[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ginger01 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]It starts with wind and thunder (covered by audience noise) and at 30 seconds WWRY fast starts.
So the assumed lineage of my version would be
Master > DAT (1) > CDR (x) > WAV > FLAC?
Please confirm and I'll add it to the first post. Thanks for all your info!
[/QUOTE]
I'd rather say Master > DAT(x) > CDR(x)
You cannot be really sure that the DAT gens of both versions are identical. The less complete version may be from a different generation of the original Master > DAT transfer. Since DAT > DAT is (when done properly) a bit-perfect digital, and therefore lossless way of copying, you cannot tell if something is higher or lower gen by ear. DAT(0) may sound identical to DAT(10).
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Well, I was just going by what I was told when I first got the recording. I was told:
Master > DAT > DAT > CDR
Master > DAT > DAT > CDR
Thanks for all these clarifications! :)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Well, I was just going by what I was told when I first got the recording. I was told:
Master > DAT > DAT > CDR
[/QUOTE]
Ehm, I wasn't questioning that lineage, Bob. Obviously both versions are derived from the same original Analog Master > DAT transfer, but the less complete version may have been transfered to CDR from a differently gen'ed DAT than your copy.
Master > DAT > DAT > CDR
[/QUOTE]
Ehm, I wasn't questioning that lineage, Bob. Obviously both versions are derived from the same original Analog Master > DAT transfer, but the less complete version may have been transfered to CDR from a differently gen'ed DAT than your copy.
As always, thank you Ginger. YTB
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]tilomagnet wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Sir GH<br><h6>ah yeah</h6> wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Well, I was just going by what I was told when I first got the recording. I was told:
Master > DAT > DAT > CDR
[/QUOTE]
Ehm, I wasn't questioning that lineage, Bob. Obviously both versions are derived from the same original Analog Master > DAT transfer, but the less complete version may have been transfered to CDR from a differently gen'ed DAT than your copy.[/QUOTE]
Aha... indeed a possibility.
Dammit, why do you always have to make sense!??? ;)
Master > DAT > DAT > CDR
[/QUOTE]
Ehm, I wasn't questioning that lineage, Bob. Obviously both versions are derived from the same original Analog Master > DAT transfer, but the less complete version may have been transfered to CDR from a differently gen'ed DAT than your copy.[/QUOTE]
Aha... indeed a possibility.
Dammit, why do you always have to make sense!??? ;)
thanks ginger!
Many thanks, Ginger!
would somebody keep seedin'. thank you, thank you and thank you (-;
Can I ask you for seeding this show :)?
Any more seeders please?!?
I don't know why I miss this one last year. Can someone help me to fix that mistake?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]daffy_the_duck wrote: [/QUOTENAME]I don't know why I miss this one last year. Can someone help me to fix that mistake?[/QUOTE]
I know why I missed it: I was on holiday:-)
Thank you for sharing and the reseeding:-)
I know why I missed it: I was on holiday:-)
Thank you for sharing and the reseeding:-)
Always glad to help! Hope you complete soon (and please help seed for others!) :)
Uuuu, 0 seeds again :(, please help and seed!! :)