Queen crest Queenzone

Copycat?

24 posts Page 2 of 2
Thread

Posts in chronological order

Search forum
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dan Corson II: The Revenge! wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Freddie also had hair. I wonder who he copied that off of.[/QUOTE]
I don't know, but I know I copied it from HIM.[/QUOTE]

This thread should be retitled "Dan Corson: Copycat?"
Well, I have a bit of a feeling that Freddie did not get the mustache originally... I just really cannot see Freddie pretending to be another musician.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=red>The Audacity of Charles wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=Mercury>Larry Lurex's Girl wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="0000FF">Thing #1<h6>hehe :D wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Freddie also had hair. I wonder who he copied that off of.[/QUOTE]


John Deacon....[/QUOTE]

Brian?[/QUOTE]

Don't be ridiculous - he copied it from Mr. Clean.[/QUOTE]


Aahahaha
Evil will always triumph 'cause good is dumb.
Coincidences? "Time waits for no one", the only difference changed the last word to 'nobody', how original and then bandmembers dressing in drag... what else do you need, why can't you people just admit it?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]argent wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Coincidences? "Time waits for no one", the only difference changed the last word to 'nobody', how original and then bandmembers dressing in drag... what else do you need, why can't you people just admit it?[/QUOTE]

... What the fuck ?!

Men were dressing in drag for a lot longer than anything involving the 80s.

If it was a trend then that Queen was part of - who CARES ?! I still think the "I Want to Break Free" video spoof parts are funny.

It's not like a bunch of men dressing up as bad imitations of women was anything new even a couple hundred years ago - guys did it for theatre and some got off on it.

Clichés in lyrics happen. But, for heaven's sake, after listening to the "Les Misérables" musical recently, I don't have anything against whatever Queen did ("I feel my pain inside me like a knife"... "I am reaching but I fall"...).

There are a LIMITED number of choices in the world. Sure, Queen may have been influenced - and they influenced people, too. I don't think they calculated every aspect of their perceptible beings to be a direct theft from someone else.

Why don't you admit that you're being foolish ?

O... I forgot - you're life is totally original and filled with things that have TOTALLY NEVER HAPPENED BEFORE. I mean, forget about Germany - look at how many people live in Canada ! Wow, that's not a coincidence, somewhere along the line, you or your ancestors TOTALLY RIPPED OFF some other people who had the grand idea of immigration.
To 'The Audacity of Charles':

1. I am not a musician 2. sure there are similarities between those guys but what i mentioned is just TOO similar

Ex, A. Two successful bands. But when one dresses up for an album, and then another one decides to do the same in a video.. its been copied.
B. Two very famous singers. One moves to Germany, then another one does the same. Pattern?

Now thats no coincidence, maybe he thought thats what makes him a rockstar.. but instead it looks like he copied off two other big rockstars.
Sure, you are not a musician. Your ancestors were perhaps peasants who wanted to go somewhere for a new life and a chance to "make it" - they TOTALLY RIPPED OFF this idea from those who thought that going to the 'new' continent would lead to plenty.

What have you named... ?

Clichés in songs. This is NOTHING new. At all.

Moving to Germany. What the Hell ? It's a country. I don't see a direct connection.

Dressing in women's clothing. Oooo - that's SO horrible. And OBVIOUSLY copied. If it was a trend, so what ? What if Freddie had always wanted them to do it, but only was able to goad them into it after someone did it first ?

Your argument is a LOGICAL FALLACY - "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" - meaning that "Because X happened after Y, therefore, X happened because of Y". It is a fallacy of argument.

You've just drawn more sketchy conclusions than the latest conspiracy novel.

Obviously, other human beings influence other human beings. This doesn't make someone a "copy cat".

On the subject of copying people - I DO remember reading something about it, maybe Brian May saying something about how early on Freddie "copied" others in a way that he eventually found himself. Something like that, don't really remember.
WHY are you still talking about ancestors? I'm talking about at that time, that he suddenly made those moves right after other musicians.
Yes if it was a hundred years ago, it would make sense, but all that so sudden looks like copying.
[QUOTENAME]Your argument is a LOGICAL FALLACY - "post hoc, ergo propter hoc" - meaning that "Because X happened after Y, therefore, X happened because of Y". It is a fallacy of argument.[/QUOTENAME]

And the bit about ancestors is only poking fun at you. AT THE TIME they came to the "new world" or whatever, they were doubtlessly doing so RIGHT AFTER someone else had the idea. If you don't speak English fluently, I can understand how you might not pick up on the facetious nature of the comment.

If you have any quotes or testimony to back up your argument, please provide them and I shall listen in earnest. But all you have here is the plot for a conspiracy novel.