[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]innadizon wrote: [/QUOTENAME]yeah. totally. they're a bunch of pieces of poo. they're tone deaf. no wait, i think they are. in fact, the writers may not be even talking when queen was touring. what date is that mag?[/QUOTE]
It was a book, and the cover was purple if thats any help...which it probably isn't.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
When it comes to Satisfaction (I Cant Get No), I have to say I prefer Devo's version to biglips and friends
Rolling Stone is one of the worst magazines I have ever read. Aside from providing the worst reviews in the worst possible taste in music, they also endlessly spew pseudo-liberal bullshit to appeal to the masses of ignorant teens in the country.
My dad claims it's a great magazine. It's fucking dire. You want a decent rock magazine, read Classic Rock. The brilliant Queen feature they had months ago was what first drew me to it and I've been getting it ever since.
My dad got me a subscription to Rolling Stone for Christmas once...
Because of that, I can now say, "Tyson Ritter wins the 'Your the kind of idiot that made me afraid to read interviews with musicians I DO like' award."
Thank you Rolling Stone - you postponed my introduction to justification that the members of my favourite band are articulate people capable of forming intelligent sentences and being funny.
Because of that, I can now say, "Tyson Ritter wins the 'Your the kind of idiot that made me afraid to read interviews with musicians I DO like' award."
Thank you Rolling Stone - you postponed my introduction to justification that the members of my favourite band are articulate people capable of forming intelligent sentences and being funny.
I agree with you that "Rolling Stone" sucks. What a dumb magazine. You make a good point about Queen Latifa, or whatever her name is. "Rolling Stone" has to be politically correct and pretend like a black woman artist is really great when her songs are so unoriginal. What a joke!