[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: [/QUOTENAME]this sheep got owned in the other thread. lol![/QUOTE]
seems YOU are the sheep who got owned by ME haha
Thread
Posts in chronological order
^uh... no. sucker.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Oh, and one more thing! This is just my advice, but perhaps you could experiment more with chord progressions. Your music just sounds a tad predictable...how about some deceptive cadences or have some more noticable half cadences? Just a suggestion, take it or leave it.[/QUOTE]
He doesn't even understand the words you're using, let alone what you mean by them in the context of a song. And seeing how he's both too arrogant and too stupid to take lessons...
As for the song: you make a few mistakes playing (rhythm-related: 3 faulty tones: see the following), however, what is far worse is that you were too lazy to set your audio properly, which has caused all your notes to stick together in a dull, monotonous blur. You are doing nothing more than a very simple toccata (look it up on wikipedia if you don't know what I mean) by the sounds of it, so you should consider doing something more interesting with your chords. Also, you should start realizing that "more notes" does not equal "better song". In your case, the downpour of notes ruins an acceptable concept, in fact.
He doesn't even understand the words you're using, let alone what you mean by them in the context of a song. And seeing how he's both too arrogant and too stupid to take lessons...
As for the song: you make a few mistakes playing (rhythm-related: 3 faulty tones: see the following), however, what is far worse is that you were too lazy to set your audio properly, which has caused all your notes to stick together in a dull, monotonous blur. You are doing nothing more than a very simple toccata (look it up on wikipedia if you don't know what I mean) by the sounds of it, so you should consider doing something more interesting with your chords. Also, you should start realizing that "more notes" does not equal "better song". In your case, the downpour of notes ruins an acceptable concept, in fact.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: [/QUOTENAME]this sheep got owned in the other thread. lol![/QUOTE]
seems YOU are the sheep who got owned by ME haha[/QUOTE]
Only in your most delirious fantasies, I'm glad to say. The day a homo sapiens loses a battle of the wits with a half-wit cow like you, is the day the universe ends. It'll implode from the sheer weight of the zeros preceding that final one in the odds of that occurring.
seems YOU are the sheep who got owned by ME haha[/QUOTE]
Only in your most delirious fantasies, I'm glad to say. The day a homo sapiens loses a battle of the wits with a half-wit cow like you, is the day the universe ends. It'll implode from the sheer weight of the zeros preceding that final one in the odds of that occurring.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Oh, and one more thing! This is just my advice, but perhaps you could experiment more with chord progressions. Your music just sounds a tad predictable...how about some deceptive cadences or have some more noticable half cadences? Just a suggestion, take it or leave it.[/QUOTE]
He doesn't even understand the words you're using, let alone what you mean by them in the context of a song. And seeing how he's both too arrogant and too stupid to take lessons...
As for the song: you make a few mistakes playing (rhythm-related: 3 faulty tones: see the following), however, what is far worse is that you were too lazy to set your audio properly, which has caused all your notes to stick together in a dull, monotonous blur. You are doing nothing more than a very simple toccata (look it up on wikipedia if you don't know what I mean) by the sounds of it, so you should consider doing something more interesting with your chords. Also, you should start realizing that "more notes" does not equal "better song". In your case, the downpour of notes ruins an acceptable concept, in fact.[/QUOTE]
spare me the techniqal music bullshit, i judge by ear and it sounds great to me. I want to see you write something like this.
He doesn't even understand the words you're using, let alone what you mean by them in the context of a song. And seeing how he's both too arrogant and too stupid to take lessons...
As for the song: you make a few mistakes playing (rhythm-related: 3 faulty tones: see the following), however, what is far worse is that you were too lazy to set your audio properly, which has caused all your notes to stick together in a dull, monotonous blur. You are doing nothing more than a very simple toccata (look it up on wikipedia if you don't know what I mean) by the sounds of it, so you should consider doing something more interesting with your chords. Also, you should start realizing that "more notes" does not equal "better song". In your case, the downpour of notes ruins an acceptable concept, in fact.[/QUOTE]
spare me the techniqal music bullshit, i judge by ear and it sounds great to me. I want to see you write something like this.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color=FF0033 face=symbol>Freddie wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Oh, and one more thing! This is just my advice, but perhaps you could experiment more with chord progressions. Your music just sounds a tad predictable...how about some deceptive cadences or have some more noticable half cadences? Just a suggestion, take it or leave it.[/QUOTE]
He doesn't even understand the words you're using, let alone what you mean by them in the context of a song. And seeing how he's both too arrogant and too stupid to take lessons...
As for the song: you make a few mistakes playing (rhythm-related: 3 faulty tones: see the following), however, what is far worse is that you were too lazy to set your audio properly, which has caused all your notes to stick together in a dull, monotonous blur. You are doing nothing more than a very simple toccata (look it up on wikipedia if you don't know what I mean) by the sounds of it, so you should consider doing something more interesting with your chords. Also, you should start realizing that "more notes" does not equal "better song". In your case, the downpour of notes ruins an acceptable concept, in fact.[/QUOTE]
spare me the techniqal music bullshit, i judge by ear and it sounds great to me. I want to see you write something like this.[/QUOTE]
I won't. I like sticking to music that is actually good.
He doesn't even understand the words you're using, let alone what you mean by them in the context of a song. And seeing how he's both too arrogant and too stupid to take lessons...
