[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Oszmercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Dylan is almost a God, a great poet, imho the greatest songwriter from the past century
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
Awesome to see another Dylan fan here. Yes I agree whole-heartidly. :D
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Oszmercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Dylan is almost a God, a great poet, imho the greatest songwriter from the past century
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here.
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]willem-jan wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Oszmercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Dylan is almost a God, a great poet, imho the greatest songwriter from the past century
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here. [/QUOTE]
that's right ;)
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here. [/QUOTE]
that's right ;)
ok, i'll do it
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]willem-jan wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Oszmercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Dylan is almost a God, a great poet, imho the greatest songwriter from the past century
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here. [/QUOTE]
That's a interesting theory, Although In my opinion Dylan has some great music as well. Blood On The Tracks music is constructed so well..I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here. [/QUOTE]
That's a interesting theory, Although In my opinion Dylan has some great music as well. Blood On The Tracks music is constructed so well..I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SK wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]willem-jan wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Oszmercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Dylan is almost a God, a great poet, imho the greatest songwriter from the past century
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here. [/QUOTE]
That's a interesting theory, Although In my opinion Dylan has some great music as well. Blood On The Tracks music is constructed so well..I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)[/QUOTE]
That's not a musical opinion, and it's far from being a proper analisis.
You're just showing how little you know, but you try to hide it with
"I THINK THAT THIS IS BETTER BECAUSE I LIKE IT"
"IN MY OPINION THIS ISN'T GOOD BECAUSE I CAN'T STAND IT"
Those are the only things I've read till now.
Let's talk about harmony, arrangements, structures, keys. Explain me WHY is Shit Dylan better than Queen, and explain me with real things, not with the shit you've been writting.
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here. [/QUOTE]
That's a interesting theory, Although In my opinion Dylan has some great music as well. Blood On The Tracks music is constructed so well..I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)[/QUOTE]
That's not a musical opinion, and it's far from being a proper analisis.
You're just showing how little you know, but you try to hide it with
"I THINK THAT THIS IS BETTER BECAUSE I LIKE IT"
"IN MY OPINION THIS ISN'T GOOD BECAUSE I CAN'T STAND IT"
Those are the only things I've read till now.
Let's talk about harmony, arrangements, structures, keys. Explain me WHY is Shit Dylan better than Queen, and explain me with real things, not with the shit you've been writting.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]M a t i a s M a y<h6><i>QZ's Rainmaker wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SK wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]willem-jan wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Oszmercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Dylan is almost a God, a great poet, imho the greatest songwriter from the past century
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here. [/QUOTE]
That's a interesting theory, Although In my opinion Dylan has some great music as well. Blood On The Tracks music is constructed so well..I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)[/QUOTE]
That's not a musical opinion, and it's far from being a proper analisis.
You're just showing how little you know, but you try to hide it with
"I THINK THAT THIS IS BETTER BECAUSE I LIKE IT"
"IN MY OPINION THIS ISN'T GOOD BECAUSE I CAN'T STAND IT"
Those are the only things I've read till now.
