I am waiting for your apology to Richard and myself.
k-m · Member since
Well, I don't know about the posts being deleted but recently there was a thread "Who HATES Paul Rodgers?". It was changed to "Who DISLIKES Paul Rodgers?". Political correctness on a Queen forum? WTF!??
YourValentine · Member since
k-m - most likely the author of that thread edited the subject, why don't you ask him/her?
Raf · Member since
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]YourValentine wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I am waiting for your apology to Richard and myself.[/QUOTE]
That's gonna be fun. Greg, where are you now? XD
QUEENROCKS_1991 · Member since
Erm.... QA would you like some wd40 spray or maybe a new keyboard your CAP button seem to be stuck ? lol
Queen Archivist · Member since
Yes please QUEENROCKS, can you you send me a tin please.
How kind of you.
Raf · Member since
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Yes please QUEENROCKS, can you you send me a tin please.
How kind of you. [/QUOTE]
Hey, you owe the QZ team an apology.
It was very easy for you to attack them when you thought you were wrong - now why don't you fix it, as it's been proved YOU're wrong and THEY're right?
Wilki Amieva · Member since
Hmmm. So all this fuss ended (and started) in a Greg Brooks mistake. Maybe Queen Productions should sell re-prints of this thread? ...After all, is the kind of product we are used to. ;-)
Unknown
Greg,
I'm sorry that something has happened to make you think that two of your threads got deleted. However, you should've contacted the management of QZ in private before you made accusations (whether or not you were correct). I'm sorry that this occured. Next time, please keep the rest of QZ out of this, as I'm only trying to be polite by responding. The way you phrased it, it sounded like something completely different. Once again, everyone is sorry for this and hope that we can all move on.
Wilki Amieva · Member since
Those threads were NOT deleted.
Unknown
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Wilki Amieva wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Those threads were NOT deleted.[/QUOTE]
I just read those threads and Greg, you knew they were going to be moved. Thank you, Wilki!
Rick · Member since
The most funny thing about this is, Greggieboy, is that you built up this reputation YOURSELF.
What do you expect from us? Kissing your hairy butt? Sorry dude, no can do. I'm not gay.
Go headbutt a train or something.
You're further below then our sealevel here in The Netherlands.
Paul is much more human and 'NORMAL' than ok.computer.
**I'm glad you think so. "Paul" was already taken. Ok Computer was on my desk at the time. It seemed handy. Strangely though, I doubt "Greg Brooks" was taken as a handle. Hmm.***
You over estimate my influence on Queen product.
**I really don't. Not after the number of errors in your work that have been pointed out by other members of this forum. But I do feel you could be using your time and position a little more constructively than you seem to with rapid-fire (or should that be vapid...?) postings in here.***
For example, Justin Shirley-Smith, Richard Gray, Josh M, Kris F, Simon L, and I all worked on Queen Singles. We all do our respective bits, thinking it's gonna emerge for such and such a date. Then the band members tell us, and EMI, not the other way around, when THEY want the product to emerge. This can differ to what we think, and it usually does. RT, BM and JD are not short of experience on how this industry works.
***Then you should be able to list, unequivocally, what "bits" have been done, what product remains to be released, etc etc. To be able to say "I have worked on X number of concerts for DVD release purpose....we have completed master tapes for X number of CD releases which may contain Y and Z as material" is not going to be breaking any trade secrets, now, is it...?***
Queen is THEIR band, not ours, not EMI's. Queen is RT, JD, BM. Anyone who thinks that an Archivist has any say over precisely what gets issued and when, is living in a dream world.
***Again, I put it to you that there should be no issue in discussing in clear terms (and with no infusion of the usual malice and vitriol which seems to pervade your posts), just what will be available when the Queen machine decides. You don't expect us to believe "oh, Roger and Brian don't want anyone to know what's available in case its not a surprise and everyone gets very disappointed".***
***Just what DOES your job description entail, Sir? I put it to you, that if you ARE Greg Brooks, you will have no trouble in imparting what you're up to. If you AREN'T Greg Brooks, then I have wasted about 4 minutes replying to a bogus post...but no matter. It is only marginally more fun than trimming my nails. And that only takes about 4 minutes too.***
I only put stuff in the proposal. We only offer up the ingredients. It is the band who discard or keep stuff.
***I put it to you again. What is your role? What are you actually doing under a contract with Queen? Why do we see very little emerging after...what...six years of waiting?***
You guys should direct your pops at the upper part of the ladder, not at those of us who are not in the Queen band.
Picture the scene: Band meetings with band Manager.
THEY make the decisions. NO ONE else.
***I fear that your endless malicious little pops that deliver very little in the way of information for fans pretty much sums up your attitude, both to the error-littered work you produce, and to the people that ultimately provide Queen with the finance that keeps you in employment.***
[/QUOTE]
k-m · Member since
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]YourValentine wrote: [/QUOTENAME]k-m - most likely the author of that thread edited the subject, why don't you ask him/her?
[/QUOTE]
Sorry, I didn't know you can edit threads by yourself