As for the song: you make a few mistakes playing (rhythm-related: 3 faulty tones: see the following), however, what is far worse is that you were too lazy to set your audio properly, which has caused all your notes to stick together in a dull, monotonous blur. You are doing nothing more than a very simple toccata (look it up on wikipedia if you don't know what I mean) by the sounds of it, so you should consider doing something more interesting with your chords. Also, you should start realizing that "more notes" does not equal "better song". In your case, the downpour of notes ruins an acceptable concept, in fact.[/QUOTE]
spare me the techniqal music bullshit, i judge by ear and it sounds great to me. I want to see you write something like this.[/QUOTE]
I won't. I like sticking to music that is actually good.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: [/QUOTENAME]this sheep got owned in the other thread. lol![/QUOTE]
seems YOU are the sheep who got owned by ME haha[/QUOTE]
Only in your most delirious fantasies, I'm glad to say. The day a homo sapiens loses a battle of the wits with a half-wit cow like you, is the day the universe ends. It'll implode from the sheer weight of the zeros preceding that final one in the odds of that occurring. [/QUOTE]
*high fives TQ, although he might not high five back*
seems YOU are the sheep who got owned by ME haha[/QUOTE]
Only in your most delirious fantasies, I'm glad to say. The day a homo sapiens loses a battle of the wits with a half-wit cow like you, is the day the universe ends. It'll implode from the sheer weight of the zeros preceding that final one in the odds of that occurring. [/QUOTE]
*high fives TQ, although he might not high five back*
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]nothing more than a very simple toccata
[/QUOTE]
Sounds lovely, but I'm allergic to garlic.
[/QUOTE]
Sounds lovely, but I'm allergic to garlic.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Atheist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: [/QUOTENAME]this sheep got owned in the other thread. lol![/QUOTE]
seems YOU are the sheep who got owned by ME haha[/QUOTE]
Only in your most delirious fantasies, I'm glad to say. The day a homo sapiens loses a battle of the wits with a half-wit cow like you, is the day the universe ends. It'll implode from the sheer weight of the zeros preceding that final one in the odds of that occurring. [/QUOTE]
*high fives TQ, although he might not high five back*[/QUOTE]
*high fives back after a suspiciously long absence of as much as a day* :P
seems YOU are the sheep who got owned by ME haha[/QUOTE]
Only in your most delirious fantasies, I'm glad to say. The day a homo sapiens loses a battle of the wits with a half-wit cow like you, is the day the universe ends. It'll implode from the sheer weight of the zeros preceding that final one in the odds of that occurring. [/QUOTE]
*high fives TQ, although he might not high five back*[/QUOTE]
*high fives back after a suspiciously long absence of as much as a day* :P
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]nothing more than a very simple toccata
[/QUOTE]
Sounds lovely, but I'm allergic to garlic.[/QUOTE]
No prob, I'll make you a garlic-free one in Eb minor.
You don't know what you're missing, though. The garlic really adds a wonderful touch.
[/QUOTE]
Sounds lovely, but I'm allergic to garlic.[/QUOTE]
No prob, I'll make you a garlic-free one in Eb minor.
You don't know what you're missing, though. The garlic really adds a wonderful touch.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<b><font color = "crimson"> ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Zebonka12 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]&lt;b&gt;&lt;font color = &quot;crimson&quot;&gt; ThomasQuinn wrote: [/QUOTENAME]nothing more than a very simple toccata
[/QUOTE]
Sounds lovely, but I'm allergic to garlic.[/QUOTE]
No prob, I'll make you a garlic-free one in Eb minor.
You don't know what you're missing, though. The garlic really adds a wonderful touch.[/QUOTE]
Hehe. I really piss off the musicians I run into... I was trying to describe something I'd been listening to, and the guy says "Satriani?" and I responded "No thanks, I'm vegetarian".
I'm alienating everyone. I'm sure of it....
[/QUOTE]
Sounds lovely, but I'm allergic to garlic.[/QUOTE]
No prob, I'll make you a garlic-free one in Eb minor.
You don't know what you're missing, though. The garlic really adds a wonderful touch.[/QUOTE]
Hehe. I really piss off the musicians I run into... I was trying to describe something I'd been listening to, and the guy says "Satriani?" and I responded "No thanks, I'm vegetarian".
I'm alienating everyone. I'm sure of it....
so TQ agreeing with me means...
intelligent QZers - 2
sheep man - 0
best of 7, maybe? ;)
intelligent QZers - 2
sheep man - 0
best of 7, maybe? ;)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]<font color="ffa500"><b> chickenlicious! wrote: [/QUOTENAME]so TQ agreeing with me means...
intelligent QZers - 2
sheep man - 0
best of 7, maybe? ;)[/QUOTE]
you calling me sheep you fucking idiot? lol
if something all of you are its sheep
and YOU got owned in the other thread by ME :D
intelligent QZers - 2
sheep man - 0
best of 7, maybe? ;)[/QUOTE]
you calling me sheep you fucking idiot? lol
if something all of you are its sheep
and YOU got owned in the other thread by ME :D
uh, no. sheep man.
i'm not thinking of sheep. you are. you call everyone sheep.
i'm not thinking of sheep. you are. you call everyone sheep.
I think that silly remark just cost him a point, for re-re-repeating the same flawed attempt at securing a snide remark for his side.
So that brings the current score to:
IQs over 100: 2
IQs under 10: -1
So that brings the current score to:
IQs over 100: 2
IQs under 10: -1