Sounds like gumph then!
Just seems to be someone looking for a little fame, don't you think? 2:47?
Why the heck were people so excited about it. ESPECIALLY the topic starter which I'm extremely surprised at because he has claimed not to like fan mixes. Well, I suppose he didn't really know it was one. Fair enough.
But still, a "remake"?? Someone led him on.
Adam.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Adam,
First: Why do you feel the need to address me as the ‘…the topic starter', and that you need view my information with ‘scepticism’? I guess that you may not like me, but, you can still call me by my first name.
Second: Have I ever deliberately misled anyone in Queenzone?
No – I do not think so.
So why call into doubt what I have written by saying that this information was ‘sceptical’?
As one observant QZ reader noted, from 10 unknowable/unverifiable pieces of information which I wrote about in 1996 – he has personally witnessed 8 of my ‘accounts’ accurately come to pass. Now while you (or he) still retain the right to doubt the final two which are still by public account unverifiable, at least he had the grace to judge me on past track record – because he, so far, has had no reason to doubt me.
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+-+Serious+Discussion&TOPIC_SUBJECT=Bohemian+Rhapsody+-+Original+1975+promo+video+out-takes&Q=909042&page=2
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]MikloS wrote: [/QUOTENAME]So far i have not seen any evidence of John Stuart lying intentionally to any of us about Queen facts or tapes/recordings that does / does not exist (note: I talk about facts, not his relationship with Greg or QP or anybody else, just simply facts and trivia and information regarding Pre-Queen/Queen recordings). His research about pre-Queen activity (i am referring to Record Collector articles in 95-96) was excellent at that time. Ibex/Green/Reaction/Opposition/1984 were recordings he wrote/spoke about earlier than anybody else, and most of these are already out and downloadable, all fans can enjoy them. We havent seen evidence of the Hangman acetate or the Hectics recordings, that means possibly 2 out of 10 ultra rare recordings are not confirmed, but unconfirmed recordings does NOT prove that he is lying about those.
[/QUOTE]
Third: What I actually wrote above was: ‘A new 2006 version of 'Self Made Man' by Queen has been blasting its way through Belfast night clubs for the last two months… It was played on BBC Radio (with the permission of the band) a few weeks ago but this seems to have passed largely un-noticed on the Queen fan radar. I have been scouring e-bay for some sort of promotional version, but as yet, the track seems confined to sampled DJ sets’.
Can I point out that this third point is STILL indeed accurate and that this 'release' sounds more than just another lame Queenzone fan mix – or can you point me in the direction of any other Queenzone mixer who have been showered with such an honour?
And while the above may ‘appear’ to be a disservice of the work of some of the remixers in here, can I point out that I consider other ‘official’ mixes such as the ‘Stone Cold Crazy' – trash mix or any of the legitimate (though dreadful) Rick Rubin ‘We Will Rock You’ remixes, still fair game to add to MY Queen collection.
I also thought that the Robertson ‘Beautiful Day Instrumental Version’ (which was later officially released by Queen as a download at Queenonline), and the sublime ‘New York At Last’ remixes were also worthy of a physical release.
However, I do not manufacture product, I only catalogue and collect, and as this latest ‘Self Made Man’ is bubbling in the Belfast underground scene, what I really wanted to know was - if a physical version exists. If it does not, that does not negate the fact that it has been causing quite a bit of excitement over in Northern Ireland.
Otherwise, I have no complaint with your mail, but I do think that you could be a little more gracious.
Besides, 'Sounds like gumph then'! - really sounds like sour grapes if you have not heard the track in question.
First: Why do you feel the need to address me as the ‘…the topic starter', and that you need view my information with ‘scepticism’? I guess that you may not like me, but, you can still call me by my first name.
Second: Have I ever deliberately misled anyone in Queenzone?
No – I do not think so.
So why call into doubt what I have written by saying that this information was ‘sceptical’?
As one observant QZ reader noted, from 10 unknowable/unverifiable pieces of information which I wrote about in 1996 – he has personally witnessed 8 of my ‘accounts’ accurately come to pass. Now while you (or he) still retain the right to doubt the final two which are still by public account unverifiable, at least he had the grace to judge me on past track record – because he, so far, has had no reason to doubt me.
