I heartily agree that Queen shouldn't release a new album without Freddie Mercury... and not only without Freddie Mercury, but also without John Deacon.
I mean, Queen are like an iconic figure for me. How the hell can they decide to release new music without two of their members. That was what was so great about it - the four of them contributed and made songs together. Who the hell is Paul Rodgers anyway? Queen are known for the falmboyant ways of Freddie on stage - I mean that was one of the great things about Queen. What, is this 50-something Rodgers gonna perform like Freddie? Running around with the Union Jack and the microphone stand? The bastard would have a bloody heart attack.
Nobody can ever replace Freddie. He himself said it on Live at Wembley '86, Who Wants To Live Forever - "we'll stay together till we bloody well die, I'm sure of it". Well he's dead, and now two of the surviving members are replacing him???? They're in it for the money OBVIOUSLY. They're disgracing the Queen name by making an album with Paul Rodgers. If they want they should just create a new band and make an album with him. Not Queen + Paul Rodgers. That's bullshit.
I think Deacon did the best choice by retiring back in the 1990s.
What I'd like to see is the three of them performing live once more, playing their classic songs, and using a good vocalist... some guy who was big in the 70s like Queen... I dunno, maybe Elton John or Paul McCartney or something.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
YOU'RE ALL GOING TO BURN IN HELL FOR THE NEW QUEEN+PAUL RODGERS ALBUM THAT HASN'T EVEN BEEN RECORDED YET!!!! REPENT, SINNERS, REPENT!!!!! THE APOCALYPSE IS UPON IS!!!!! MAKE GOOD WITH LORD MERCURY OR THOU SHALT ALL BURN FOR ETERNITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RIP SMILE.
Oh hey Zeb, apparently ol' PT said on his site that the 'oo are coming to Oz later this year. Just wanted to let you know.
Oh! OH! OH FUCK YEAH
If they leave Perth offa the list, I might have to go twist his windmilling arm and teach him a lesson.
If they leave Perth offa the list, I might have to go twist his windmilling arm and teach him a lesson.
They were in Sydney three years ago... and in Auckland, Brisbane, Adelaide, and Melbourne almost forty years ago... of course, I have no fucking clue if any of those cities are near Perth, and I'm almost certain that Auckland is in New Zealand...
If I go to Hell for listening to Q+PR, does that mean I'm going to be where Freddie is ?
... Or is that a different level of Hell ?
... Is it walking distance ?
...
I always do get them mixed up...
Regardless, Hell should be a fantastic place - I hear that anyone who was anyone is there.
... Or is that a different level of Hell ?
... Is it walking distance ?
...
I always do get them mixed up...
Regardless, Hell should be a fantastic place - I hear that anyone who was anyone is there.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=red>The Audacity of Charles wrote: [/QUOTENAME]If I go to Hell for listening to Q+PR, does that mean I'm going to be where Freddie is ?
... Or is that a different level of Hell ?
... Is it walking distance ?
...
I always do get them mixed up...
Regardless, Hell should be a fantastic place - I hear that anyone who was anyone is there.[/QUOTE]
Shh shh, you're interrupting my conversation with Zebonka about The Who! In fact, this thread is now about The Who and all their greatness.
... Or is that a different level of Hell ?
... Is it walking distance ?
...
I always do get them mixed up...
Regardless, Hell should be a fantastic place - I hear that anyone who was anyone is there.[/QUOTE]
Shh shh, you're interrupting my conversation with Zebonka about The Who! In fact, this thread is now about The Who and all their greatness.
Oh, Perth is a nice enough place, but it's bloody isolated. I think we're close to Singapore than we are the East Coast - or something ridiculous like that...
Anyway it shouldn't be an issue. You'd think The Who have enough money to fly over here!!
Anyway it shouldn't be an issue. You'd think The Who have enough money to fly over here!!
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dr. Perry Cox wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Shh shh, you're interrupting my conversation with Zebonka about The Who! In fact, this thread is now about The Who and all their greatness.[/QUOTE]
Well, of course The Who are welcome in Hell, too !
Well, of course The Who are welcome in Hell, too !
And yet another mentally deficient finds his way to Queenzone.
I disagree, I think they should kick Paul out of a plane, and then get someone with a better voice and nice eyes, but they're not replacing Freddie, they're just continuing there love of music with another artist, but I still think that they shouldn't call it Queen, maybe Death Rides A Sandwich or something
~yawn~
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]NEOLOGiX wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I heartily agree that Queen shouldn't release a new album without Freddie Mercury... and not only without Freddie Mercury, but also without John Deacon.
I mean, Queen are like an iconic figure for me. How the hell can they decide to release new music without two of their members. That was what was so great about it - the four of them contributed and made songs together. Who the hell is Paul Rodgers anyway? Queen are known for the falmboyant ways of Freddie on stage - I mean that was one of the great things about Queen. What, is this 50-something Rodgers gonna perform like Freddie? Running around with the Union Jack and the microphone stand? The bastard would have a bloody heart attack.
Nobody can ever replace Freddie. He himself said it on Live at Wembley '86, Who Wants To Live Forever - "we'll stay together till we bloody well die, I'm sure of it". Well he's dead, and now two of the surviving members are replacing him???? They're in it for the money OBVIOUSLY. They're disgracing the Queen name by making an album with Paul Rodgers. If they want they should just create a new band and make an album with him. Not Queen + Paul Rodgers. That's bullshit.
I think Deacon did the best choice by retiring back in the 1990s.
What I'd like to see is the three of them performing live once more, playing their classic songs, and using a good vocalist... some guy who was big in the 70s like Queen... I dunno, maybe Elton John or Paul McCartney or something.[/QUOTE] I have a lot of respect for john Deacon for retiring, Queen are no more. I think we all agree on that, but I still think paul, brian, and roger could be a all star rock band. Queen?...it's definitely not queen, it sounds nothing like them. Your showing a bit of ignorance by saying "Who is paul rodgers?" he's only one of the best rock singers in history.
I mean, Queen are like an iconic figure for me. How the hell can they decide to release new music without two of their members. That was what was so great about it - the four of them contributed and made songs together. Who the hell is Paul Rodgers anyway? Queen are known for the falmboyant ways of Freddie on stage - I mean that was one of the great things about Queen. What, is this 50-something Rodgers gonna perform like Freddie? Running around with the Union Jack and the microphone stand? The bastard would have a bloody heart attack.
Nobody can ever replace Freddie. He himself said it on Live at Wembley '86, Who Wants To Live Forever - "we'll stay together till we bloody well die, I'm sure of it". Well he's dead, and now two of the surviving members are replacing him???? They're in it for the money OBVIOUSLY. They're disgracing the Queen name by making an album with Paul Rodgers. If they want they should just create a new band and make an album with him. Not Queen + Paul Rodgers. That's bullshit.
I think Deacon did the best choice by retiring back in the 1990s.
What I'd like to see is the three of them performing live once more, playing their classic songs, and using a good vocalist... some guy who was big in the 70s like Queen... I dunno, maybe Elton John or Paul McCartney or something.[/QUOTE] I have a lot of respect for john Deacon for retiring, Queen are no more. I think we all agree on that, but I still think paul, brian, and roger could be a all star rock band. Queen?...it's definitely not queen, it sounds nothing like them. Your showing a bit of ignorance by saying "Who is paul rodgers?" he's only one of the best rock singers in history.
your face is a mortal sin >.>