New song, "Take love" new or old?

"We call it "Take Love". I don't know for sure what Paul will want the official title to be, when it becomes 'a record'.

We'll be giving it another airing tonight !

I like the song .... it has that deceptively simple "not trying too hard" catchiness that many of Paul's classics had in the old days. But it's fresh - and tells a story. It's great fun to play ....still evolving, so still fun to try things on".




That was what Brian said, so does that mean it's a new song never before heard? or is it an old PR song? And that quote about 'a record' YES!!!!!! brilliant new 'live' or new studio!!!!!!!?

Replying to me... and anyone that is interested, after som research it would appear that it was written for the Q+PR project, therefore will probably end up on the NEW ALBUM!!!!!!!!

WHOOOO Long live Queen, long live Queen+ Paul Rodgers!

does "some research" = "re-reading the perfectly clear original"?

it's very very new

"It has that deceptively simple "not trying too hard" catchiness that many of Paul's classics had in the old days"

I think Brian means it's the same riff repeated a couple of hundred times with a boring verse-chorus-verse-chorus-verse-verse structure like Can't Get Enough and A Little Bit Of Love.

and where can we here this song

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Pim Derks wrote: [/QUOTENAME]"It has that deceptively simple "not trying too hard" catchiness that many of Paul's classics had in the old days"

I think Brian means it's the same riff repeated a couple of hundred times with a boring verse-chorus-verse-chorus-verse-verse structure like Can't Get Enough and A Little Bit Of Love.[/QUOTE]

Well when you write a multi million selling track let me know!

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Thanks wrote: [/QUOTENAME]does "some research" = "re-reading the perfectly clear original"?[/QUOTE]

It must be wonderful to be you!

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Pim Derks wrote: [/QUOTENAME]"It has that deceptively simple "not trying too hard" catchiness that many of Paul's classics had in the old days"

I think Brian means it's the same riff repeated a couple of hundred times with a boring verse-chorus-verse-chorus-verse-verse structure like Can't Get Enough and A Little Bit Of Love.[/QUOTE]

I agree with you, Pim. It sounds just like Paul's other hit songs, not very original at all.
If no one has shared a recording of it by the DC concert, I'll record a clip for you guys (with a digital camera, but thats all I've got)

A song doesn't have to be Bo Rap to be a great song, some of the most successful well crafted songs are really simple, Yesterday, Hey Jude, etc ring any bells?

How can you slag off a song you have never heard? that is a great display of ignorance, just shows what bright balanced individuals these Paul Rodgers haters are!

No no no, friend! Yesterday is not simple. Yes it has Verse+Chorus structure but in each of two parts it has "many" chords. It uses I, VIIb, II, IIImaj, IV, V, VI. And it has a-not-common modulation to VI.

Hey Jude is not simple. Besides many chords, it has also not usual structure. But both songs, yes - very simple to play and to remember the chords.

Besides all of this, the MELODY makes a song. Yes, you could write 3 chords song with just verse+chorus but it would have a beautiful melody. An example - Tavaszi Szél. Paul Rodgers doesn't have a skill for composing. If we talk about Composing with a big letter "C".

Whether you think those examples are simple or not is beside the point,(Yesterday was the first song I learnt to play on guitar how complicated do you think it is?) the fact and my point was a song doesn't have to be complicated to be good or well crafted.

People are commenting on the fact the song is rubbish before they even hear it!

Pauls history would seem to contradict your comments about his ability, I am old enough to remember when he was first around, and I can tell you, his stuff was a big deal back then, people got very excited at the prospect of new releases, and as he has sold a few albums in his time, comments like he doesn't have any abiliity seem moronic, the facts speak for themselves.

My first piano song was Bohemian Rhapsody - from beginning to the end - when I just started playing piano. And it is not simple if you play not just first 3 chords that any kid can play. So, if you really like it, you can start simply with Yesterday because your love to music rules you. It doesn't say anything about Yesterday. For Yesterday you need to learn these 7 chords.

Popularity means nothing. That Paul with his bad company was popular doesn't count anything. It's an american crazyness, an american taste. And how Queen were popular proves what american listeners are. Let's opperate with just our thoughts on what real, great music is for us. Paul is just regular balladeer. OK, - for myself.

"Popularity means nothing. That Paul with his bad company was popular doesn't count anything. It's an american crazyness, an american taste. And how Queen were popular proves what american listeners are. Let's opperate with just our thoughts on what real, great music is for us. Paul is just regular balladeer. OK, - for myself".

What?

read that back and tell me if it makes any sense?

You seem to be good at missing the point, WHICH IS how can you comment on a song you have never heard!