Ah yeah!
Let's get it on!
http://www.hillaryclinton.com/
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Yeah, that made my day. Fucking hilarious.
PS: No mail yet & you have email. :*
PS: No mail yet & you have email. :*
Oh no...
Ugh......................
We have had a Bush or a Clinton in power in the US since 1981.......................
Enough is enough. Vote for somebody else, anybody else. 28 years of rule from the same two families? No thanks.
Personally, I don't even see Hillary making it out of the Dem primaries. I think that the next Pres is someone that as of now is completely off the radar.
Again, how can the people clamoring for change in this country, to a man or woman, in good faith vote for someone who has been part of the problem?
We have had a Bush or a Clinton in power in the US since 1981.......................
Enough is enough. Vote for somebody else, anybody else. 28 years of rule from the same two families? No thanks.
Personally, I don't even see Hillary making it out of the Dem primaries. I think that the next Pres is someone that as of now is completely off the radar.
Again, how can the people clamoring for change in this country, to a man or woman, in good faith vote for someone who has been part of the problem?
Anything's better than one of Bush's background guys.
Having said that, I don't think the democrats could do much worse than Hillary C.
Having said that, I don't think the democrats could do much worse than Hillary C.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Serry... wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Oh no...[/QUOTE]
Oh yes.
Oh yes.
The next Pres, if a Republican, will have to be completely removed from Bush.
Hillary stands no chance, but has deep pockets, and you can never count out the back room dealings of the Clintons.
Obama has entirely too much baggage to make it thru the primaries.
Rudy would be interesting, but his personal life will give the media far too big a target for him to really be viable.
Gingrich has great ideas, but he was blackballed by the media in 1998, so he isn't viable either.
If people think that Bush is controversial, just wait and see what happens if Hillary is indeed on the ticket.
I don't think, though, that the Dems are that silly. She is probably the only candidate on that side to guarantee a Republican victory in '08.
Hillary stands no chance, but has deep pockets, and you can never count out the back room dealings of the Clintons.
Obama has entirely too much baggage to make it thru the primaries.
Rudy would be interesting, but his personal life will give the media far too big a target for him to really be viable.
Gingrich has great ideas, but he was blackballed by the media in 1998, so he isn't viable either.
If people think that Bush is controversial, just wait and see what happens if Hillary is indeed on the ticket.
I don't think, though, that the Dems are that silly. She is probably the only candidate on that side to guarantee a Republican victory in '08.
Why do you think Rupert Murdoch is paying for her campaign? It's not 'cause he's switched sides, that's for sure!!!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Anything's better than one of Bush's background guys.[/QUOTE]
Couldn't agree more. But still, are the Democrates willing to risk like that???
Couldn't agree more. But still, are the Democrates willing to risk like that???
I think, even though I would prefer the Republicans to win in '08, that Hillary running on the Dem side would be very very bad for our country.
We need new ideas, new people, not the same old rehashed nonsense that we get.
Murdoch funding her only goes to show that there is literally not much of a difference between the two parties. The country is run by big business and big money, period.
The question is, how do we, as Americans, break this cycle?
We need new ideas, new people, not the same old rehashed nonsense that we get.
Murdoch funding her only goes to show that there is literally not much of a difference between the two parties. The country is run by big business and big money, period.
The question is, how do we, as Americans, break this cycle?
If Hillary runs against John McCain, I'm most likely to vote for him instead of her despite the fact that I tend to vote Democrat. Hillary is IMO too partisan and I frankly was absolutely dissapointed of her support Israel during the Lebanon conflict last year when both sides were targetting innocent civilians.
I think it's pathetic that people pick who to vote for without watching a fuckin' debate. It really opens your mind to the choice you will be making to ensure what candidates you consider capable of running your country instead of saying... "I'll vote for this candidate because he/she seems nicer".
It makes me sick when Oprah Winfrey has endorsed Barack Obama on the simple and sole fact that he's black (C'mon, we all know it's true). Obama is more than welcome to the presidential race but people need to compare the different proposals of the candidates and not only make picks based on image like a naive teenage girl who follows the mainstream on everything.
I think it's pathetic that people pick who to vote for without watching a fuckin' debate. It really opens your mind to the choice you will be making to ensure what candidates you consider capable of running your country instead of saying... "I'll vote for this candidate because he/she seems nicer".
It makes me sick when Oprah Winfrey has endorsed Barack Obama on the simple and sole fact that he's black (C'mon, we all know it's true). Obama is more than welcome to the presidential race but people need to compare the different proposals of the candidates and not only make picks based on image like a naive teenage girl who follows the mainstream on everything.
Jingles for President 2008
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]PieterMC wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Jingles for President 2008[/QUOTE]
Erin for VicePrez, and you Pieter...
Would you mind being the first lady?
Erin for VicePrez, and you Pieter...
Would you mind being the first lady?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Haystacks Calhounski wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Ugh......................
We have had a Bush or a Clinton in power in the US since 1981.......................
Enough is enough. Vote for somebody else, anybody else. 28 years of rule from the same two families? No thanks.
Personally, I don't even see Hillary making it out of the Dem primaries. I think that the next Pres is someone that as of now is completely off the radar.
Again, how can the people clamoring for change in this country, to a man or woman, in good faith vote for someone who has been part of the problem?
[/QUOTE]
when bush was elected the first time i said the same thing. people my age have only known a bush or clinton power....
honestly at this point i dont care as long as someone gets rid of bush in the near future. he has ruined our country.
that obama guy seems pretty cool (i said OBAMA not osama XD)
We have had a Bush or a Clinton in power in the US since 1981.......................
Enough is enough. Vote for somebody else, anybody else. 28 years of rule from the same two families? No thanks.
Personally, I don't even see Hillary making it out of the Dem primaries. I think that the next Pres is someone that as of now is completely off the radar.
Again, how can the people clamoring for change in this country, to a man or woman, in good faith vote for someone who has been part of the problem?
[/QUOTE]
when bush was elected the first time i said the same thing. people my age have only known a bush or clinton power....
honestly at this point i dont care as long as someone gets rid of bush in the near future. he has ruined our country.
that obama guy seems pretty cool (i said OBAMA not osama XD)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Mr.Jingles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Would you mind being the first lady?[/QUOTE]
:-P
Would you mind being the first lady?[/QUOTE]
:-P