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+-+Serious+Discussion&TOPIC_SUBJECT=Bohemian+Rhapsody+-+Original+1975+promo+video+out-takes&Q=909042&page=2
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]MikloS wrote: [/QUOTENAME]So far i have not seen any evidence of John Stuart lying intentionally to any of us about Queen facts or tapes/recordings that does / does not exist (note: I talk about facts, not his relationship with Greg or QP or anybody else, just simply facts and trivia and information regarding Pre-Queen/Queen recordings). His research about pre-Queen activity (i am referring to Record Collector articles in 95-96) was excellent at that time. Ibex/Green/Reaction/Opposition/1984 were recordings he wrote/spoke about earlier than anybody else, and most of these are already out and downloadable, all fans can enjoy them. We havent seen evidence of the Hangman acetate or the Hectics recordings, that means possibly 2 out of 10 ultra rare recordings are not confirmed, but unconfirmed recordings does NOT prove that he is lying about those.
[/QUOTE]
Third: What I actually wrote above was: ‘A new 2006 version of 'Self Made Man' by Queen has been blasting its way through Belfast night clubs for the last two months… It was played on BBC Radio (with the permission of the band) a few weeks ago but this seems to have passed largely un-noticed on the Queen fan radar. I have been scouring e-bay for some sort of promotional version, but as yet, the track seems confined to sampled DJ sets’.
Can I point out that this third point is STILL indeed accurate and that this 'release' sounds more than just another lame Queenzone fan mix – or can you point me in the direction of any other Queenzone mixer who have been showered with such an honour?
And while the above may ‘appear’ to be a disservice of the work of some of the remixers in here, can I point out that I consider other ‘official’ mixes such as the ‘Stone Cold Crazy' – trash mix or any of the legitimate (though dreadful) Rick Rubin ‘We Will Rock You’ remixes, still fair game to add to MY Queen collection.
I also thought that the Robertson ‘Beautiful Day Instrumental Version’ (which was later officially released by Queen as a download at Queenonline), and the sublime ‘New York At Last’ remixes were also worthy of a physical release.
However, I do not manufacture product, I only catalogue and collect, and as this latest ‘Self Made Man’ is bubbling in the Belfast underground scene, what I really wanted to know was - if a physical version exists. If it does not, that does not negate the fact that it has been causing quite a bit of excitement over in Northern Ireland.
Otherwise, I have no complaint with your mail, but I do think that you could be a little more gracious.
Besides, 'Sounds like gumph then'! - really sounds like sour grapes if you have not heard the track in question.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]John S Stuart wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Adam,
First: Why do you feel the need to address me as the ‘…the topic starter', and that you need view my information with ‘scepticism’? I guess that you may not like me, but, you can still call me by my first name.
Second: Have I ever deliberately misled anyone in Queenzone?
No – I do not think so.
So why call into doubt what I have written by saying that this information was ‘sceptical’?
As one observant QZ reader noted, from 10 unknowable/unverifiable pieces of information which I wrote about in 1996 – he has personally witnessed 8 of my ‘accounts’ accurately come to pass. Now while you (or he) still retain the right to doubt the final two which are still by public account unverifiable, at least he had the grace to judge me on past track record – because he, so far, has had no reason to doubt me.
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+-+Serious+Discussion&TOPIC_SUBJECT=Bohemian+Rhapsody+-+Original+1975+promo+video+out-takes&Q=909042&page=2
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]MikloS wrote: [/QUOTENAME]So far i have not seen any evidence of John Stuart lying intentionally to any of us about Queen facts or tapes/recordings that does / does not exist (note: I talk about facts, not his relationship with Greg or QP or anybody else, just simply facts and trivia and information regarding Pre-Queen/Queen recordings). His research about pre-Queen activity (i am referring to Record Collector articles in 95-96) was excellent at that time. Ibex/Green/Reaction/Opposition/1984 were recordings he wrote/spoke about earlier than anybody else, and most of these are already out and downloadable, all fans can enjoy them. We havent seen evidence of the Hangman acetate or the Hectics recordings, that means possibly 2 out of 10 ultra rare recordings are not confirmed, but unconfirmed recordings does NOT prove that he is lying about those.
