What torrent client do you use? I'm definitely seeding those shows and I have already uploaded several GB of data, but at the moment no peers are connected. I'll restart the torrents, maybe that will help.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
I use Bit Lord, i don't see any seeders
cheers
cheers
"It's so fast, because usually there are dozens of peers, not only a handful hit-and-runners like on Queenzone. You know why that is? Because they have a ratio policy – you have to upload at least 25% of the amount you download to be able to start further downloads. Here on QZ many leechers leave when they're finished and don't care about the community, just because they aren't forced to."
Actually, that's one of my pet peeves here. The amazing ingratitude of so many people who download and NEVER bother to share back. When I share a DVD of over 4 GB and only every 10th downloader helps seeding I am so frustrated that I think about stopping each time. I know that we lose many good sharers only because of these grabbers and runners. We have these amazingly kind people and tiredless sharers on QZ - it's a shame that there are so many leeches who never even reseed a torrent.
@ SebasMercury: have you tried uTorrent? It's free and easy and you get always a connection.
Actually, that's one of my pet peeves here. The amazing ingratitude of so many people who download and NEVER bother to share back. When I share a DVD of over 4 GB and only every 10th downloader helps seeding I am so frustrated that I think about stopping each time. I know that we lose many good sharers only because of these grabbers and runners. We have these amazingly kind people and tiredless sharers on QZ - it's a shame that there are so many leeches who never even reseed a torrent.
@ SebasMercury: have you tried uTorrent? It's free and easy and you get always a connection.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]YourValentine wrote: [/QUOTENAME]"It's so fast, because usually there are dozens of peers, not only a handful hit-and-runners like on Queenzone. You know why that is? Because they have a ratio policy – you have to upload at least 25% of the amount you download to be able to start further downloads. Here on QZ many leechers leave when they're finished and don't care about the community, just because they aren't forced to."
Actually, that's one of my pet peeves here. The amazing ingratitude of so many people who download and NEVER bother to share back. When I share a DVD of over 4 GB and only every 10th downloader helps seeding I am so frustrated that I think about stopping each time. I know that we lose many good sharers only because of these grabbers and runners. We have these amazingly kind people and tiredless sharers on QZ - it's a shame that there are so many leeches who never even reseed a torrent.
[/QUOTE]
Amen to that, I mean I dont leave a torrent for a long time, ( I only have about 10gigs of freespace and have to burn to clean room ) but I will make sure I do as much as I canexspecially considering what I just got from a great sharer. But again it happens, like on this torrent, when it was in early progress, there were 3 seeds and up to 34 peers, now there are only 21 peers and 5 total seeds. I guess thats life.
Actually, that's one of my pet peeves here. The amazing ingratitude of so many people who download and NEVER bother to share back. When I share a DVD of over 4 GB and only every 10th downloader helps seeding I am so frustrated that I think about stopping each time. I know that we lose many good sharers only because of these grabbers and runners. We have these amazingly kind people and tiredless sharers on QZ - it's a shame that there are so many leeches who never even reseed a torrent.
[/QUOTE]
Amen to that, I mean I dont leave a torrent for a long time, ( I only have about 10gigs of freespace and have to burn to clean room ) but I will make sure I do as much as I canexspecially considering what I just got from a great sharer. But again it happens, like on this torrent, when it was in early progress, there were 3 seeds and up to 34 peers, now there are only 21 peers and 5 total seeds. I guess thats life.
After talking so much about the technical side, what about discussing the musical aspects of the show?
Here's my opinion about this show, after listening to it twice:
I love the live killers era (imo, 1977 to 1981 saw the most powerful performances and the best setlists), but this particular show is definitely not the best. Freddie seems to struggle a bit through the first songs, especially "Now I'm Here" is very loose and lacks inspiration, it's definitely the worst interpretation of this song through the Live Killers tour (from the 7 or 8 shows I know). And the "rhythm group" doesn't have their best evening either. It's getting better towards the middle of the concert, especially "Spread Your Wings" is wonderful, and "Keep Yourself Alive" is one of the best versions I know. But BoRhap suffers again from Freddie's voice and timing problems. The audience is very enthusiastic, it seems, but it doesn't help much. I am often deceived by the sound quality – a perfect sounding show always seems to be a better performance – but in this case I doubt that an excellent sound would save the show.
