Who is Charles Baer? My name is Charles, but not Baer. lol
Thread
Posts in chronological order
let's get it ON , ah yeah
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=?B2F><b>Crezchi wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Greg, if you want to be taken seriously here EVER, lose the 'Queen Archivist' name and post under something else. I could care less if you are the 'Archivist' or not. You shouldn't come here and expect us to give you respect on a silver platter, you have to earn respect like all of us. I know there are alot of QZ's that are just impossible, but get over them, they are not worth it. Until you can offer this site some useful resources or imformation, and i am not asking for media, just information, then leave! Or drop the Queen Archivist shit and be a normal fan. I have a respectful and serious question for you... Why exactly are you here? And please do not ramble on about something else when you answer, be straight to the point, we deserve that much. [/QUOTE]
That is true! Since I am following this forum, Mr. Brooks is only starting stupid discussions with people he does not like for one reason or the other.
One time he was asking for rare film material from the fans. Even then he started to get inpolite and rude. The only reason why I keep my filmed footage is his behaviour. I think that it is his fault that serious collectors prefer to keep their rarest and most interesting pieces. And all because he has no manners and treats people in here like idiots.
That is true! Since I am following this forum, Mr. Brooks is only starting stupid discussions with people he does not like for one reason or the other.
One time he was asking for rare film material from the fans. Even then he started to get inpolite and rude. The only reason why I keep my filmed footage is his behaviour. I think that it is his fault that serious collectors prefer to keep their rarest and most interesting pieces. And all because he has no manners and treats people in here like idiots.
I didn't care when Brian May was being 'impersonated' and I sure as hell don't care if someone may or may not be posting like GB; or in fact be, GB pretending to be someone else.
Bigger. Fish. To. Fry. Why is this thread even here?!
Bigger. Fish. To. Fry. Why is this thread even here?!
Is this a serious discussion?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sebastian wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Is this a serious discussion? [/QUOTE]
And is it even about Queen?
And is it even about Queen?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]magicalfreddiemercury wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sebastian wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Is this a serious discussion? [/QUOTE]
And is it even about Queen?[/QUOTE]
No, it's not. *edit*
Cheers,
Ogre-
And is it even about Queen?[/QUOTE]
No, it's not. *edit*
Cheers,
Ogre-
To Max-fast who wrote...
One time he was asking for rare film material from the fans. Even then he started to get inpolite and rude.
YES. TRUE. BECAUSE I ENCOUNTERED SOME REAL IMBECILES. EVEN SOME QZ PEOPLE AGREED THAT MANY STUPID PEOPLE WITH STUPID COMMENTS HAD REPLIED TO THAT REQUEST PURELY TO GET THEMSELVES ATTENTION, AND NO OTHER REASON. THERE ARE LOTS OF THEM ON THIS SITE MAX.
The only reason why I keep my filmed footage is his behaviour.
THEN YOU ARE STUPID TOO. WHAT A RIDICULOUS REASON TO HOLD BACK... BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE GREG BROOKS' ATTITUDE. THIS IS ILLOGICAL AND CHILDISH, AND PRECISELY THE KIND OF COMMENT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
THIS HAS NO SENSE TO IT, MAX. YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU WILL NOT BE SHARING ANY PRECIOUS QUEEN GEMS YOU 'MIGHT' HAVE, WITH THE WIDER QUEEN COMMUNITY, BECAUSE OF ONE PERSON.... ME, AND IT IS TOTALLY FLAWED THINKING. YOU MAKE YOURSELF LOOK LIKE A TWAT WITH SUCH ILL THOUGHT OUT COMMENTS. YOURS ARE THE THOUGHTS OF A YOUNG MAN (OR WOMAN) I THINK.
I think that it is his fault that serious collectors prefer to keep their rarest and most interesting pieces. And all because he has no manners and treats people in here like idiots.
IF YOU AND OTHERS HOLD BACK GREAT STUFF BECAUSE OF ME, MORE FOOL YOU.
