A new torrent has been uploaded to DIME.
Torrent: 146377
Title: Queen | 1979.02.11 Munich, Germany (Incomplete Soundboard Recording)
Size: 136.67 MB
Category: Rock
Uploaded by: duckwalk
Info hash: fdaa07b5124f971ae9dac4168e4d3ce593dff41b
Description
----------------------------------------------------------
Queen
1979.02.11 Basketball Halle, Munich, Germany
German TV Broadcast > VHS > DVD > WAV > FLAC [Level 8]
Disc 1:
01. Let Me Entertain You
02. Now I'm Here
03. Bohemian Rhapsody
04. Sheer Heart Attack
05. We Will Rock You
06. We Are The Champions
07. God Save The Queen
Visit QueenZone.com
----------------------------------------------------------
You can use the URL below to download the torrent (you may have to login).
http://www.dimeadozen.org/torrents-details.php?id=146377&hit=1
Take care!
dimeadozen.org
Thread
Posts in chronological order
This has been banned because of the compressed DVD audio. Oh my, the folks at DIME are strict, aren't they? But this show should be still active on Queenzone.
Dime's policy is strict? Lol! You can upload any junk there.
Oh yes? Try uploading a torrent without info file or checksum. Or with the wrong data format in the torrent name. Or the audience source of an officially released show. Or one of the shows from the EMI "Top 100 bootlegs" series. Or a torrent that's similar to a previously shared torrent, even if that's inactive. Or lossy files even if there are no lossless versions available.
Maybe they didn't care before, but since I started to use DIME (about 6 months ago) they behave like watchdogs. Which isn't necessarily bad, some things could help improve Queenzone. Things like share ratio or exact lineages.
Maybe they didn't care before, but since I started to use DIME (about 6 months ago) they behave like watchdogs. Which isn't necessarily bad, some things could help improve Queenzone. Things like share ratio or exact lineages.
this share is worthless, more or less. Everybody has the video, meanwhile..., or am I mixing up a date?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Nummer2 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Oh yes? Try uploading a torrent without info file or checksum. Or with the wrong data format in the torrent name. Or the audience source of an officially released show. Or one of the shows from the EMI "Top 100 bootlegs" series. Or a torrent that's similar to a previously shared torrent, even if that's inactive. Or lossy files even if there are no lossless versions available.[/QUOTE]
There's a reason why checksums should be included with shows in shn or FLAC format. If you torrent a show that hundreds of people download and may distribute further then you can at least expect the seeder to prepare the seed as good as possible, can't you? I don't see anything wrong with this policy.
Aside from that you can still upload shows on dime that have a lineage like 'AUD > ? > CDR > FLAC', even for shows that were taped a few years ago.
Basically, any show that doesn't have lineage information of what the recording went through before it was circulated on CD (i.e. for older shows the analog gens, for more recent shows the medium the show was mastered on) has no trading value at all, because there is no proof that it's indeed the best currently available copy. Why should I trade for an undocumented show that may be easily available in better quality?
Yeah, I know it's kind of useless to post these things on a Queen board, but I think a few people have realized that the quality standards in the Queen trading scene are as low as they can be, though it seems to be getting a bit better lately.
There are lots of torrent sites that have a far more strict policy than dime.
There's a reason why checksums should be included with shows in shn or FLAC format. If you torrent a show that hundreds of people download and may distribute further then you can at least expect the seeder to prepare the seed as good as possible, can't you? I don't see anything wrong with this policy.
Aside from that you can still upload shows on dime that have a lineage like 'AUD > ? > CDR > FLAC', even for shows that were taped a few years ago.
Basically, any show that doesn't have lineage information of what the recording went through before it was circulated on CD (i.e. for older shows the analog gens, for more recent shows the medium the show was mastered on) has no trading value at all, because there is no proof that it's indeed the best currently available copy. Why should I trade for an undocumented show that may be easily available in better quality?
Yeah, I know it's kind of useless to post these things on a Queen board, but I think a few people have realized that the quality standards in the Queen trading scene are as low as they can be, though it seems to be getting a bit better lately.
There are lots of torrent sites that have a far more strict policy than dime.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]frank39 wrote: [/QUOTENAME]this share is worthless, more or less. Everybody has the video, meanwhile..., or am I mixing up a date?[/QUOTE]
No, you're not... but most people don't have it in this quality, even if it's seen as lossy by the most critical of us.
No, you're not... but most people don't have it in this quality, even if it's seen as lossy by the most critical of us.
Thanks, if its a question of upgrade, always welcome, of course, but honestly, I´d prefer the DVD as a whole, and I really hope you find the time to share it.
The widely spread video version is partly async.btw...
The widely spread video version is partly async.btw...
@tilomagnet: I don't know if you misunderstood me, I'm 100% your opinion.
@frank39: I love to listen to Queen concerts on my way to and from work in my car. So I appreciate sharing the audio files of videos.
@frank39: I love to listen to Queen concerts on my way to and from work in my car. So I appreciate sharing the audio files of videos.