Let's talk about harmony, arrangements, structures, keys. Explain me WHY is Shit Dylan better than Queen, and explain me with real things, not with the shit you've been writting.[/QUOTE]
lol, oh man, you need to cool down, you're barely making sense mate. First of all, harmony wise, Dylan is able to control his voice and show varied emotions throughout the album. Freddie Mercury is a great singer no doubt, but in ANATO, all the songs he sings are quite poppy, it's a shame because on SHA and QUEEN II, he was just god like.because (Save for Prophet Song,BoRhap and Love Of My Life). Dylan's arrangements on Blood On The Tracks are simply superior, due to their intense use(Induces you emotionally). Queen is great at arrangements, but alas, the album is not structured as good, as "Queen II" or "A Day At The Races", ANATO suffers from the "singles" syndrom. It sounds as if they just threw together whatever they could. Blood On The Tracks was carefully structured. Dylan had no less then 30 songs already in the works. He knew what he was doing, Queen lost touch with the creativity they once had(Queen,Queen II, Sheer Heart Attack) and created an album that appeals to the masses. Dylan created an album taht appeared to intellects, to people who can handle the lyrics and beautiful arrangements. There is no doubt that Queen may seem like a more "proper" band. ANATO is no doubt, enjoyable. But to me, its as enjoyabled as "Tattoo You" by the Rolling Stones, An album that was put together without substance. In my opinion Queen's best and most creativity and mind inducing albums will always be the first three. And if you think this writing is shit, then sir, you do not know what the hell an opinion is. Also, always remember, Queen loved Bob Dylan. And I never said I couldn't stand A Night At The Opera, I just said the instrumentals for songs such as Good Company And IILWMC would not do anything for me, You can have the most complex arrangements in the world, you can overproduce music to bits, but that does not mean it will be great music. It was the simplistic, soulful music of Blood On The Tracks, that made me realize I liked it better in the end. I started this review, with a unbiased look, after carefully listening to both albums. In the end, in my opinion it was quite easy to see that Blood On The Tracks was superior by far. And as someone said in this thread earlier "Sorry Queen fans, that's something you can not change". Now if you would like to deb
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here. [/QUOTE]
That's a interesting theory, Although In my opinion Dylan has some great music as well. Blood On The Tracks music is constructed so well..I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)[/QUOTE]
That's not a musical opinion, and it's far from being a proper analisis.
You're just showing how little you know, but you try to hide it with
"I THINK THAT THIS IS BETTER BECAUSE I LIKE IT"
"IN MY OPINION THIS ISN'T GOOD BECAUSE I CAN'T STAND IT"
Those are the only things I've read till now.
Let's talk about harmony, arrangements, structures, keys. Explain me WHY is Shit Dylan better than Queen, and explain me with real things, not with the shit you've been writting.[/QUOTE]
lol, oh man, you need to cool down, you're barely making sense mate. First of all, harmony wise, Dylan is able to control his voice and show varied emotions throughout the album. Freddie Mercury is a great singer no doubt, but in ANATO, all the songs he sings are quite poppy, it's a shame because on SHA and QUEEN II, he was just god like.because (Save for Prophet Song,BoRhap and Love Of My Life). Dylan's arrangements on Blood On The Tracks are simply superior, due to their intense use(Induces you emotionally). Queen is great at arrangements, but alas, the album is not structured as good, as "Queen II" or "A Day At The Races", ANATO suffers from the "singles" syndrom. It sounds as if they just threw together whatever they could. Blood On The Tracks was carefully structured. Dylan had no less then 30 songs already in the works. He knew what he was doing, Queen lost touch with the creativity they once had(Queen,Queen II, Sheer Heart Attack) and created an album that appeals to the masses. Dylan created an album taht appeared to intellects, to people who can handle the lyrics and beautiful arrangements. There is no doubt that Queen may seem like a more "proper" band. ANATO is no doubt, enjoyable. But to me, its as enjoyabled as "Tattoo You" by the Rolling Stones, An album that was put together without substance. In my opinion Queen's best and most creativity and mind inducing albums will always be the first three. And if you think this writing is shit, then sir, you do not know what the hell an opinion is. Also, always remember, Queen loved Bob Dylan. And I never said I couldn't stand A Night At The Opera, I just said the instrumentals for songs such as Good Company And IILWMC would not do anything for me, You can have the most complex arrangements in the world, you can overproduce music to bits, but that does not mean it will be great music. It was the simplistic, soulful music of Blood On The Tracks, that made me realize I liked it better in the end. I started this review, with a unbiased look, after carefully listening to both albums. In the end, in my opinion it was quite easy to see that Blood On The Tracks was superior by far. And as someone said in this thread earlier "Sorry Queen fans, that's something you can not change". Now if you would like to deb
@SK
What? Not worth listening to an instrumental of Good Company? I think this is one of Queen's best guitar-tracks. Brian did so well on this track, his guitar sounding like a complete orchestra. Nobody else could have done that at that time. Very clever stuff and Brian is for sure flying on this track.