I THINK THESE ARE THE THOUGHTS AND FLAWED LOGIC OF A PERSON WHO IS NOT THINKING ABOUT OR SEEING THE WIDER MORE IMPORTANT PICTURE. MY GUESS IS THAT YOU ARE IN YOUR LATE TEEN OR EARLY 20'S, AND THUS ARE UNLIKELY TO HAVE GENUINE QUEEN RARITIES THAT WE DO NOT ALREADY HAVE.
I FURTHER THINK YOU ARE SAYING THIS PURELY IN ORDER TO MAKE YOUR POINT, BUT NOT REALISING YOUR POINT IS LUDICROUS IN THE FIRST PLACE. IT FALLS AT THE VERY FIRST HURDLE.
IF ANYONE HAS GEMS RELATING TO QUEEN, THEN WHY WOULD THEY LET AN ARCHIVIST PERSON GET UP THEIR NOSE TO SUCH AN EXTENT? WHY WOULD ANYONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND TAKE SUCH A PATHETIC STANCE? YOU SHOULD RE-THINK YOUR SILLY POINT MAXIMUS.
One time he was asking for rare film material from the fans. Even then he started to get inpolite and rude.
YES. TRUE. BECAUSE I ENCOUNTERED SOME REAL IMBECILES. EVEN SOME QZ PEOPLE AGREED THAT MANY STUPID PEOPLE WITH STUPID COMMENTS HAD REPLIED TO THAT REQUEST PURELY TO GET THEMSELVES ATTENTION, AND NO OTHER REASON. THERE ARE LOTS OF THEM ON THIS SITE MAX.
The only reason why I keep my filmed footage is his behaviour.
THEN YOU ARE STUPID TOO. WHAT A RIDICULOUS REASON TO HOLD BACK... BECAUSE YOU DON'T LIKE GREG BROOKS' ATTITUDE. THIS IS ILLOGICAL AND CHILDISH, AND PRECISELY THE KIND OF COMMENT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
THIS HAS NO SENSE TO IT, MAX. YOU ARE SAYING THAT YOU WILL NOT BE SHARING ANY PRECIOUS QUEEN GEMS YOU 'MIGHT' HAVE, WITH THE WIDER QUEEN COMMUNITY, BECAUSE OF ONE PERSON.... ME, AND IT IS TOTALLY FLAWED THINKING. YOU MAKE YOURSELF LOOK LIKE A TWAT WITH SUCH ILL THOUGHT OUT COMMENTS. YOURS ARE THE THOUGHTS OF A YOUNG MAN (OR WOMAN) I THINK.
I think that it is his fault that serious collectors prefer to keep their rarest and most interesting pieces. And all because he has no manners and treats people in here like idiots.
IF YOU AND OTHERS HOLD BACK GREAT STUFF BECAUSE OF ME, MORE FOOL YOU.
I THINK THESE ARE THE THOUGHTS AND FLAWED LOGIC OF A PERSON WHO IS NOT THINKING ABOUT OR SEEING THE WIDER MORE IMPORTANT PICTURE. MY GUESS IS THAT YOU ARE IN YOUR LATE TEEN OR EARLY 20'S, AND THUS ARE UNLIKELY TO HAVE GENUINE QUEEN RARITIES THAT WE DO NOT ALREADY HAVE.
I FURTHER THINK YOU ARE SAYING THIS PURELY IN ORDER TO MAKE YOUR POINT, BUT NOT REALISING YOUR POINT IS LUDICROUS IN THE FIRST PLACE. IT FALLS AT THE VERY FIRST HURDLE.
IF ANYONE HAS GEMS RELATING TO QUEEN, THEN WHY WOULD THEY LET AN ARCHIVIST PERSON GET UP THEIR NOSE TO SUCH AN EXTENT? WHY WOULD ANYONE IN THEIR RIGHT MIND TAKE SUCH A PATHETIC STANCE? YOU SHOULD RE-THINK YOUR SILLY POINT MAXIMUS.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]THIS IS ILLOGICAL AND CHILDISH, AND PRECISELY THE KIND OF COMMENT I'M TALKING ABOUT.
[/QUOTE]
Hmmm, like all of the crap you post here. If you were to HELP Queen fans and not just bug them, you'd probably get much more respect. Just a thought.
