No Rolling Setlist : Is Paul To Blame ?

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]zaiga wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I Personally, I suspect that it is mostly Brian who is afraid of experimenting too much with the setlist. He called the current US setlist "new and exciting". Two new songs! I mean, come on. Also recall his apologies in Sheffield before performing UP, and how the crowd in Brixton had to persuade him to play '39.[/QUOTE]

I would agree here-in Manchester when they first played it in the UK Brian was really apologetic and all...he is a perfectionist.

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson">ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]For fuck's sake, there've only been TWO SHOWS on this tour.

Far too early to say ANYTHING about the setlist.[/QUOTE]

I concur on this one too. Sit back and enjoy the ride!! ;-)

i think we can blame anything that goes wrong on paul

Yeah. But, they had ages. Plently of time to learn 2 or three new songs. Still, beggars can't be choosers. At least there doing something.

Shut up, you whining Prats.

Paul has been reading lyrics off the monitor since this whole thing started.he looks like a newescaster sometimes.

Just wondering what was meant by the crowd persuading him to play '39...like it wasn't rehearsed and he just played it spontaneously?

yes Paul is to blame he ruined everything!!!!!

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhoun wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Shut up, you whining Prats.[/QUOTE]
Don't mistake whining with a critical analysis! :-)
I'm not paying my money to take a trip to the USA, after already seeing them 8 times in Europe, because I don't like what they are doing!

2 of my stocks fell yesterday...Fucking Paul Rodgers!!

Thats it...

Blame George Bush AND Paul Rodgers....

Fantastic.

Its a well-known fact that Paul Rodgers cancelled the original Star Trek in 1969.

Damn him.