What? Not worth listening to an instrumental of Good Company? I think this is one of Queen's best guitar-tracks. Brian did so well on this track, his guitar sounding like a complete orchestra. Nobody else could have done that at that time. Very clever stuff and Brian is for sure flying on this track.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=blue>Rick wrote: [/QUOTENAME]@SK
What? Not worth listening to an instrumental of Good Company? I think this is one of Queen's best guitar-tracks. Brian did so well on this track, his guitar sounding like a complete orchestra. Nobody else could have done that at that time. Very clever stuff and Brian is for sure flying on this track. [/QUOTE]
Ah yes, I can agree that he is a great guitarist, but the song would lose its mystique without the vocals don't you think? What made that song remotely intresting was the contrast of the voice and instrumental. Take one away, and the other is not nearly as magical. :) If you enjoy the guitar symphony sound, check out Tommy by the Who(the album not the movie or anything) cheers
What? Not worth listening to an instrumental of Good Company? I think this is one of Queen's best guitar-tracks. Brian did so well on this track, his guitar sounding like a complete orchestra. Nobody else could have done that at that time. Very clever stuff and Brian is for sure flying on this track. [/QUOTE]
Ah yes, I can agree that he is a great guitarist, but the song would lose its mystique without the vocals don't you think? What made that song remotely intresting was the contrast of the voice and instrumental. Take one away, and the other is not nearly as magical. :) If you enjoy the guitar symphony sound, check out Tommy by the Who(the album not the movie or anything) cheers
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SK wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]M a t i a s M a y<h6><i>QZ's Rainmaker wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SK wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]willem-jan wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Oszmercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Dylan is almost a God, a great poet, imho the greatest songwriter from the past century
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here. [/QUOTE]
That's a interesting theory, Although In my opinion Dylan has some great music as well. Blood On The Tracks music is constructed so well..I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)[/QUOTE]
That's not a musical opinion, and it's far from being a proper analisis.
You're just showing how little you know, but you try to hide it with
"I THINK THAT THIS IS BETTER BECAUSE I LIKE IT"
"IN MY OPINION THIS ISN'T GOOD BECAUSE I CAN'T STAND IT"
Those are the only things I've read till now.
Let's talk about harmony, arrangements, structures, keys. Explain me WHY is Shit Dylan better than Queen, and explain me with real things, not with the shit you've been writting.[/QUOTE]
lol, oh man, you need to cool down, you're barely making sense mate. First of all, harmony wise, Dylan is able to control his voice and show varied emotions throughout the album. Freddie Mercury is a great singer no doubt, but in ANATO, all the songs he sings are quite poppy, it's a shame because on SHA and QUEEN II, he was just god like.because (Save for Prophet Song,BoRhap and Love Of My Life). Dylan's arrangements on Blood On The Tracks are simply superior, due to their intense use(Induces you emotionally). Queen is great at arrangements, but alas, the album is not structured as good, as "Queen II" or "A Day At The Races", ANATO suffers from the "singles" syndrom. It sounds as if they just threw together whatever they could. Blood On The Tracks was carefully structured. Dylan had no less then 30 songs already in the works. He knew what he was doing, Queen lost touch with the creativity they once had(Queen,Queen II, Sheer Heart Attack) and created an album that appeals to the masses. Dylan created an album taht appeared to intellects, to people who can handle the lyrics and beautiful arrangements. There is no doubt that Queen may seem like a more "proper" band. ANATO is no doubt, enjoyable. But to me, its as enjoyabled as "Tattoo You" by the Rolling Stones, An album that was put together without substance. In my opinion Queen's best and most creativity and mind inducing albums will always be the first three. And if you think this writing is shit, then sir, you do not know what the hell an opinion is. Also, always remember, Queen loved Bob Dylan. And I never said I couldn't stand A Night At The Opera, I just said the instrumentals for songs such as Good Company And IILWMC would not do anything for me, You can have the most complex arrangements in the world, you can overproduce music to bits, but that does not mean it will be great music. It was the simplistic, soulful music of Blood On The Tracks, that made me realize I liked it better in the end. I started this review, with a unbiased look, after carefully listening to both albums. In the end, in my opinion it was quite easy to see that Blood On The Tracks was superior by far. And as someone said in this thread earlier "Sorry Queen fans, that's something you can not ch
sorry Queen fans, you can't change that[/QUOTE]
To me music is about music. If I want to enjoy some good poetry, I'll buy the book. Therefore, I've never been able to enjoy Dylan. And yes, I've tried.