[/QUOTE]
Third: What I actually wrote above was: ‘A new 2006 version of 'Self Made Man' by Queen has been blasting its way through Belfast night clubs for the last two months… It was played on BBC Radio (with the permission of the band) a few weeks ago but this seems to have passed largely un-noticed on the Queen fan radar. I have been scouring e-bay for some sort of promotional version, but as yet, the track seems confined to sampled DJ sets’.
Can I point out that this third point is STILL indeed accurate and that this 'release' sounds more than just another lame Queenzone fan mix – or can you point me in the direction of any other Queenzone mixer who have been showered with such an honour?
And while the above may ‘appear’ to be a disservice of the work of some of the remixers in here, can I point out that I consider other ‘official’ mixes such as the ‘Stone Cold Crazy' – trash mix or any of the legitimate (though dreadful) Rick Rubin ‘We Will Rock You’ remixes, still fair game to add to MY Queen collection.
I also thought that the Robertson ‘Beautiful Day Instrumental Version’ (which was later officially released by Queen as a download at Queenonline), and the sublime ‘New York At Last’ remixes were also worthy of a physical release.
However, I do not manufacture product, I only catalogue and collect, and as this latest ‘Self Made Man’ is bubbling in the Belfast underground scene, what I really wanted to know was - if a physical version exists. If it does not, that does not negate the fact that it has been causing quite a bit of excitement over in Northern Ireland.
Otherwise, I have no complaint with your mail, but I do think that you could be a little more gracious.
Besides, 'Sounds like gumph then'! - really sounds like sour grapes if you have not heard the track in question.
[/QUOTE]
You ARE the topic starter! Why should I have to use a person's screen name? I felt the topic was more important.
And the scepticism is not at YOUR information. I actually re
First: Why do you feel the need to address me as the ‘…the topic starter', and that you need view my information with ‘scepticism’? I guess that you may not like me, but, you can still call me by my first name.
Second: Have I ever deliberately misled anyone in Queenzone?
No – I do not think so.
So why call into doubt what I have written by saying that this information was ‘sceptical’?
As one observant QZ reader noted, from 10 unknowable/unverifiable pieces of information which I wrote about in 1996 – he has personally witnessed 8 of my ‘accounts’ accurately come to pass. Now while you (or he) still retain the right to doubt the final two which are still by public account unverifiable, at least he had the grace to judge me on past track record – because he, so far, has had no reason to doubt me.
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q_FORUM_ID=1&Q_FORUM_NAME=Queen+-+Serious+Discussion&TOPIC_SUBJECT=Bohemian+Rhapsody+-+Original+1975+promo+video+out-takes&Q=909042&page=2
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]MikloS wrote: [/QUOTENAME]So far i have not seen any evidence of John Stuart lying intentionally to any of us about Queen facts or tapes/recordings that does / does not exist (note: I talk about facts, not his relationship with Greg or QP or anybody else, just simply facts and trivia and information regarding Pre-Queen/Queen recordings). His research about pre-Queen activity (i am referring to Record Collector articles in 95-96) was excellent at that time. Ibex/Green/Reaction/Opposition/1984 were recordings he wrote/spoke about earlier than anybody else, and most of these are already out and downloadable, all fans can enjoy them. We havent seen evidence of the Hangman acetate or the Hectics recordings, that means possibly 2 out of 10 ultra rare recordings are not confirmed, but unconfirmed recordings does NOT prove that he is lying about those.
[/QUOTE]
Third: What I actually wrote above was: ‘A new 2006 version of 'Self Made Man' by Queen has been blasting its way through Belfast night clubs for the last two months… It was played on BBC Radio (with the permission of the band) a few weeks ago but this seems to have passed largely un-noticed on the Queen fan radar. I have been scouring e-bay for some sort of promotional version, but as yet, the track seems confined to sampled DJ sets’.
Can I point out that this third point is STILL indeed accurate and that this 'release' sounds more than just another lame Queenzone fan mix – or can you point me in the direction of any other Queenzone mixer who have been showered with such an honour?
And while the above may ‘appear’ to be a disservice of the work of some of the remixers in here, can I point out that I consider other ‘official’ mixes such as the ‘Stone Cold Crazy' – trash mix or any of the legitimate (though dreadful) Rick Rubin ‘We Will Rock You’ remixes, still fair game to add to MY Queen collection.
