[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Wiley wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I am extremely grateful to Paul Rodgers for being able to bring that spark and excitement back into Brian and Roger's eyes and taking them on the road.[/QUOTE]
It's not Pual Rodgers that's put the sparkle back into their eyes, it's the money
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]kenny8 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Wiley wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I am extremely grateful to Paul Rodgers for being able to bring that spark and excitement back into Brian and Roger's eyes and taking them on the road.[/QUOTE]
It's not Pual Rodgers that's put the sparkle back into their eyes, it's the money[/QUOTE]
your a jerk kenny8....once again I'd like to know why they would want the money...I mean have you seen Roger's houses? They have a talent and they're continuing for their fans...NOT THE MONEY...YOU IDIOT!!! Maybe your just jealous...cause you dont have that much money...your obssessed with this money thing...enough is enough..GOD!! SMITTY is right, you are a jerk!
It's not Pual Rodgers that's put the sparkle back into their eyes, it's the money[/QUOTE]
your a jerk kenny8....once again I'd like to know why they would want the money...I mean have you seen Roger's houses? They have a talent and they're continuing for their fans...NOT THE MONEY...YOU IDIOT!!! Maybe your just jealous...cause you dont have that much money...your obssessed with this money thing...enough is enough..GOD!! SMITTY is right, you are a jerk!
This thread is almost as good as SomebodyWhoLoves assertion that all women like to be dominated sexually.
As for the 'money' topic going on here - Uhm, they can't be motivated by money. About two or three people in this thread have already said that the new album/tour won't make any money; thus proving how 'bad' it will be.
This is why I hate the internet, everyone would've either thrown a punch or shook hands by now if it were in a room somewhere.
As for the 'money' topic going on here - Uhm, they can't be motivated by money. About two or three people in this thread have already said that the new album/tour won't make any money; thus proving how 'bad' it will be.
This is why I hate the internet, everyone would've either thrown a punch or shook hands by now if it were in a room somewhere.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]SomebodyWhoLoves wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Queen is, whether you like it or not, dead since 1991.[/QUOTE]
I'm happy to break it to you, but Brian May, Roger Taylor and even John Deacon are still alive! Do you know what that means? That means if they're up to it, they could actually continue their career under the name "Queen!" Isn't that fantastic? I would love for you to pay close attention to these words...
"You know something there was, there's been a lot of rumours lately about a certain band called Queen, and the rumours are that, the rumours are that we're gonna split up, what do you think? They're talking from here! (gestures)
My apologies but I say what I want. You know what I mean? So forget those rumours, we're gonna stay together until we fucking well die I'm sure. I keep, I must tell you, I keep wanting to leave but they won't let me, also I suppose we're not, we're not bad for four ageing
Queens are we? Really what do you think?"-Freddie Mercury, Live at Wembley Stadium [1986]
I'm sure you're brilliant enough and wity enough to realize the most important part of that speech. "We're gonna stay together until we fucking well die I'm sure." Those words should be taken seriously. As far as I'm concerned, from what he said that day he wouldn't want to have seen his band mates to have given up after he past away. When he said that, he didn't mean that once one of them died they should all call it quits, it's when they all die that the end of Queen should be.
That being said, I (yes, this is my opinion) believe that Freddie would not have been offended at all if he knew that Paul Rodgers would one day sing the songs that him and his band wrote together as a team. Also, take into consideration of Freddie Mercury's reaction to hearing that one day someone would imitate his vocals and even prance about like him on stage along with the rest of Queen.
Did you ever get annoyed when someone would play that game where whatever you said and did they said and did? Ever find that irratating? Imagine how Freddie would feel to see someone in his own band who is actually "replacing" him. It's one thing for a tribute band to imitate Queen, but it's another thing if Queen actually became the tribute band. Think about that for a minute.
The great thing about the collaboration between Queen and Paul Rodgers is that they are in no way trying to replace Freddie Mercury. Notice that the title of this new collaboration is called:
QUEEN + PAUL RODGERS
Not...
QUEEN AND THEIR FRONTMAN "PAUL RODGERS!"
It's not called Queen...it's called Queen + Paul Rodgers. Paul Rodgers is his own artist...and a fine one at that.
