[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Flashman wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Admittedly, the cover would have been done in crayon and there would have been some glaring omisions. Whole years for instance, but you wouldn't have noticed with a bit of Tippex, or a photo of a naked lady.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Maybe it's really John Deacon.[/QUOTE]
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Flashman wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Here, there's no need for all that - I've only made about 10 posts this year.
Still, that's probably more posts than you've had shags in your life, you illiterate simpleton.[/QUOTE]
lol! Three brilliant posts, all on the same page.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
HAHA I forgot I wrote that.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Under Pressure wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]WhatMustHeThink wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE]Carry on, all you plebs :P[/QUOTE]
Why do I get the feeling that's going to catch on?[/QUOTE]
Because Im brilliant :P
Why do I get the feeling that's going to catch on?[/QUOTE]
Because Im brilliant :P
I'm just amazed that, if as GB says he wants to get as much info from all sources as he can, that he didn't post his request for help on this forum, as well as on bm.com - that seems a bit bloody stupid doesn't it?
e.g. - If you wanted to find out something about KISS, you wouldn't solely ask the webmaster of Ace Freheley's website to post a request for info, but you'd put your request on all (or at the least the premier) fan/collector sites, wouldn't you? This, in the case of Queen, is QZ, so why not post your message here as prominently as possible, or if you don't want help from anyone at all on QZ just because of past personal battles with a small number of members, then why not just use the fantastic sources you already have that supposedly make everyone on QZ seems stupid?
Common sense???
e.g. - If you wanted to find out something about KISS, you wouldn't solely ask the webmaster of Ace Freheley's website to post a request for info, but you'd put your request on all (or at the least the premier) fan/collector sites, wouldn't you? This, in the case of Queen, is QZ, so why not post your message here as prominently as possible, or if you don't want help from anyone at all on QZ just because of past personal battles with a small number of members, then why not just use the fantastic sources you already have that supposedly make everyone on QZ seems stupid?
Common sense???
I may have missed something, but, why do so many people here have such a problem with Greg Brooks? I've been wondering that for some time...
Dan -
Zeni posted these links in another topic about Greg's prior history at QZ.
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=404899&TOPIC_SUBJECT=MY+POINT+OF+VIEW%2C+ON+VARIOUS+THINGS
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=406665&TOPIC_SUBJECT=YourValentine
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=407208&TOPIC_SUBJECT=GREG+BROOKS+IS+DISLIKED+%2D+reply+to+Luca+%28Hangman%29+email
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=407209&TOPIC_SUBJECT=GREG+BROOKS+IS+DSLIKED+%2D+Reply+to+Luca+%28Hangman%29
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=407257&TOPIC_SUBJECT=Someone+pass+me+a+bucket+please+%2D+JOHN+STUART+IS+GROVELLING
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=408508&TOPIC_SUBJECT=YOU+ALL+LOVE+ME+REALLY+%2D+I+KNOW+YOU%27RE+JUST+PLAYING+WITH+ME%21
Zeni posted these links in another topic about Greg's prior history at QZ.
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=404899&TOPIC_SUBJECT=MY+POINT+OF+VIEW%2C+ON+VARIOUS+THINGS
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=406665&TOPIC_SUBJECT=YourValentine
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=407208&TOPIC_SUBJECT=GREG+BROOKS+IS+DISLIKED+%2D+reply+to+Luca+%28Hangman%29+email
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=407209&TOPIC_SUBJECT=GREG+BROOKS+IS+DSLIKED+%2D+Reply+to+Luca+%28Hangman%29
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=407257&TOPIC_SUBJECT=Someone+pass+me+a+bucket+please+%2D+JOHN+STUART+IS+GROVELLING
http://www.queenzone.com/queen/forum/topic_view.asp?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+%2D+Serious+Discussion&Q_FORUM_TOPIC_ID=408508&TOPIC_SUBJECT=YOU+ALL+LOVE+ME+REALLY+%2D+I+KNOW+YOU%27RE+JUST+PLAYING+WITH+ME%21
Ah, I see why I didn't know. I never read posts that are that long. It's too tedious.
Either way, it all seems petty to me... I mean, aren't we better than this?
Either way, it all seems petty to me... I mean, aren't we better than this?
There were plenty of Queenzoners who tried to act as peacemakers, but GB was more interested in the mudwrestling. He ignored JSS's olive branch.
Is Queenzone better than this? Not really. GB has attacked many QZ's over the last two years, I do not think completely ignoring GB's is the answer either. I would not be too concerned about GB, as he thoroughly enjoyed winding things up here, and he is probably still enjoying reading QZ and admiring the havoc he perpetrated.
Is Queenzone better than this? Not really. GB has attacked many QZ's over the last two years, I do not think completely ignoring GB's is the answer either. I would not be too concerned about GB, as he thoroughly enjoyed winding things up here, and he is probably still enjoying reading QZ and admiring the havoc he perpetrated.
His lack of professionalism would be breathtaking but for the quality of his published work, which tends decidely toward the amateurish, as does his behavior. So in that regard, I suppose it all makes sense.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
I'm looking into precisely who Produced each song, rather than just generically who produced each LP.[/QUOTE]
Will you give yourself a co-production credit for every song this time aswell like you did for the freddie mercury boxset?
I'm looking into precisely who Produced each song, rather than just generically who produced each LP.[/QUOTE]
Will you give yourself a co-production credit for every song this time aswell like you did for the freddie mercury boxset?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Rip Van Winkle wrote: [/QUOTENAME]There were plenty of Queenzoners who tried to act as peacemakers, but GB was more interested in the mudwrestling.[/QUOTE]
Does this surprise you? Reminds me of his "Q+A" section on QOL, where he avoided every single decent question and CHOSE to answer dumb questions with sarcastic replies.
He seems to think he is above critism aswell ("how sare you put me down, what have YOU done towards a Queen release!") - which is a bit like saying someone who has never been in a band can't say a certain drummer or guitarist is crap.
Does this surprise you? Reminds me of his "Q+A" section on QOL, where he avoided every single decent question and CHOSE to answer dumb questions with sarcastic replies.
He seems to think he is above critism aswell ("how sare you put me down, what have YOU done towards a Queen release!") - which is a bit like saying someone who has never been in a band can't say a certain drummer or guitarist is crap.
I see the Chad's Hanging again.