I also thought that the Robertson ‘Beautiful Day Instrumental Version’ (which was later officially released by Queen as a download at Queenonline), and the sublime ‘New York At Last’ remixes were also worthy of a physical release.
However, I do not manufacture product, I only catalogue and collect, and as this latest ‘Self Made Man’ is bubbling in the Belfast underground scene, what I really wanted to know was - if a physical version exists. If it does not, that does not negate the fact that it has been causing quite a bit of excitement over in Northern Ireland.
Otherwise, I have no complaint with your mail, but I do think that you could be a little more gracious.
Besides, 'Sounds like gumph then'! - really sounds like sour grapes if you have not heard the track in question.
[/QUOTE]
You ARE the topic starter! Why should I have to use a person's screen name? I felt the topic was more important.
And the scepticism is not at YOUR information. I actually re
Apparently, this tune's by the same guy:
http://queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=912436
http://queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=912436
Adam: You are most probably correct, and indeed it may just be my paranoia, but I find addressing someone by using their given name is just a polite common courtesy and certainly a far friendlier method to engage in a conversation, than calling someone ‘…the topic starter'. Therefore the latter is not a practice I can endorse, and as such I always observe such respectful pleasantries when talking to fellow correspondents, so that the said writer knows for definite that I have not snubbed them in any way. But as you so correctly observe, that may just be me.
Again, forgive me, and it may well be that good old fashioned paranoia kicking-in once more, but I certainly view the below quote as a personal slur;
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Adam Baboolal wrote: [/QUOTENAME]You're not alone with your scepticism, Al TurHao. I will also await any real proof this exists.[/QUOTE]
Now I guess you are free to view this as either transferred anger, or as further evidence of paranoid delusion, but as ‘…the topic starter' - Latest Queen single: Self Made Man - in question, the fact that you ‘await any REAL proof this exists’ strongly suggest (to my unreasonable mind) that you do indeed question my credibility as a reliable source, and without further collaborative evidence, my word can not be trusted. But as you so keenly observed, I deduce that this must be more paranoia on my part also.
It may also have something do with the fact you posted this phrase in MY thread, under this umbrella so to speak. Again, this may well be my misunderstanding, but because this mail resides in MY thread, I guess I illogically presumed that it refered to my topic! It is however nice to know that it actually refers to a different topic and different poster - but without actually making this clear to me at any time - so I guess this is further evidence of me searching for bogey men which do not exist.
Finally, I really do not know why I give so generously of myself on these forums. I can only liken it to ‘casting pearls before swine’, and again that may be the paranoia talking, but it seems some only visit here to take a delight in trying to discredit those who are doing their best to push this site forwards.
But again, that may just be my disillusioned take on it.
Again, forgive me, and it may well be that good old fashioned paranoia kicking-in once more, but I certainly view the below quote as a personal slur;
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Adam Baboolal wrote: [/QUOTENAME]You're not alone with your scepticism, Al TurHao. I will also await any real proof this exists.[/QUOTE]
Now I guess you are free to view this as either transferred anger, or as further evidence of paranoid delusion, but as ‘…the topic starter' - Latest Queen single: Self Made Man - in question, the fact that you ‘await any REAL proof this exists’ strongly suggest (to my unreasonable mind) that you do indeed question my credibility as a reliable source, and without further collaborative evidence, my word can not be trusted. But as you so keenly observed, I deduce that this must be more paranoia on my part also.
It may also have something do with the fact you posted this phrase in MY thread, under this umbrella so to speak. Again, this may well be my misunderstanding, but because this mail resides in MY thread, I guess I illogically presumed that it refered to my topic! It is however nice to know that it actually refers to a different topic and different poster - but without actually making this clear to me at any time - so I guess this is further evidence of me searching for bogey men which do not exist.
Finally, I really do not know why I give so generously of myself on these forums. I can only liken it to ‘casting pearls before swine’, and again that may be the paranoia talking, but it seems some only visit here to take a delight in trying to discredit those who are doing their best to push this site forwards.
But again, that may just be my disillusioned take on it.
The only thing that makes sense now, instead of conjectures, is tryin' to get this song for share..
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]roy_fokker wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The only thing that makes sense now, instead of conjectures, is tryin' to get this song for share..
