Logging on QZ sometimes is like going to the war. You have to shake hands with your friends, kiss your wife and kids, check your armor vest before click "Enter" button...
Thread
Posts in chronological order
That sounds about right, yeah.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Please...we all saw what we saw. Your tricks don't do any good.
I saw the real you when you banned me, don't give me this shit. You are abusing the position Richard gave you, and you know it.[/QUOTE]
A post like this is a proof that banning you is not a mistake.[/QUOTE]
He never posted the distgusting shit (literally) that you did...and that is basically my point.
and stop being a kiss ass girly boy.
I saw the real you when you banned me, don't give me this shit. You are abusing the position Richard gave you, and you know it.[/QUOTE]
A post like this is a proof that banning you is not a mistake.[/QUOTE]
He never posted the distgusting shit (literally) that you did...and that is basically my point.
and stop being a kiss ass girly boy.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zeni wrote: [/QUOTENAME]And the rest of your post makes no sense to me, even after several readings. As for any sense of embarrassment, I feel none, but then I'm not the one hurling insults and trying to start a coup over a supposedly deleted thread on a Queen message board.
[/QUOTE]
Of course it doesn't make sense if you don't wanna read the truth. I said you're an arse licker. That shouldn't be so hard to understand. It seems that your fucking racist and bigot friend Bob the Shit has the same problems to read/understand. No surprise at all.
[/QUOTE]
Of course it doesn't make sense if you don't wanna read the truth. I said you're an arse licker. That shouldn't be so hard to understand. It seems that your fucking racist and bigot friend Bob the Shit has the same problems to read/understand. No surprise at all.
The problem here is that people tend to see Zeni's passionately reactionary pseudo-intellectualism (i.e. dogma phrased as scholarship) as genuine intelligence.
Excuse me if I don't see what the big deal is. But, I mean, the thread is back, and even IF YV deleted it, restored it, or moved it, nothing you say or do will change anything.
By the way, I sure do love Queenzone.
By the way, I sure do love Queenzone.
Well, I clearly remember that yesterday night I checked the Queenzone forum at around midnight and I saw the thread in the Queenzone forum. I remember that I checked the link and saw the cartoon (and I thought it was funny). So the thread was not deleted, just moved. Or maybe I didn't want understand what thread you're talking about. In that case, I apologize.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The problem here is that people tend to see Zeni's passionately reactionary pseudo-intellectualism (i.e. dogma phrased as scholarship) as genuine intelligence.[/QUOTE]
I don't think Zeni tries to look like some intellectual. Unlike other morons.
By the way, if that old thread I started is so bad, so what can we say about retards who bump it up?
I don't think Zeni tries to look like some intellectual. Unlike other morons.
By the way, if that old thread I started is so bad, so what can we say about retards who bump it up?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]AC wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Well, I clearly remember that yesterday night I checked the Queenzone forum at around midnight and I saw the thread in the Queenzone forum. I remember that I checked the link and saw the cartoon (and I thought it was funny). So the thread was not deleted, just moved. Or maybe I didn't want understand what thread you're talking about. In that case, I apologize.[/QUOTE]
I was talking about Sasha's thread, not mine. Her thread is gone, for some "strange" reason.
I was talking about Sasha's thread, not mine. Her thread is gone, for some "strange" reason.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The problem here is that people tend to see Zeni's passionately reactionary pseudo-intellectualism (i.e. dogma phrased as scholarship) as genuine intelligence.[/QUOTE]
I don't think Zeni tries to look like some intellectual. Unlike other morons.
By the way, if that old thread I started is so bad, so what can we say about retards who bump it up?[/QUOTE]
That would be what we call 'providing evidence'.
I don't think Zeni tries to look like some intellectual. Unlike other morons.
By the way, if that old thread I started is so bad, so what can we say about retards who bump it up?[/QUOTE]
That would be what we call 'providing evidence'.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The problem here is that people tend to see Zeni's passionately reactionary pseudo-intellectualism (i.e. dogma phrased as scholarship) as genuine intelligence.[/QUOTE]
By the way, if that old thread I started is so bad, so what can we say about retards who bump it up?[/QUOTE]
Exactly. One would honestly think that TQ had more interesting things to do rather than search for threads written by someone he doesn't like, and bash them there.
By the way, if that old thread I started is so bad, so what can we say about retards who bump it up?[/QUOTE]
Exactly. One would honestly think that TQ had more interesting things to do rather than search for threads written by someone he doesn't like, and bash them there.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=660066>Pomponias Marrion wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="lime">Raf840 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]The problem here is that people tend to see Zeni's passionately reactionary pseudo-intellectualism (i.e. dogma phrased as scholarship) as genuine intelligence.[/QUOTE]
By the way, if that old thread I started is so bad, so what can we say about retards who bump it up?[/QUOTE]
Exactly. One would honestly think that TQ had more interesting things to do rather than search for threads written by someone he doesn't like, and bash them there. [/QUOTE]
I see your point. ;-)
By the way, if that old thread I started is so bad, so what can we say about retards who bump it up?[/QUOTE]
Exactly. One would honestly think that TQ had more interesting things to do rather than search for threads written by someone he doesn't like, and bash them there. [/QUOTE]
I see your point. ;-)
Naturally you do; the two of you are equally stupid.
now now children, name-calling is unessesary.
*chews popcorn*
*chews popcorn*
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Naturally you do; the two of you are equally stupid.[/QUOTE]
Shhhhh, shhhhh.
Shhhhh, shhhhh.