So, for me, it's an easy one. Take away the lyrics from Dylans work, and you don't have that much left.
Do the same for Queen, and you still get some excellent music to enjoy (in my opinion). So, no need to discuss both albums in detail here. [/QUOTE]
That's a interesting theory, Although In my opinion Dylan has some great music as well. Blood On The Tracks music is constructed so well..I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)[/QUOTE]
That's not a musical opinion, and it's far from being a proper analisis.
You're just showing how little you know, but you try to hide it with
"I THINK THAT THIS IS BETTER BECAUSE I LIKE IT"
"IN MY OPINION THIS ISN'T GOOD BECAUSE I CAN'T STAND IT"
Those are the only things I've read till now.
Let's talk about harmony, arrangements, structures, keys. Explain me WHY is Shit Dylan better than Queen, and explain me with real things, not with the shit you've been writting.[/QUOTE]
lol, oh man, you need to cool down, you're barely making sense mate. First of all, harmony wise, Dylan is able to control his voice and show varied emotions throughout the album. Freddie Mercury is a great singer no doubt, but in ANATO, all the songs he sings are quite poppy, it's a shame because on SHA and QUEEN II, he was just god like.because (Save for Prophet Song,BoRhap and Love Of My Life). Dylan's arrangements on Blood On The Tracks are simply superior, due to their intense use(Induces you emotionally). Queen is great at arrangements, but alas, the album is not structured as good, as "Queen II" or "A Day At The Races", ANATO suffers from the "singles" syndrom. It sounds as if they just threw together whatever they could. Blood On The Tracks was carefully structured. Dylan had no less then 30 songs already in the works. He knew what he was doing, Queen lost touch with the creativity they once had(Queen,Queen II, Sheer Heart Attack) and created an album that appeals to the masses. Dylan created an album taht appeared to intellects, to people who can handle the lyrics and beautiful arrangements. There is no doubt that Queen may seem like a more "proper" band. ANATO is no doubt, enjoyable. But to me, its as enjoyabled as "Tattoo You" by the Rolling Stones, An album that was put together without substance. In my opinion Queen's best and most creativity and mind inducing albums will always be the first three. And if you think this writing is shit, then sir, you do not know what the hell an opinion is. Also, always remember, Queen loved Bob Dylan. And I never said I couldn't stand A Night At The Opera, I just said the instrumentals for songs such as Good Company And IILWMC would not do anything for me, You can have the most complex arrangements in the world, you can overproduce music to bits, but that does not mean it will be great music. It was the simplistic, soulful music of Blood On The Tracks, that made me realize I liked it better in the end. I started this review, with a unbiased look, after carefully listening to both albums. In the end, in my opinion it was quite easy to see that Blood On The Tracks was superior by far. And as someone said in this thread earlier "Sorry Queen fans, that's something you can not ch
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SK wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)[/QUOTE]
Until now I've welcomed your views in this topic, but if you can rate a Bob Dylan album as being musically superior to ANATO, including the track Good Company, part of which is rock music's one and only note for note arrangement of a jazz big band of electric guitars, then you really don't know what you're talking about. Bob Dylan can keep strumming his G and D chords, and Brian May will go down in history as being the master of guitar orchestration.
Until now I've welcomed your views in this topic, but if you can rate a Bob Dylan album as being musically superior to ANATO, including the track Good Company, part of which is rock music's one and only note for note arrangement of a jazz big band of electric guitars, then you really don't know what you're talking about. Bob Dylan can keep strumming his G and D chords, and Brian May will go down in history as being the master of guitar orchestration.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SK wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)[/QUOTE]
Until now I've welcomed your views in this topic, but if you can rate a Bob Dylan album as being musically superior to ANATO, including the track Good Company, part of which is rock music's one and only note for note arrangement of a jazz big band of electric guitars, then you really don't know what you're talking about. Bob Dylan can keep strumming his G and D chords, and Brian May will go down in history as being the master of guitar orchestration.