[/QUOTE]
Bingo! So, who has it? I think Bohardy will be uploading it, actually.
Adam.
[/QUOTE]
Bingo! So, who has it? I think Bohardy will be uploading it, actually.
Adam.
John Stuart, as far as I am concerned, you belong to the creme de la creme of the queen fan universe. I have a deep respect and admire you for your passion and I read your posts with most satisfaction.
I regard you as a colector, I do not know if you have same musical skills (they would help for instance to hear differences between versions or even the old "who wrote what"). (just let me know if you need or want some assistance in the subject ;)
What I was trying to say ment in no way that I was being sceptical towards you, at all. I ment the info you presented. I tried to call your atention to the fact that the so-called remake would be signed as "Queen", authorized by band members but eventually played by other musicians. That does not make much sense, specially these days when Brian and Roger are recording a new album.
Best Regards,
AlTurHao
I regard you as a colector, I do not know if you have same musical skills (they would help for instance to hear differences between versions or even the old "who wrote what"). (just let me know if you need or want some assistance in the subject ;)
What I was trying to say ment in no way that I was being sceptical towards you, at all. I ment the info you presented. I tried to call your atention to the fact that the so-called remake would be signed as "Queen", authorized by band members but eventually played by other musicians. That does not make much sense, specially these days when Brian and Roger are recording a new album.
Best Regards,
AlTurHao
I wouldn't get excited either. Even calling this "latest Queen single" is too much.
Check this out, thats the same guy. http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=912436
He's obviously taken Freddie's bridge in the demo and made up his own rocker. Of course it sounds all different (I haven't heard it thought), thats like taking out Freddie's bridge from the Invisible Man demo and making a Man on the Prowl kind of song out of it. Could be called The Invisible Man but would not sound anything like it. I guess thats the same thing with this "remix". Officially approved? I'm really not sure. Why would Brian and Roger accept that there was a remix made out of a song that shouldn't be out there in the first place (parasites anyone?).
It's like I make a fan mix of Robbery or whatever and make it appear in the clubs and eventually it becomes "official" because it's been played on BBC radio? Can anyone prove that the band agreed with all this?
To me this is just another fan mix, that happens to appear in the clubs. Nothing official like Living on my own.
Jan
Check this out, thats the same guy. http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=912436
He's obviously taken Freddie's bridge in the demo and made up his own rocker. Of course it sounds all different (I haven't heard it thought), thats like taking out Freddie's bridge from the Invisible Man demo and making a Man on the Prowl kind of song out of it. Could be called The Invisible Man but would not sound anything like it. I guess thats the same thing with this "remix". Officially approved? I'm really not sure. Why would Brian and Roger accept that there was a remix made out of a song that shouldn't be out there in the first place (parasites anyone?).
It's like I make a fan mix of Robbery or whatever and make it appear in the clubs and eventually it becomes "official" because it's been played on BBC radio? Can anyone prove that the band agreed with all this?
To me this is just another fan mix, that happens to appear in the clubs. Nothing official like Living on my own.
Jan
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]John S Stuart wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Adam: You are most probably correct, and indeed it may just be my paranoia, but I find addressing someone by using their given name is just a polite common courtesy and certainly a far friendlier method to engage in a conversation, than calling someone ‘…the topic starter'. Therefore the latter is not a practice I can endorse, and as such I always observe such respectful pleasantries when talking to fellow correspondents, so that the said writer knows for definite that I have not snubbed them in any way. But as you so correctly observe, that may just be me.
Again, forgive me, and it may well be that good old fashioned paranoia kicking-in once more, but I certainly view the below quote as a personal slur;
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Adam Baboolal wrote: [/QUOTENAME]You're not alone with your scepticism, Al TurHao. I will also await any real proof this exists.[/QUOTE]
Now I guess you are free to view this as either transferred anger, or as further evidence of paranoid delusion, but as ‘…the topic starter' - Latest Queen single: Self Made Man - in question, the fact that you ‘await any REAL proof this exists’ strongly suggest (to my unreasonable mind) that you do indeed question my credibility as a reliable source, and without further collaborative evidence, my word can not be trusted. But as you so keenly observed, I deduce that this must be more paranoia on my part also.
