Learn to read english jackass. It wasn't what you said but the way you said it. You're entitled to your opinion, but if honestly believed you could deliver it in the way you did and not get flamed then you're pretty fucking stupid.
"I didn't think it was anything special" - statement of opinion. Perfectly fine.
"sorry to spoil your party but this tour was not anything special." - reads like a statement of fact. You may think it so, but sorry champ, your useless opinion is anything but fact.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
your right, my opinion isn't fact, but your opinion is just as useless as mine!...My useless opinion says brian and roger are two washed up musicians. Actually it's been downhill for these fellows since november 1991. Queen 1991 RIP.
Yes my opinion is every bit of useless as yours, which is why I didn't give it. The only problem I had was with your attitude.
you don't have to like my attitude, just like I don't like majority of queenzoners attitudes!...It's bullshit that people could say freddie mercury is overated or 80's queen is crap (half their albums) but to put down paul rodgers is forbidden!...is this a queen or paul rodgers site?...I support anything queen, That means from 1971 to 1991. I don't have to be a rodgers lover just because he's working with brian and roger, talk about stefords!...
aaah, i knew it wouldn't last
I don't get it, all these people knocking Queen for going out with Rodgers, would you rather they go away and never be heard from again or what?Ive been a fan for a long time and Ive seen them with Freddie and with Paul and they were all good shows, you got to stop comparing Paul to Freddie ,their not the same nor should they be.It is what it is and really Freddie would be the first to say who gives a shit?just enjoy the fuckn' thing.
I had a great time -- don't get me wrong -- but what exactly does the term 'rolling setlist' mean?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]mike hunt wrote: [/QUOTENAME]...It's bullshit that people could say freddie mercury is overated or 80's queen is crap (half their albums) but to put down paul rodgers is forbidden!...is this a queen or paul rodgers site?...I support anything queen, That means from 1971 to 1991. I don't have to be a rodgers lover just because he's working with brian and roger, talk about stefords!...[/QUOTE]
I completely agree
I completely agree
the closest i came to the queen and paul rogers thing was my exwife saw them she called me after the concert and she was crying,and said it was great,but she never could even remember any of the lyrics so she dosnt know that much about queen except for hearing me play the songs for 23 years i guess if i had still been in atlanta with her i would have seen them but im really glad i didnt see either one,i saw queen 3 times before i know it wasnt as good as before so ill live without.i wish they had stayed home and made a queen album without paul rogers instead im sure roger and brian could come up with something,they must not get along with each other to well or they could make an album with just them 2 or 3 if john can come out of the house
They certainly did in Cleveland where I saw them...When they do another tour w/a new album hopefully more people will join this bandwagon...Paul Rodgers was
awesome!!!!...Cheers!!!
awesome!!!!...Cheers!!!
I have to say I did support the tour it was great fun and to see them again was fantastic, but I'm still on the fence about them recording under the Queen name.It would be interesting to hear what they would come up with but maybe under May, Taylor and Rodgers.
I agree. Having viewed and listened to 'Return of the Champions' on DVD and CD, I can honestly say that this is a great way to keep the Queen spirit alive for younger generations to enjoy. I can't understand why some people dislike it so much.
A studio album would be great too.
A studio album would be great too.
I agree... a May-Rodgers-Taylor project would be great.
I mean... together they work better than alone... and, sincerely a studio version of The Call and Say it's not trye, a better version of Invincible hope and, why not, a studio version of Take Love aren't a good basis for a record?
It would be great to have them sharing lead vocals, as they did in the Queen+PR tour.
I think that fans should encourage them to go on...
... before the dream is over at all.
I mean... together they work better than alone... and, sincerely a studio version of The Call and Say it's not trye, a better version of Invincible hope and, why not, a studio version of Take Love aren't a good basis for a record?
It would be great to have them sharing lead vocals, as they did in the Queen+PR tour.
I think that fans should encourage them to go on...
... before the dream is over at all.