[/QUOTE]
Hmmm, like all of the crap you post here. If you were to HELP Queen fans and not just bug them, you'd probably get much more respect. Just a thought.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Nope. Not John. The person I mean has a wicked sense of humour and is witty and sharp - not remotely dull and insecure.[/QUOTE]
and you say you don't provoke anger?
and you say you don't provoke anger?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sebastian wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Is this a serious discussion?[/QUOTE]
well it's not funny, so it must by default be serious
well it's not funny, so it must by default be serious
SMITTY... How many more times do I have to say this...
I don't care about getting respect here on QZ, or commandinng respect, you guys respecting me more, or less, or at all. QZ-ers losing respect for me is something that does not enter my thinking until someone mentions I don't get much of it. they say it as if I would care about it.
YOU are pre-occupied with respect. I am NOT. I care about the respect of Roger and Brian and Jim Beach and Justin and Kris and Sarah and Pete, etc, because they know me vastly better than anyone here ever will. They see the work I do and things I find and uncover, and the numerous things we as a great team participate in (most of which never sees the light of day). There is a huge amount of genuine mutual respect between us - there has to be. It is natural and normal and a very nice thing.
To be trusted by the people you respect most in this world, enough to be left in their home, alone, logging memorabilia, is the hugest compliment I can imagine. It shows a trust and respect element that cannot be paralled here on QZ. Do you see what I mean?
You know yourself Smitty, I'm sure... we all care about respect, but only in certain circles. Yes?
If the dickhead who lives oposite your house is a moron, and his kids are horrible too, do YOU care whether they respect you or not? Do you care a jot if your newsagent, who irritates you, respects you or not? Or if the bloke that punches you in the face on the football pitch, respects you? Of course you don't.
Do you care if your work colleagues, family, friends, wife, girlfriend, kids, respect you???? Of course you do. Tht matters enormously.
Does Smitty or YV or John Stuart give a damn if Greg Brooks respects them? NO. Do i need or crave your respect, or that of the QZ community? I do not. Why would I?
Why do so many of you genuinely believe that I am troubled by that aspect?
It is mentioned on QZ probably more than any other point...
Greg would get more respect if THIS if THAT.
Smitty, the person you dislike most in your place of work, or at your local pub, would RESPECT you much more if you would only do this, or that, or if you would do what HE thinks you should be doing. DO YOU CARE???? You do not.
I'm not trying to be a smart arse. I'm just saying that respect only matters if you have it from the people in your world that truly matter.
I don't care about getting respect here on QZ, or commandinng respect, you guys respecting me more, or less, or at all. QZ-ers losing respect for me is something that does not enter my thinking until someone mentions I don't get much of it. they say it as if I would care about it.
YOU are pre-occupied with respect. I am NOT. I care about the respect of Roger and Brian and Jim Beach and Justin and Kris and Sarah and Pete, etc, because they know me vastly better than anyone here ever will. They see the work I do and things I find and uncover, and the numerous things we as a great team participate in (most of which never sees the light of day). There is a huge amount of genuine mutual respect between us - there has to be. It is natural and normal and a very nice thing.
To be trusted by the people you respect most in this world, enough to be left in their home, alone, logging memorabilia, is the hugest compliment I can imagine. It shows a trust and respect element that cannot be paralled here on QZ. Do you see what I mean?
You know yourself Smitty, I'm sure... we all care about respect, but only in certain circles. Yes?
If the dickhead who lives oposite your house is a moron, and his kids are horrible too, do YOU care whether they respect you or not? Do you care a jot if your newsagent, who irritates you, respects you or not? Or if the bloke that punches you in the face on the football pitch, respects you? Of course you don't.
Do you care if your work colleagues, family, friends, wife, girlfriend, kids, respect you???? Of course you do. Tht matters enormously.
Does Smitty or YV or John Stuart give a damn if Greg Brooks respects them? NO. Do i need or crave your respect, or that of the QZ community? I do not. Why would I?
Why do so many of you genuinely believe that I am troubled by that aspect?
It is mentioned on QZ probably more than any other point...
Greg would get more respect if THIS if THAT.