Queen is, whether you like it or not, dead since 1991.[/QUOTE]
I'm happy to break it to you, but Brian May, Roger Taylor and even John Deacon are still alive! Do you know what that means? That means if they're up to it, they could actually continue their career under the name "Queen!" Isn't that fantastic? I would love for you to pay close attention to these words...
"You know something there was, there's been a lot of rumours lately about a certain band called Queen, and the rumours are that, the rumours are that we're gonna split up, what do you think? They're talking from here! (gestures)
My apologies but I say what I want. You know what I mean? So forget those rumours, we're gonna stay together until we fucking well die I'm sure. I keep, I must tell you, I keep wanting to leave but they won't let me, also I suppose we're not, we're not bad for four ageing
Queens are we? Really what do you think?"-Freddie Mercury, Live at Wembley Stadium [1986]
I'm sure you're brilliant enough and wity enough to realize the most important part of that speech. "We're gonna stay together until we fucking well die I'm sure." Those words should be taken seriously. As far as I'm concerned, from what he said that day he wouldn't want to have seen his band mates to have given up after he past away. When he said that, he didn't mean that once one of them died they should all call it quits, it's when they all die that the end of Queen should be.
That being said, I (yes, this is my opinion) believe that Freddie would not have been offended at all if he knew that Paul Rodgers would one day sing the songs that him and his band wrote together as a team. Also, take into consideration of Freddie Mercury's reaction to hearing that one day someone would imitate his vocals and even prance about like him on stage along with the rest of Queen.
Did you ever get annoyed when someone would play that game where whatever you said and did they said and did? Ever find that irratating? Imagine how Freddie would feel to see someone in his own band who is actually "replacing" him. It's one thing for a tribute band to imitate Queen, but it's another thing if Queen actually became the tribute band. Think about that for a minute.
The great thing about the collaboration between Queen and Paul Rodgers is that they are in no way trying to replace Freddie Mercury. Notice that the title of this new collaboration is called:
QUEEN + PAUL RODGERS
Not...
QUEEN AND THEIR FRONTMAN "PAUL RODGERS!"
It's not called Queen...it's called Queen + Paul Rodgers. Paul Rodgers is his own artist...and a fine one at that.
Why is everyone soo.. umm Angry when someone posts their opinion?
seriously, even when the recordings come out we'll still have the different opinions so don't growl at someone if they have a different one than you
seriously, even when the recordings come out we'll still have the different opinions so don't growl at someone if they have a different one than you
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=Mercury>Larry Lurex's Girl wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Why is everyone soo.. umm Angry when someone posts their opinion?
seriously, even when the recordings come out we'll still have the different opinions so don't growl at someone if they have a different one than you[/QUOTE]
who is this guy on your profile and why?
seriously, even when the recordings come out we'll still have the different opinions so don't growl at someone if they have a different one than you[/QUOTE]
who is this guy on your profile and why?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=Mercury>Larry Lurex's Girl wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Why is everyone soo.. umm Angry when someone posts their opinion?
seriously, even when the recordings come out we'll still have the different opinions so don't growl at someone if they have a different one than you[/QUOTE]
Actually, some of us might feel resentment towards each other, but I certainly don't! I just love to discuss and share my different opinions. I also enjoy hearing what other fans have to say. These forums would get boring if we all just "got along."
seriously, even when the recordings come out we'll still have the different opinions so don't growl at someone if they have a different one than you[/QUOTE]
Actually, some of us might feel resentment towards each other, but I certainly don't! I just love to discuss and share my different opinions. I also enjoy hearing what other fans have to say. These forums would get boring if we all just "got along."
SOMEBODYWHOLOVES wrote:
"Your statement about the lover is illogical. If your gf or wife died, you can have another wife or gf.
But would you call your new gf / wife the same name as your former wife?
Would you expect your family and friends to also think your new gf/wife is your old gf/wife?
I think not!"
I apologize about that. My bad. What I meant to say was:
"If you passed away, would you want your lover to never love again?"
I swear to God I will never drink before I go on Queenzone ever again! I can't believe I fucked my words up like that. Once again, sorry about that!
