[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]No More Fun wrote: [/QUOTENAME]queen is a live band[/QUOTE]
Er, didn't Queen prefer the studio with the unlimited possibilities?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I prefer live Bohemian Rhapsody because its played faster than the studio version and all of the crowd are singing along to it.
mix both and you have the perfect boheman rhapsody!!!!!!! drums better live...more powerfull
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]zlatan wrote: [/QUOTENAME]mix both and you have the perfect boheman rhapsody!!!!!!! drums better live...more powerfull[/QUOTE]
depends which tour...some drums sounded shite
depends which tour...some drums sounded shite
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=green>Bren<font color=orange>ski wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]zlatan wrote: [/QUOTENAME]mix both and you have the perfect boheman rhapsody!!!!!!! drums better live...more powerfull[/QUOTE]
depends which tour...some drums sounded shite
(don't know how old you are...or even if you saw em live) but if you saw them liev you'll know that on some tours the drums were terrible
[/QUOTE]
depends which tour...some drums sounded shite
(don't know how old you are...or even if you saw em live) but if you saw them liev you'll know that on some tours the drums were terrible
[/QUOTE]
studio version of course
Live for me. Nothing like seeing the dry ice come out after the operatic section.
I think live songs are great!! Queen are so gooooooooooooooooooooooooooooood live!! Of course i love the studio stuff but i think it's nice to hear the crowd and the band adding little extra bits and interacting with the crowd, plus you can imagine you were there with them!
I can't choose between live or studio...but some songs don't sound that well live and some sound better live...
I can't choose between live or studio...but some songs don't sound that well live and some sound better live...
Definately the studio...but the live version is still good because Queen is one of those rare bands that still sounds great live. You know, like you go to those concerts and the person you're listening to doesn't sound anywhere near what they do on the CD's. I mean, a certain amount of difference is understandable, technology can do so much now. But when they edit it so much that it isn't even recognizable as the person anymore.....
Anyway, Studio Version. I actually get goosbumps when I listen to it!
Anyway, Studio Version. I actually get goosbumps when I listen to it!
live......its captures the pain n torture, freddies voice grew stronger over time and it really has that edge to it....studio is good too, but i like live better
definatley studio. you can't get the magnifico layered effect on stage!
Personally, I think every single Queen song is about x300 better when live.
Well, most anyway...it just have more emotion. Look at Crazy Little Thing Called Love, the studio version is ho-hum and quiet and monotonous (yeah, effect I know, but still) while live, it's an insane, twice-as-long, crazy guitar soloed piece of art. Not to mention the audience shouting READY FREDDIE!
Well, most anyway...it just have more emotion. Look at Crazy Little Thing Called Love, the studio version is ho-hum and quiet and monotonous (yeah, effect I know, but still) while live, it's an insane, twice-as-long, crazy guitar soloed piece of art. Not to mention the audience shouting READY FREDDIE!
i love live versions more than studio ones, because of that great energy!!!! ;)
Absolutely Live!!!...I love the studio's version but Freddie's vocals was 1000x better live!!!!...Ciao!!
STUDIO!!!!!!!!