Queen crest Queenzone

Wembley versus Live at the Bowl: which is better?

22 posts Page 2 of 2
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
Live At The Bowl, although I prefer Wembley
Live at the Bowl better overall show, altho LAWS has better shots of the crowd, esp. during "Radio Gaga"
When a red hot man meets a white hot lady, Hoop Diddy Diddy, Hoop Diddy Doo!
Budapest, in terms of sound and Freddies voice, is far and away superior to Wembley.

I feel in 1986, though, they were a greatest hits band. In 1982, they were still young and hungry, and it shows in the two performances. Live at the Bowl shows a tight band at the top of their game.
The Golden Gate Bridge should have a long bungee cord for people who aren’t quite ready to commit suicide but want to get in a little practice.
As a preformance I think Wembley is best. Very polished !
http://queen.shanemcdonald.org/ (Shanes Queen Site) Follow me on Twitter Twitter.com/smcdonalddotorg Follow me on Facebook http://www.facebook.com/pages/ShaneMcDonaldorg/118978468128623
Wembley to me was better as far as sound quality and all that technical stuff. But as far as energy, Live at the Bowl rocks!!!
"I WANT TO BREAK FREE"
... hard choice. I suppose ill be more biased as to go for the bowl coz its near where i live but in terms of power and energy id say wembley beats the bowl that way.
i like both in other words!
Nothing matters when knowing nothing matters;; It's just life so keep dancing through;;
The Wembley performance is way better! It's more powerful and funny even :-)