It may also have something do with the fact you posted this phrase in MY thread, under this umbrella so to speak. Again, this may well be my misunderstanding, but because this mail resides in MY thread, I guess I illogically presumed that it refered to my topic! It is however nice to know that it actually refers to a different topic and different poster - but without actually making this clear to me at any time - so I guess this is further evidence of me searching for bogey men which do not exist.
Finally, I really do not know why I give so generously of myself on these forums. I can only liken it to ‘casting pearls before swine’, and again that may be the paranoia talking, but it seems some only visit here to take a delight in trying to discredit those who are doing their best to push this site forwards.
But again, that may just be my disillusioned take on it.
[/QUOTE]
Let's just forget it. But as a final note, I think that you're reading too much into these things. I'm not discrediting anything you say or do. Know that, John.
Now that it has been confirmed by a few folk here that it is really out there, it had better live up to the hype that others have layed on it. Not you, John. Just thought I'd better throw that in.
Adam.
Again, forgive me, and it may well be that good old fashioned paranoia kicking-in once more, but I certainly view the below quote as a personal slur;
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Adam Baboolal wrote: [/QUOTENAME]You're not alone with your scepticism, Al TurHao. I will also await any real proof this exists.[/QUOTE]
Now I guess you are free to view this as either transferred anger, or as further evidence of paranoid delusion, but as ‘…the topic starter' - Latest Queen single: Self Made Man - in question, the fact that you ‘await any REAL proof this exists’ strongly suggest (to my unreasonable mind) that you do indeed question my credibility as a reliable source, and without further collaborative evidence, my word can not be trusted. But as you so keenly observed, I deduce that this must be more paranoia on my part also.
It may also have something do with the fact you posted this phrase in MY thread, under this umbrella so to speak. Again, this may well be my misunderstanding, but because this mail resides in MY thread, I guess I illogically presumed that it refered to my topic! It is however nice to know that it actually refers to a different topic and different poster - but without actually making this clear to me at any time - so I guess this is further evidence of me searching for bogey men which do not exist.
Finally, I really do not know why I give so generously of myself on these forums. I can only liken it to ‘casting pearls before swine’, and again that may be the paranoia talking, but it seems some only visit here to take a delight in trying to discredit those who are doing their best to push this site forwards.
But again, that may just be my disillusioned take on it.
[/QUOTE]
Let's just forget it. But as a final note, I think that you're reading too much into these things. I'm not discrediting anything you say or do. Know that, John.
Now that it has been confirmed by a few folk here that it is really out there, it had better live up to the hype that others have layed on it. Not you, John. Just thought I'd better throw that in.
Adam.
It's A Beautiful Day Remix which you can hear on QPR shows is remix done by Robertson AND DJ Koma. I'm saying that not because DJ Koma is Russian and has the same name as me, but because there's IABD by ONLY Ross Robertson and it's different track.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]latemix wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I have heard it in Belfast, and then again at a formal event in a country club just outside Belfast.
I asked the dj for a copy at the formal dance and he took my name and address but no luck as yet :(
Its a very good track from what I can gather[/QUOTE]
Isn't that because you did it??
I asked the dj for a copy at the formal dance and he took my name and address but no luck as yet :(
Its a very good track from what I can gather[/QUOTE]
Isn't that because you did it??
No I didn't do it
And I still haven't a copy of the damn thing
And I still haven't a copy of the damn thing
So you all know I'm using this as a convenient excuse to delay my podcast this month. I'm sure that'll motivate noone to upload it :)
JSS -- have you seen any further Freddie remix competition entries? I'm guessing this would qualify...
JSS -- have you seen any further Freddie remix competition entries? I'm guessing this would qualify...
Apologies one and all, but I won't be uploading this mix anywhere, nor can I share it privately or anything.
Jan78's comments a few posts up pretty accurately sum-up the situation. It turns out this matter is currently with EMI, and I don't think they and their lawyers want anybody spreading this track around right now. And I don't want to mess with EMI's lawyers.
If you want to hear the mix that much, hop on a flight to Belfast and hit the clubs!
Jan78's comments a few posts up pretty accurately sum-up the situation. It turns out this matter is currently with EMI, and I don't think they and their lawyers want anybody spreading this track around right now. And I don't want to mess with EMI's lawyers.
If you want to hear the mix that much, hop on a flight to Belfast and hit the clubs!