Please keep this one running! I´m on 91%, Soo close. Thanks for a great torrent.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Many thanks!! This looks fantastic!
i don't like so much that version:
-too much colour intensity (old version tha i have is way better)
-too much hiss reduction (is well known that a little bit of noise MUST remain) and a part of audio was lost. ( you ca hear a noisy metallic sound in the background)
- what i will do with ac3 audio? the original source was stereo or mono. so came from where the 5.1 audio tracks ? unuseful...
- video is 720*576 at 8000. VHS source (that source...) is at best 352*576 at 5000. we don't need 2 DVDs than so high UNUSEFUL quality
tht work was done by a guy that don't know much about audio-video editing (IMHO).
in any case i will say thank you to him and the guys that share this work with others.
My opinion.
thank you
-too much colour intensity (old version tha i have is way better)
-too much hiss reduction (is well known that a little bit of noise MUST remain) and a part of audio was lost. ( you ca hear a noisy metallic sound in the background)
- what i will do with ac3 audio? the original source was stereo or mono. so came from where the 5.1 audio tracks ? unuseful...
- video is 720*576 at 8000. VHS source (that source...) is at best 352*576 at 5000. we don't need 2 DVDs than so high UNUSEFUL quality
tht work was done by a guy that don't know much about audio-video editing (IMHO).
in any case i will say thank you to him and the guys that share this work with others.
My opinion.
thank you
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Rado wrote: [/QUOTENAME]i don't like so much that version:
-too much colour intensity (old version tha i have is way better)
-too much hiss reduction (is well known that a little bit of noise MUST remain) and a part of audio was lost. ( you ca hear a noisy metallic sound in the background)
- what i will do with ac3 audio? the original source was stereo or mono. so came from where the 5.1 audio tracks ? unuseful...
- video is 720*576 at 8000. VHS source (that source...) is at best 352*576 at 5000. we don't need 2 DVDs than so high UNUSEFUL quality
tht work was done by a guy that don't know much about audio-video editing (IMHO).
in any case i will say thank you to him and the guys that share this work with others.
My opinion.
thank you[/QUOTE]
I agree with some of your remarks.
- the colours are weird, too bright and too saturated, just compare this version of Death on two legs with the excerpts from the master tape which you can see on the A Night At The Opera anniversary DVD.
- too much hiss reduction - yes, I agree the version shared on thetradersden had much more details, BUT personally I prefer THIS video
- the audio is TERRIBLE. He simply cut some frequency range and encoded it into shitty ac3 format.
- the original audio (taken from the video feed) was of course mono (we're talking about 1977). I also don't think it was necessary to upmix it to 5.1 but please don't forget that some people like to listen to music on their 5.1 system. I personally prefer stereo on music, I mean it's not Star Wars or something.
- Why do you think that 720x576 video encoded at 8Mbps is bad ???? Sure, VHS resolution is smaller, but Lanczos4Resize can do miracles, did you ever try it ? And can you imagine how bad could this look with 5MBps bit rate ?
And I wouldn't dare to say that Snivlle doesn't know much about audio-video editing, I actually like his remasters.
-too much colour intensity (old version tha i have is way better)
-too much hiss reduction (is well known that a little bit of noise MUST remain) and a part of audio was lost. ( you ca hear a noisy metallic sound in the background)
- what i will do with ac3 audio? the original source was stereo or mono. so came from where the 5.1 audio tracks ? unuseful...
- video is 720*576 at 8000. VHS source (that source...) is at best 352*576 at 5000. we don't need 2 DVDs than so high UNUSEFUL quality
tht work was done by a guy that don't know much about audio-video editing (IMHO).
in any case i will say thank you to him and the guys that share this work with others.
My opinion.
thank you[/QUOTE]
I agree with some of your remarks.
- the colours are weird, too bright and too saturated, just compare this version of Death on two legs with the excerpts from the master tape which you can see on the A Night At The Opera anniversary DVD.
