[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]FreMe wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="#FF00CC">its_a_hard_life wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sebastian wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Being fan of a band's music is different from being fan of two ex-band members's immoral decisions.[/QUOTE]
I want to meet ALL of them, not just Brian and Roger. But the fact that they are the most likely ones I would/could meet then yes I would love to meet Brian and Roger again.
[/QUOTE]
again???[/QUOTE]
Yep, again. :-)
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Im a Queen fan have all there albums 13 of there videos 8 dvds 4 t-shirts 26 posters on my bedroom wall have a few books some fanclub mags 3 photos of Freddie Mercury all of Roger,s solo albums Brian solo albums and Freddie solo albums and saw Queen and Paul Rodgers in Dublin last year so ther you have it.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]mercurymay wrote: [/QUOTENAME] True Queen fans share positive info on their favorite band and support their old and new songs,concerts, and anything else related to Queen.It makes me sick to see some people who claim to like or love Queen condemn them for their beliefs,choices that tey made for their careers or lives.
I personally love Queen. Their music was and is still great, loads of talent, good looking and very smart.Freddie's wonderful vocal range, all their awesome writing and musical abilites,Paul's great voice, Brian's totally awesome guitar playing [he makes aguitar sing], and all their other amazing talent. [/QUOTE]
Who are you to decide what a true Queen fan is like?
I personally love Queen. Their music was and is still great, loads of talent, good looking and very smart.Freddie's wonderful vocal range, all their awesome writing and musical abilites,Paul's great voice, Brian's totally awesome guitar playing [he makes aguitar sing], and all their other amazing talent. [/QUOTE]
Who are you to decide what a true Queen fan is like?
By agreeing to everything they do doesn't make you a true fan. It makes you blinded by them. Brainwashed, even.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]DeeEmm wrote: [/QUOTENAME]My definition of Queen is something that includes Freddie Mercury - Queen died when Freddie Mercury did. Made in Heaven was their last album. Anything else after that is not Queen, it's merely 75% or even 50% Queen. I consider No-One But You the last Queen song recorded.[/QUOTE]
You've just contradicted yourself, since No-One But You wasn't recorded with Freddie.
You've just contradicted yourself, since No-One But You wasn't recorded with Freddie.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sebastian wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Being fan of a band's music is different from being fan of two ex-band members's immoral decisions.[/QUOTE]
What has been done that's immortal, exactly?
What has been done that's immortal, exactly?
I like anything QUEEN from 1971-1991.
ANYTHING AFTER 1991, IS NOT QUEEN.
NO FREDDIE, NO JOHN=NO QUEEN!
ANYTHING AFTER 1991, IS NOT QUEEN.
NO FREDDIE, NO JOHN=NO QUEEN!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]jordanjo wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I like anything QUEEN from 1971-1991.
ANYTHING AFTER 1991, IS NOT QUEEN.
NO FREDDIE, NO JOHN=NO QUEEN!
[/QUOTE]
CHEESE.
ANYTHING AFTER 1991, IS NOT QUEEN.
NO FREDDIE, NO JOHN=NO QUEEN!
[/QUOTE]
CHEESE.
CAKE
(Actually I don't like cheesecake)
(Actually I don't like cheesecake)
OK, so Live At Wembley, On Fire: Live at the Bowl and both Greatest Video Hits, all released after 1991, are not Queen?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Nathan wrote: [/QUOTENAME]OK, so Live At Wembley, On Fire: Live at the Bowl and both Greatest Video Hits, all released after 1991, are not Queen? [/QUOTE]
Those were all recorded before 1991
Those were all recorded before 1991
So jordanjo what do you think about the Freddie Mercury Tribute Concert then? That was basically all of them except Freddie, even had Johnny. Don't agree with that eigher?
You guys are acting childish and splitting hairs. All the DVD'S released after Freddies death up till 100 yrs from now that have the original line up is considered Queen. The tour with paul rodgers with john sitting at home is not Queen. A studio album with Bri, Rog and Paul with Danny Marandia, or who ever is not Queen. Like I said yesterday if this line up stays together for 10 or 15 years then you can proberly begin to have the conversation that this could be called Queen, like AC/DC post Bon Scott. I just think that some you just love to nitpick peoples comments.
Once again, I don’t won’t to keep bringing it up, but what if Paul and Ringo went out on a tour and promoted themselves as the Beatles. How would true fans of the Beatles take that? How would fans of George and John take that? Or what it they brought in a front man and promoted it like Queen and Paul Rodgers and called it “The Beatles and (insert name)”. Would the Beatles name fly? Would it be the Beatles or the next best thing to the Beatles? Would true Beatles fans go in throngs to see them? Yes! Did they go in throngs to see Queen and Paul Rodgers? Yes! Is the Beatles as a band no more? Yes. Is the Beatles as a name as far as being in our conscience or making money dead? No. Same thing applies to Queen.
i am true at 12 i av a not big not small but a good queen colaction Paul Rogers (twatx100 stupid joinin queen x10000 mommays boyx100) he is the worst lead singer of queen they could ever have