Paul can't..? So, who could..?

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=gold>SMI<font color=1>TTY wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Seven_Seas_Of_Rhye II wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Robbie Williams is sucks.[/QUOTE]


That just sounds awkward to me. Just kidding. :-P[/QUOTE]


:-))))) OK, I correct a litle - sucking pig! :-)

[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Serry... wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]great king rat 1138 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Plus he could fly the tour jet and save QPL some money which could be used to sort out the boxsets.[/QUOTE]

:-)[/QUOTE]


:-)

Just imagining what the Queen press-conferences will be :-)

my first choice was Chris Thompson, but i think Paul Rodgers has done an amazing job.

`What about Paul McCartney? ;)

JSS, he so deserves a shot at it and would blow all of the other contenders into the weeds im afraid!

JSS, he so deserves a shot at it and would blow all of the other contenders into the weeds im afraid!

I don't mind Paul Rodgers ,but in a perfect world for me it would be Robert Plant.

Paul can do it, which is why he's with Brian and Roger, sheesh.

If you listened Jeff Scott Soto show at Queen Convention 2003, you know what I'm talking about. He sang all songs which Paul obviously can't. He ROCKED!!!

anyway, he's a better choice then robbie williams...

Paul McCartney! ;D

At this point, Robbie Williams is THE only person capable of being Queen frontman. Why? Well, he's a very good singer, very emotional performer, he's selling out stadiums wherever he comes (and CDs too), a big fan of Queen...Need I say more ? I mean, forget his TT days, look at him now- he is No.1 artist in Europe. Anyway,I vote for Robbie!!!

Sheryl Crow?

Gary Mullen

Listen for yourself

http://www.onenightofqueen.com/media.htm

I'm not really into Gary Mullen.

I would prefer Paul Rodgers over someone with severe idenity crisis.