[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mircrowave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I agree, there IS life after freddie. Unfortunately those bands didn't really support the argument.[/QUOTE]
- in your opinion.
Don't throw your opinion out in the open and present it as fact. These bands have sold a hell of a lot of records, so they must be doing something right.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
hey now, oasis are great noel gallegher is rock n roll. queen forever!
Let's all get over it. It's 2006, not 1975 anymore. The music changes. Time changes. People change.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Hadrian wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Let's all get over it. It's 2006, not 1975 anymore. The music changes. Time changes. People change.[/QUOTE]
Not always for the better.
Not always for the better.
nothing changes. there's no beginning there's no ending.................
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=Orange>A Winter's Tale wrote: [/QUOTENAME]People are blind to beauty.[/QUOTE]
True, I think that their later material is absolutely brilliant. So pure...great guitar...vocals....ok it's all great, just put it that way.
True, I think that their later material is absolutely brilliant. So pure...great guitar...vocals....ok it's all great, just put it that way.
I don't like The Miracle.
Not the album, the song. A lot of the songs on The Miracle are good, but IMO the title track is not so good.
Not the album, the song. A lot of the songs on The Miracle are good, but IMO the title track is not so good.
I agree.Queen wern't getting the chart success they deserved but queen had been around for nearly 20 years at this point and your forgetting that artist's like George Michael and Gun's n rose's were rising up and gaining more fame and chart success at this point.
Music artists are like boxers,there only best when they have potetial.
Music artists are like boxers,there only best when they have potetial.
and anyways music charts are full of CRAP these days!.
How can 50 cent Get number 1 after number 1!?
He is a daft twat!
ALL HIS SONGS ARE ABOUT ARE PIMPING,WHORES AND PARTYING!
But at least music back in the 70's and 80's was decent and actually had a bit of passion in them.
How can 50 cent Get number 1 after number 1!?
He is a daft twat!
ALL HIS SONGS ARE ABOUT ARE PIMPING,WHORES AND PARTYING!
But at least music back in the 70's and 80's was decent and actually had a bit of passion in them.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Angelo_ramerez wrote: [/QUOTENAME]and anyways music charts are full of CRAP these days!.
How can 50 cent Get number 1 after number 1!?
He is a daft twat!
ALL HIS SONGS ARE ABOUT ARE PIMPING,WHORES AND PARTYING!
But at least music back in the 70's and 80's was decent and actually had a bit of passion in them. [/QUOTE]
I agree, rappers like that only influence kids today to be just as bad...if not, worse!
Its a main aspect today why kids are inpolite, rude, alcoholics, criminals, pregnant at 16, drug addicts, etc.
If they had to listen to Queen they'd be most likely highly intelligent, artistic, free-spirited people who appreciate real music!
How can 50 cent Get number 1 after number 1!?
He is a daft twat!
ALL HIS SONGS ARE ABOUT ARE PIMPING,WHORES AND PARTYING!
But at least music back in the 70's and 80's was decent and actually had a bit of passion in them. [/QUOTE]
I agree, rappers like that only influence kids today to be just as bad...if not, worse!
Its a main aspect today why kids are inpolite, rude, alcoholics, criminals, pregnant at 16, drug addicts, etc.
If they had to listen to Queen they'd be most likely highly intelligent, artistic, free-spirited people who appreciate real music!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Angelo_ramerez wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I agree.Queen wern't getting the chart success they deserved but queen had been around for nearly 20 years at this point and your forgetting that artist's like George Michael and Gun's n rose's were rising up and gaining more fame and chart success at this point.
Music artists are like boxers,there only best when they have potetial.
[/QUOTE]
I disagree with you- Queen were from fading at this point for reasons i've already given.
Music artists are like boxers,there only best when they have potetial.
[/QUOTE]
I disagree with you- Queen were from fading at this point for reasons i've already given.
I do agree with you. You should be called Dr.Asterik!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mircrowave wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I think the music was too intense for radio, especially songs like Innuendo. And Queen certainly wasn't "eye candy" in their later years, which seems to be a requirement to get any kind of airplay or promotion.[/QUOTE]
What?!
Queen were ALWAYS "eye candy"! ;)
What?!
Queen were ALWAYS "eye candy"! ;)
The one song that kind of spoils it for me is My Baby Does Me. Thats my killer for the album.
But to the real question, they never had a tour -and if they did, Im sure it would have been higher rated.
But to the real question, they never had a tour -and if they did, Im sure it would have been higher rated.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]KensingtonLove(Dharankanawala) wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
What?!
Queen were ALWAYS "eye candy"! ;)[/QUOTE]
My thoughts exactly! :-)
What?!
Queen were ALWAYS "eye candy"! ;)[/QUOTE]
My thoughts exactly! :-)