"Your statement about the lover is illogical. If your gf or wife died, you can have another wife or gf.
But would you call your new gf / wife the same name as your former wife?
Would you expect your family and friends to also think your new gf/wife is your old gf/wife?
I think not!"
I apologize about that. My bad. What I meant to say was:
"If you passed away, would you want your lover to never love again?"
I swear to God I will never drink before I go on Queenzone ever again! I can't believe I fucked my words up like that. Once again, sorry about that!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=Mercury>Larry Lurex's Girl wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Why is everyone soo.. umm Angry when someone posts their opinion?
seriously, even when the recordings come out we'll still have the different opinions so don't growl at someone if they have a different one than you[/QUOTE]
Actually, some of us might feel resentment towards each other, but I certainly don't! I just love to discuss and share my different opinions. I also enjoy hearing what other fans have to say. These forums would get boring if we all just "got along." [/QUOTE]
Who give's a shit what you think. Your nothing, your not worth a mention on a shit... just Kidding...eheheh I agree with what your saying. This place does have allot of resentment for everyone. If your making a spelling mistake, or if you make an error in facts, you will get shot down very quick.... But, who gives toot what the other people think anyway...
seriously, even when the recordings come out we'll still have the different opinions so don't growl at someone if they have a different one than you[/QUOTE]
Actually, some of us might feel resentment towards each other, but I certainly don't! I just love to discuss and share my different opinions. I also enjoy hearing what other fans have to say. These forums would get boring if we all just "got along." [/QUOTE]
Who give's a shit what you think. Your nothing, your not worth a mention on a shit... just Kidding...eheheh I agree with what your saying. This place does have allot of resentment for everyone. If your making a spelling mistake, or if you make an error in facts, you will get shot down very quick.... But, who gives toot what the other people think anyway...
^Holy crap! You scared the shit out of me! For a moment there I actually thought I was going to get into a senseless argument that would have absolutely nothing to do with Queen! lol
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME]^Holy crap! You scared the shit out of me! For a moment there I actually thought I was going to get into a senseless argument that would have absolutely nothing to do with Queen! lol[/QUOTE]
Lol...Thats the hesence of this site.. Oh well,,, Friends will be friends.
Lol...Thats the hesence of this site.. Oh well,,, Friends will be friends.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]taylormad101 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I mean have you seen Roger's houses? [/QUOTE]
Great reasoning as to why this continuation of "Queen" isn't motivated by greed, you retard.
If this album does see the light of day and is received favorably, or approaches the sales of an original "Queen" album, I'll willingly take it all back. Sady it'll probably only denigrate the band's reputation. "Made In Heaven" was a respectable place to stop.
Great reasoning as to why this continuation of "Queen" isn't motivated by greed, you retard.
If this album does see the light of day and is received favorably, or approaches the sales of an original "Queen" album, I'll willingly take it all back. Sady it'll probably only denigrate the band's reputation. "Made In Heaven" was a respectable place to stop.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]kenny8 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]taylormad101 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I mean have you seen Roger's houses? [/QUOTE]
Great reasoning as to why this continuation of "Queen" isn't motivated by greed, you retard.
If this album does see the light of day and is received favorably, or approaches the sales of an original "Queen" album, I'll willingly take it all back. Sady it'll probably only denigrate the band's reputation. "Made In Heaven" was a respectable place to stop.[/QUOTE]
I have to agree, "Made in Heaven" was the most respectable place to stop. However, I fully support Brian May and Roger Taylor's decision to collaborate with Paul Rodgers.
Here's something for all of you to think about:
Perhaps we're underestimating the new album a little too much.
Great reasoning as to why this continuation of "Queen" isn't motivated by greed, you retard.
If this album does see the light of day and is received favorably, or approaches the sales of an original "Queen" album, I'll willingly take it all back. Sady it'll probably only denigrate the band's reputation. "Made In Heaven" was a respectable place to stop.[/QUOTE]
I have to agree, "Made in Heaven" was the most respectable place to stop. However, I fully support Brian May and Roger Taylor's decision to collaborate with Paul Rodgers.
Here's something for all of you to think about:
Perhaps we're underestimating the new album a little too much.