Queen crest Queenzone

Let's think of a new band name for Brian May, Roger Taylor and Paul Rodgers

50 posts Page 3 of 4
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
Never Will Be The Same
That's in my name.
wallpaPRs
I don't wanna be the prrrresident of America
do you hear that listen...........................

























YAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWWN

BORING BORING BORING!!!!!!!
"Queen Minus Good Vocals"
Wear a rubber next time Freddie =(
Maybe "King", now that Freddie is gone?
This is what you wanted, this is what you're going to get.
i think the starter of the topic meant a non-queen, bad company, or free related name.

maybe a name like Geezer Blues? (thats not a pun by the way)
"I am Jack The Pumpkin King!" - Jack The Pumpkin King
The Pension Boys

TOO OLD TO ROCK

AFTER WE WERE FAMOUS

IN IT FOR MONEY

DINOSAUR BOYS

ROCKERS R US + GIMP

BLUE RINSE BRIGADE
Paul Rodgers - "Gimp Of The Year 2006"
FAT BOTTOMED BOYS

THE LOSERS IN THE END
LOL. You can't help but laugh at 'Losers In The End'.
Insert stupid signature here
hey...

"QUEEN + PAUL RODGERS... THE MUSICAL COMEDY"...


THAT SUCKS...

I preffer Queen + Paul Rodgers... I like it...
LORD OF ALL DARKNESS... QUEEN OF THE NIGHT...
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Freddie_Jr. wrote: [/QUOTENAME]"Queen Minus Good Vocals"[/QUOTE]

Paul generally sings better than Freddie did at most Queen concerts. He may not have Freddie's stage presence, but he has a bigger vocal range on stage, and is more vocally consistent overall.

As for the band name, I'd say we call it Queen + Paul Rodgers. It is logical. It's the remaining members plus someone else, rather than including someone else.

When Roger Waters left Pink Floyd, I don't think they even thought of calling it GilmourWrightMason. Imagine if Chicago had done something like that in the 80s with its five remaining members. This is ridiculous. A name is a name. What matters is the music. I can't believe how much time has been devoted to this overall useless discussion.
Queenzone is overrun with trolls and circling the drain - join us here instead: http://queenforum.net
"Paul generally sings better than Freddie did at most Queen concerts. He may not have Freddie's stage presence, but he has a bigger vocal range on stage, and is more vocally consistent overall."

See when I say stuff like this, people jump down my throat, but it's absolutely true - on good nights when their vocals are in top nick, PR and Freddie Mercury *both* sound incredible.

TYMD at Fancourt anyone? What about Somebody to Love at MK??
2 examples of why they're both great singers (on their best nights) and why I'm right. Hahaha.
I think "Royal Company". Sounds like a plan....
"Either this kid has a lightbulb up his ass or his colon has a great idea"
ROGER BRIAN AND THAT OLD GUY FROM FREE!!!!!

LOL
"Losers in the end", ha, ha, it's very funny, i don't know a name but i know that it can't be Queen anymore, beacuose widought Freddie (he was the most inportant in group) and John offcourse, Queen is not exist anymore, Widout my dear Freddie Queen is not Queen, Queen died on day when Freddie died, and now, Queen and Freddie are gone, they're just in our minds and hearts!!!
They're just Brian May, Roger Taylor and Paul Rodgers, he can't replay Freddie, and John is not with them.... so there isn't Queen anymore! I'm sad for this what I wrote, but that is true, and my opinion is that they shoud stop pretending that they're famous rock stars or something like that, beacouse they WAS rock stars... they aren't anymore!! i think that they shoud live their lives like they lived for last 15 years and stop ruining our memories!!! They was something, and now they are nothing, specialy widought my dear FREDDIE..… who agree with my??

Freddie, i'll love you always!!!!!
Tea