Hey, you wrote a book!
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I did? Where'd you read that?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dan Corson III: Season of the Witch wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Hey, you wrote a book![/QUOTE]
Lester wrote a book??? I doubt it.
Lester wrote a book??? I doubt it.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Lester Burnham wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Some people just can't read, Dan :-\[/QUOTE]
I can read books, but I can't read you...
...at least not until it ships :)
I can read books, but I can't read you...
...at least not until it ships :)
I love Queen, and I love Brian. However, he's been a good revisionist when it comes to history. Why change the authorship of I Want It All when the band agreed they would sign Queen as song authors to avoid fighting over the royalties? Did he consult Freddie (oh, wait, he's dead) or John (the guy doesn't bother anymore)?
And, what did Brian mean when he said "In what we are doing now, Paul sings it for real, on the take"? Did not Freddie sing it for real?
If, as Brian said, this is something new and different from what Queen did before, why they don't just name a new band and lay the name Queen to rest? I have no problem if they want to continue making music. That's what they do. However, I have a huge problem if they are using the name Queen.
And, what did Brian mean when he said "In what we are doing now, Paul sings it for real, on the take"? Did not Freddie sing it for real?
If, as Brian said, this is something new and different from what Queen did before, why they don't just name a new band and lay the name Queen to rest? I have no problem if they want to continue making music. That's what they do. However, I have a huge problem if they are using the name Queen.
I think he might mean Paul records his vocals as the initial Bri and Rog tracks are recorded.
In other words, he doesn't overdub his lead vocal later. Over what's called a guide vocal. Which is how it is typically done.
Paul has a reputation as a one-take wonder. He nails the finished track in one or two takes so that approach doesn't surprise me at all.
In other words, he doesn't overdub his lead vocal later. Over what's called a guide vocal. Which is how it is typically done.
Paul has a reputation as a one-take wonder. He nails the finished track in one or two takes so that approach doesn't surprise me at all.
please , if you don't like that brian is taking over the leadership of the queen name, then don't listen to him.get a life and get lost you ass holes.
freddie died that was not brian , rodger ,john or your or my fault.if brian and rodger want to move on ,that there right, i for one LOVE IT, so get a life .i saw 10 shows on the tours and loved everyone of them.and will buy the new cd, and laugh when it sell's all over the world and your all sitting there saying queen died in 1991. no freddie died in 1991. (RIP he was the best front man of all time )
GO AWAY AND LIVE IN THE PAST , PLEASE
freddie died that was not brian , rodger ,john or your or my fault.if brian and rodger want to move on ,that there right, i for one LOVE IT, so get a life .i saw 10 shows on the tours and loved everyone of them.and will buy the new cd, and laugh when it sell's all over the world and your all sitting there saying queen died in 1991. no freddie died in 1991. (RIP he was the best front man of all time )
GO AWAY AND LIVE IN THE PAST , PLEASE
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]PieterMC wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Dan Corson III: Season of the Witch wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Hey, you wrote a book![/QUOTE]
Lester wrote a book??? I doubt it.[/QUOTE]That's what I said.
Lester wrote a book??? I doubt it.[/QUOTE]That's what I said.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Knute wrote: [/QUOTENAME]In other words, he doesn't overdub his lead vocal later. Over what's called a guide vocal. Which is how it is typically done.[/QUOTE]
It's not that that's how it's typically done, it's just that that's how Freddie used to do it. He insisted that there was a complete backing track (much like the ones on "The Greatest Karaoke Hits") so that he could add the vocals last. The fact that they are recording in a different manner with a different singer is yet another proof that they are a different group. But they are 50% of Queen which should entitle them to use the name and the legacy they worked so hard to create.
@YourValentine: I couldn't have said it better myself :)
V.
It's not that that's how it's typically done, it's just that that's how Freddie used to do it. He insisted that there was a complete backing track (much like the ones on "The Greatest Karaoke Hits") so that he could add the vocals last. The fact that they are recording in a different manner with a different singer is yet another proof that they are a different group. But they are 50% of Queen which should entitle them to use the name and the legacy they worked so hard to create.
@YourValentine: I couldn't have said it better myself :)
V.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]ermin wrote: [/QUOTENAME]And, what did Brian mean when he said "In what we are doing now, Paul sings it for real, on the take"? Did not Freddie sing it for real?[/QUOTE]
Ah deary me... You see, you misunderstand the meaning. "On the take", is the clue. Brian means that Paul goes for it when they try a take whereas Freddie wouldn't. Perfectly illustrated in the FM boxset.
So Rodgers has it the way he wants it, ready for the take. Rather than Freddie's process of trying a guide vocal and getting melodies and words/phrases ideas. It's just a different way of working.
So many people jump to their own conclusions with this stuff. Is it blind emotion? Seriously, where's the logic going?
Adam.
Ah deary me... You see, you misunderstand the meaning. "On the take", is the clue. Brian means that Paul goes for it when they try a take whereas Freddie wouldn't. Perfectly illustrated in the FM boxset.
So Rodgers has it the way he wants it, ready for the take. Rather than Freddie's process of trying a guide vocal and getting melodies and words/phrases ideas. It's just a different way of working.
So many people jump to their own conclusions with this stuff. Is it blind emotion? Seriously, where's the logic going?
Adam.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Adam Baboolal wrote: [/QUOTENAME]So many people jump to their own conclusions with this stuff. Is it blind emotion? Seriously, where's the logic going?[/QUOTE]
I knew it! You're secretly a Vulcan, aren't you! :D
V.
I knew it! You're secretly a Vulcan, aren't you! :D
V.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]bigV wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Adam Baboolal wrote: [/QUOTENAME]So many people jump to their own conclusions with this stuff. Is it blind emotion? Seriously, where's the logic going?[/QUOTE]
I knew it! You're secretly a Vulcan, aren't you! :D
V.
[/QUOTE]
..... secretly?? Didn't he used to write Live Long and Prosper at the bottom of his posts??
Oh wait.... that was "Peace, Adam".
Same thing.
I knew it! You're secretly a Vulcan, aren't you! :D
V.
[/QUOTE]
..... secretly?? Didn't he used to write Live Long and Prosper at the bottom of his posts??
Oh wait.... that was "Peace, Adam".
Same thing.
LMAO!! You guys crack me up. Thanks for that laugh. I seriously needed it after a bad rehearsal of WWRY last night. Let's just say myself and 2 others fell flat on their faces and "died" onstage. Ugh...
Cheers,
Adam.
Cheers,
Adam.
I was desperately hoping that this past year or so they would have been recording loads of stuff for a new single disc, some etxtra tracks for this release kept in the vaults, about a discs worth of material unrelated to the new l.p. to also be put into the vaults, and a discs worth of material for a follow up that could be a double c.d. set. All this time and they've recorded half of what today could be a c.d. I'm really saddened. I thought Roger Taylor said they were working on two c.d.s worth of material any way. He must be in another group.
8 songs is half of an one disc record? Well, there aren't that much of 16 track one disc albums that i know, if i exclud chillout/lounge compilations!
and remebering that they said the songs are "epics", this take us into another place: epic have AT Least 5 minutes and 30 sec. Or 6 plus minutes. So we an have 45-48 minutes of music already recorded, wich by standart means a regular time album. I think that they will write at least more 4-5 songs, wich means lots o stuff from our boys.
and remebering that they said the songs are "epics", this take us into another place: epic have AT Least 5 minutes and 30 sec. Or 6 plus minutes. So we an have 45-48 minutes of music already recorded, wich by standart means a regular time album. I think that they will write at least more 4-5 songs, wich means lots o stuff from our boys.