Smitty, the person you dislike most in your place of work, or at your local pub, would RESPECT you much more if you would only do this, or that, or if you would do what HE thinks you should be doing. DO YOU CARE???? You do not.
I'm not trying to be a smart arse. I'm just saying that respect only matters if you have it from the people in your world that truly matter.
Dear Brenski...
Queen Archivist wrote:
Nope. Not John. The person I mean has a wicked sense of humour and is witty and sharp - not remotely dull and insecure.
*********
and you say you don't provoke anger?
NO BRENSKI. I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT. I SAY THE EXACT OPPOSITE IN FACT... AND MANY TIMES.
I DO SOMETIMES PROVOKE ANGER, AMONG OTHER THINGS, BECAUSE THOUGH I TAKE INSULTS ON THE CHIN, AND DON'T GET UPSET ABOUT IT, WHEN I GIVE SOME OF IT BACK OUT... WHEN I WIND UP QZ-ERS LIKE THEY TRY TO WIND ME UP, SOME OF THEM GET EXTREMELY, HUGELY, MASSIVELY UPSET AND ANGRY.
YOU KNOW THAT OLD ADDAGE... THEY CAN GIVE IT OUT, BUT NOT TAKE IT BACK. YOU HAVE TO PITY THEM... OR TAKE THE MICKEY FUTHER, IF THAT'S ALL THEY RESPOND TO.
YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN, AND YOU MUST KNOW IT'S TRUE TOO.
I ENSURE IT'S NOT ONE WAY TRAFFIC. INSULTS AND WIND-UPS AND ANGER AND SUCH LIKE, IS A TWO WAY STREET.
Queen Archivist wrote:
Nope. Not John. The person I mean has a wicked sense of humour and is witty and sharp - not remotely dull and insecure.
*********
and you say you don't provoke anger?
NO BRENSKI. I HAVE NEVER SAID THAT. I SAY THE EXACT OPPOSITE IN FACT... AND MANY TIMES.
I DO SOMETIMES PROVOKE ANGER, AMONG OTHER THINGS, BECAUSE THOUGH I TAKE INSULTS ON THE CHIN, AND DON'T GET UPSET ABOUT IT, WHEN I GIVE SOME OF IT BACK OUT... WHEN I WIND UP QZ-ERS LIKE THEY TRY TO WIND ME UP, SOME OF THEM GET EXTREMELY, HUGELY, MASSIVELY UPSET AND ANGRY.
YOU KNOW THAT OLD ADDAGE... THEY CAN GIVE IT OUT, BUT NOT TAKE IT BACK. YOU HAVE TO PITY THEM... OR TAKE THE MICKEY FUTHER, IF THAT'S ALL THEY RESPOND TO.
YOU KNOW WHAT I MEAN, AND YOU MUST KNOW IT'S TRUE TOO.
I ENSURE IT'S NOT ONE WAY TRAFFIC. INSULTS AND WIND-UPS AND ANGER AND SUCH LIKE, IS A TWO WAY STREET.
Why are you shouting ? to QA I have been reading all this people have right to say what they want to say fine but why the cap on ?
Dear Mr. Brooks,
I am keeping my material for copyright reasons first of all. It is from television and it is uncut raw material. I suppose the TV station does not have any of that anymore. And if I would not have had connections at that time, I would not have this material too. So it is only half legal.
Actually when you asked for some film footage I thought about contacting you, but when I saw how you treat people in here, I changed my mind quickly. And I think many collectors here have the same feelings about this. So there is nothing childish about this.
And why should I care about the others? If they can see this footage or not? You don't care about anyone in here. So don't ask me to care about anyone!!
I am keeping my material for copyright reasons first of all. It is from television and it is uncut raw material. I suppose the TV station does not have any of that anymore. And if I would not have had connections at that time, I would not have this material too. So it is only half legal.
Actually when you asked for some film footage I thought about contacting you, but when I saw how you treat people in here, I changed my mind quickly. And I think many collectors here have the same feelings about this. So there is nothing childish about this.
And why should I care about the others? If they can see this footage or not? You don't care about anyone in here. So don't ask me to care about anyone!!