[/QUOTE]
Never ment to say it was musically superior, just more enjoyable to me. I enjoy the instrumentals of Blood On The Tracks. It sounds amazing and such. It's quite beautiful really.
@Matias, you have no opinion on this matter till you've listen to both albums. So keep on barking. And yes, I do know about harmony, if you really want a real sense of harmony, I suggest you go out and buy Pet Sounds. then again, I wouldn't exspect someone like yourself to enjoy such an album. Cheers.
Until now I've welcomed your views in this topic, but if you can rate a Bob Dylan album as being musically superior to ANATO, including the track Good Company, part of which is rock music's one and only note for note arrangement of a jazz big band of electric guitars, then you really don't know what you're talking about. Bob Dylan can keep strumming his G and D chords, and Brian May will go down in history as being the master of guitar orchestration.
[/QUOTE]
Never ment to say it was musically superior, just more enjoyable to me. I enjoy the instrumentals of Blood On The Tracks. It sounds amazing and such. It's quite beautiful really.
@Matias, you have no opinion on this matter till you've listen to both albums. So keep on barking. And yes, I do know about harmony, if you really want a real sense of harmony, I suggest you go out and buy Pet Sounds. then again, I wouldn't exspect someone like yourself to enjoy such an album. Cheers.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SK wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Never ment to say it was musically superior, just more enjoyable to me. I enjoy the instrumentals of Blood On The Tracks. It sounds amazing and such. It's quite beautiful really.[/QUOTE]
Right on. We disagree, but that's alright. Cheers.
Right on. We disagree, but that's alright. Cheers.
Kinda makes no sense to ask for unbiased opinions on a Queen fansite.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SK wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SK wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I could honestly listen to a whole instrumental of it..I can't say the same for ANATO, Listening to a Instrumental of "I'm In Love With My Car" or "Good Company" no thank you :)[/QUOTE]
Until now I've welcomed your views in this topic, but if you can rate a Bob Dylan album as being musically superior to ANATO, including the track Good Company, part of which is rock music's one and only note for note arrangement of a jazz big band of electric guitars, then you really don't know what you're talking about. Bob Dylan can keep strumming his G and D chords, and Brian May will go down in history as being the master of guitar orchestration.
[/QUOTE]
Never ment to say it was musically superior, just more enjoyable to me. I enjoy the instrumentals of Blood On The Tracks. It sounds amazing and such. It's quite beautiful really.
@Matias, you have no opinion on this matter till you've listen to both albums. So keep on barking. And yes, I do know about harmony, if you really want a real sense of harmony, I suggest you go out and buy Pet Sounds. then again, I wouldn't exspect someone like yourself to enjoy such an album. Cheers.[/QUOTE]
blah blah blah
You say you know, but you never show how much you know... actually, you don't even show that you know.
And it seems you don't even know what harmony is.
Poor guy
Until now I've welcomed your views in this topic, but if you can rate a Bob Dylan album as being musically superior to ANATO, including the track Good Company, part of which is rock music's one and only note for note arrangement of a jazz big band of electric guitars, then you really don't know what you're talking about. Bob Dylan can keep strumming his G and D chords, and Brian May will go down in history as being the master of guitar orchestration.
[/QUOTE]
Never ment to say it was musically superior, just more enjoyable to me. I enjoy the instrumentals of Blood On The Tracks. It sounds amazing and such. It's quite beautiful really.
@Matias, you have no opinion on this matter till you've listen to both albums. So keep on barking. And yes, I do know about harmony, if you really want a real sense of harmony, I suggest you go out and buy Pet Sounds. then again, I wouldn't exspect someone like yourself to enjoy such an album. Cheers.[/QUOTE]
blah blah blah
You say you know, but you never show how much you know... actually, you don't even show that you know.
And it seems you don't even know what harmony is.
Poor guy