must be missed in Chile as much as Valderrama is missed in Colombia.
However, I have to admit that despite having great players for the past 20 years, our main weakness has always been the lack of definition when it comes to goal scoring. Colombians joke commonly that the team is having an insecure girlfriend. (Too much foreplay and low scoring).
Anyways, I don't normally support teams before a World Cup starts. I usually end up rooting for the underdogs who make it past the first round. Teams like Cameroon 1990, Romania 1994, Croatia 1998, or Turkey 2002, are the kind of teams I always end up supporting.
However I commonly find myself rooting for Brazil, England, and Portugal.[/QUOTE]
How forget Tino Asprilla (he played in my favourite chilean team), Pibe Valderrama, Alvarez, Rincón, the 0-5 against Argentina in Buenos Aires, that was spectacular.
And obviously i support my country (Chile), but i don't know what will happen now...
We cannot fail to take advantage of to the next generation of great players that comes... hopefully goes away Reinaldo Sanchez of the Federation, thus is the only form that we pruned to go to the World Cup of South Africa 2010.[/QUOTE]
Colombia only had top quality strikers when Asprilla and Valencia were at the top of their game. However, that didn't last more than 2 or 3 years.
Zamorano and Salas remained Chile's top strikers for a far longer time. The guys weren't just good strikers, they were world class strikers. They were the kind strikers that were an imminent threat once they had the ball on the goalkeeper's area.
I'm sure they must be missed in Chile as much as Valderrama is missed in Colombia.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=black>Andy<font color=red>38 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]JamieSureWould<br><font size=1>QOQOW wrote: [/QUOTENAME]does it have to 5 because i only know one basically :S ....
england [/QUOTE]
Ohhhh did you see that Celtic beat Rangers last weekend? muhahahahaha[/QUOTE]
no i didnt seeing as i live in the US
muhahahahahahah
england [/QUOTE]
Ohhhh did you see that Celtic beat Rangers last weekend? muhahahahaha[/QUOTE]
no i didnt seeing as i live in the US
muhahahahahahah
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="blue">Maruga_Mercury</font> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Since I'm from Colombia, obviously they're the team that I support.
However, I have to admit that despite having great players for the past 20 years, our main weakness has always been the lack of definition when it comes to goal scoring. Colombians joke commonly that the team is having an insecure girlfriend. (Too much foreplay and low scoring).
Anyways, I don't normally support teams before a World Cup starts. I usually end up rooting for the underdogs who make it past the first round. Teams like Cameroon 1990, Romania 1994, Croatia 1998, or Turkey 2002, are the kind of teams I always end up supporting.
However I commonly find myself rooting for Brazil, England, and Portugal.[/QUOTE]
How forget Tino Asprilla (he played in my favourite chilean team), Pibe Valderrama, Alvarez, Rincón, the 0-5 against Argentina in Buenos Aires, that was spectacular.
And obviously i support my country (Chile), but i don't know what will happen now...
We cannot fail to take advantage of to the next generation of great players that comes... hopefully goes away Reinaldo Sanchez of the Federation, thus is the only form that we pruned to go to the World Cup of South Africa 2010.[/QUOTE]
Colombia only had top quality strikers when Asprilla and Valencia were at the top of their game. However, that didn't last more than 2 or 3 years.
Zamorano and Salas remained Chile's top strikers for a far longer time. The guys weren't just good strikers, they were world class strikers. They were the kind strikers that were an imminent threat once they had the ball on the goalkeeper's area.
I'm sure they must be missed in Chile as much as Valderrama is missed in Colombia.[/QUOTE]
I like Salas more than Zamorano, and of course Salas will play until (at least) one year more.
Zamorano only won with Real Madrid, Internazionale and América de México, but Salas won with Universidad de Chile, River Plate, Lazio and Juventus... also Salas was the best player in America.
However, I have to admit that despite having great players for the past 20 years, our main weakness has always been the lack of definition when it comes to goal scoring. Colombians joke commonly that the team is having an insecure girlfriend. (Too much foreplay and low scoring).
Anyways, I don't normally support teams before a World Cup starts. I usually end up rooting for the underdogs who make it past the first round. Teams like Cameroon 1990, Romania 1994, Croatia 1998, or Turkey 2002, are the kind of teams I always end up supporting.
However I commonly find myself rooting for Brazil, England, and Portugal.[/QUOTE]
How forget Tino Asprilla (he played in my favourite chilean team), Pibe Valderrama, Alvarez, Rincón, the 0-5 against Argentina in Buenos Aires, that was spectacular.
And obviously i support my country (Chile), but i don't know what will happen now...
We cannot fail to take advantage of to the next generation of great players that comes... hopefully goes away Reinaldo Sanchez of the Federation, thus is the only form that we pruned to go to the World Cup of South Africa 2010.[/QUOTE]
Colombia only had top quality strikers when Asprilla and Valencia were at the top of their game. However, that didn't last more than 2 or 3 years.
Zamorano and Salas remained Chile's top strikers for a far longer time. The guys weren't just good strikers, they were world class strikers. They were the kind strikers that were an imminent threat once they had the ball on the goalkeeper's area.
I'm sure they must be missed in Chile as much as Valderrama is missed in Colombia.[/QUOTE]
I like Salas more than Zamorano, and of course Salas will play until (at least) one year more.
Zamorano only won with Real Madrid, Internazionale and América de México, but Salas won with Universidad de Chile, River Plate, Lazio and Juventus... also Salas was the best player in America.