This is my own personal opinion, if somebody likes to tear it apart (or contribute in any other way), please do so ;-)
Here's my opinion about this show, after listening to it twice:
I love the live killers era (imo, 1977 to 1981 saw the most powerful performances and the best setlists), but this particular show is definitely not the best. Freddie seems to struggle a bit through the first songs, especially "Now I'm Here" is very loose and lacks inspiration, it's definitely the worst interpretation of this song through the Live Killers tour (from the 7 or 8 shows I know). And the "rhythm group" doesn't have their best evening either. It's getting better towards the middle of the concert, especially "Spread Your Wings" is wonderful, and "Keep Yourself Alive" is one of the best versions I know. But BoRhap suffers again from Freddie's voice and timing problems. The audience is very enthusiastic, it seems, but it doesn't help much. I am often deceived by the sound quality – a perfect sounding show always seems to be a better performance – but in this case I doubt that an excellent sound would save the show.
This is my own personal opinion, if somebody likes to tear it apart (or contribute in any other way), please do so ;-)
Frequency analys looks realy bad :( Maybe it's a some error from tape transfer ? Please can someone check this.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Nummer2 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]After talking so much about the technical side, what about discussing the musical aspects of the show?
Here's my opinion about this show, after listening to it twice:
I love the live killers era (imo, 1977 to 1981 saw the most powerful performances and the best setlists), but this particular show is definitely not the best. Freddie seems to struggle a bit through the first songs, especially "Now I'm Here" is very loose and lacks inspiration, it's definitely the worst interpretation of this song through the Live Killers tour (from the 7 or 8 shows I know). And the "rhythm group" doesn't have their best evening either. It's getting better towards the middle of the concert, especially "Spread Your Wings" is wonderful, and "Keep Yourself Alive" is one of the best versions I know. But BoRhap suffers again from Freddie's voice and timing problems. The audience is very enthusiastic, it seems, but it doesn't help much. I am often deceived by the sound quality – a perfect sounding show always seems to be a better performance – but in this case I doubt that an excellent sound would save the show.
This is my own personal opinion, if somebody likes to tear it apart (or contribute in any other way), please do so ;-)[/QUOTE]
I can't add much more than that. It was an up and down show for the boys. But I actually like the version of NIH, as they do the vocal thing with the audience to tempo twice. Very unexpected!
Here's my opinion about this show, after listening to it twice:
I love the live killers era (imo, 1977 to 1981 saw the most powerful performances and the best setlists), but this particular show is definitely not the best. Freddie seems to struggle a bit through the first songs, especially "Now I'm Here" is very loose and lacks inspiration, it's definitely the worst interpretation of this song through the Live Killers tour (from the 7 or 8 shows I know). And the "rhythm group" doesn't have their best evening either. It's getting better towards the middle of the concert, especially "Spread Your Wings" is wonderful, and "Keep Yourself Alive" is one of the best versions I know. But BoRhap suffers again from Freddie's voice and timing problems. The audience is very enthusiastic, it seems, but it doesn't help much. I am often deceived by the sound quality – a perfect sounding show always seems to be a better performance – but in this case I doubt that an excellent sound would save the show.
This is my own personal opinion, if somebody likes to tear it apart (or contribute in any other way), please do so ;-)[/QUOTE]
I can't add much more than that. It was an up and down show for the boys. But I actually like the version of NIH, as they do the vocal thing with the audience to tempo twice. Very unexpected!
Thnx for sharing this! I'm seeding now
Btw. Can u reseed Berlin 86, Kassel 82 and Leeds 82? there ain't any seeders or peers
cheers
Btw. Can u reseed Berlin 86, Kassel 82 and Leeds 82? there ain't any seeders or peers
cheers
Thanks for sharing.
Take care
Take care
Actually I'm seeding Kassel 82 and Berlin 86. No idea why I don't upload anything at the moment (I did at some time, but not now). May be it's because I'm firewalled. But if you use µtorrent, it should work!
I'm also seeding Sapporo and Berlin 79. The Berlin 79 torrent is uploading and connected to 3 peers, 2x µtorrent, 1x Mainline.
I'll never understand this torrent thing ...
I'm also seeding Sapporo and Berlin 79. The Berlin 79 torrent is uploading and connected to 3 peers, 2x µtorrent, 1x Mainline.
I'll never understand this torrent thing ...