- too much hiss reduction - yes, I agree the version shared on thetradersden had much more details, BUT personally I prefer THIS video
- the audio is TERRIBLE. He simply cut some frequency range and encoded it into shitty ac3 format.
- the original audio (taken from the video feed) was of course mono (we're talking about 1977). I also don't think it was necessary to upmix it to 5.1 but please don't forget that some people like to listen to music on their 5.1 system. I personally prefer stereo on music, I mean it's not Star Wars or something.
- Why do you think that 720x576 video encoded at 8Mbps is bad ???? Sure, VHS resolution is smaller, but Lanczos4Resize can do miracles, did you ever try it ? And can you imagine how bad could this look with 5MBps bit rate ?
And I wouldn't dare to say that Snivlle doesn't know much about audio-video editing, I actually like his remasters.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]pittrek wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Rado wrote: [/QUOTENAME]i don't like so much that version:
- Why do you think that 720x576 video encoded at 8Mbps is bad ???? Sure, VHS resolution is smaller, but Lanczos4Resize can do miracles, did you ever try it ? And can you imagine how bad could this look with 5MBps bit rate ?
And I wouldn't dare that Snivlle doesn't know much about audio-video editing, I actually like his remasters.[/QUOTE]
unfortunately you can't rebuild what is lost forever (or don't exist)
it is like converting an 128Kb mp3 audio at 320Kb
i dont' know Lanczos4Resize, but i'm sure it apply artifacts.
well how good ANY software can be, none can do miracles.
i say thank you to Snivlle, but with a little more tecnical knowledge he can did a better job.
bye
- Why do you think that 720x576 video encoded at 8Mbps is bad ???? Sure, VHS resolution is smaller, but Lanczos4Resize can do miracles, did you ever try it ? And can you imagine how bad could this look with 5MBps bit rate ?
And I wouldn't dare that Snivlle doesn't know much about audio-video editing, I actually like his remasters.[/QUOTE]
unfortunately you can't rebuild what is lost forever (or don't exist)
it is like converting an 128Kb mp3 audio at 320Kb
i dont' know Lanczos4Resize, but i'm sure it apply artifacts.
well how good ANY software can be, none can do miracles.
i say thank you to Snivlle, but with a little more tecnical knowledge he can did a better job.
bye
VHS is always in 240 lines so nothing was lost passe in the remaster.
However,the remastering was average at best IMO and is a double re-encode the way it was done.So yes its lossy.
Now the image cascades & the lights are now un-genuine.
They wouldnt be pin spots...lights spray.There is too much black & high contrast to make you focus on the centre image(whats happening)rather than the full overal picture.THIS is what is making you think it is better.It is,infact losing the original picture images as well as what "was" in the background.
As for the audio...pointless 5.1 conversion with the same audio feed sources as its not 5.1.
Clicking your Pro-logic button would of been a better way and more believable.
It does sound cleaner....but only because frequencies have been lost.
Lastly for knowledge on video & audio.
Cascading image says he is not knowledgeable on video..you don't do that....ever..thats for 70's animation flicks, & making 5.1 from the same source directions tells me he's just a hobbiest for personal use and shares in text what he reads in forums rather than know how...nowt wrong with that apart from misleading with the words to product.
Shame its lossy & the wrong way to do it....but there is keenness,so lets see if lessons are learnt from mistakes.
Logo was good though......lol
4.5/10
However,the remastering was average at best IMO and is a double re-encode the way it was done.So yes its lossy.
Now the image cascades & the lights are now un-genuine.
They wouldnt be pin spots...lights spray.There is too much black & high contrast to make you focus on the centre image(whats happening)rather than the full overal picture.THIS is what is making you think it is better.It is,infact losing the original picture images as well as what "was" in the background.
As for the audio...pointless 5.1 conversion with the same audio feed sources as its not 5.1.
Clicking your Pro-logic button would of been a better way and more believable.
It does sound cleaner....but only because frequencies have been lost.
Lastly for knowledge on video & audio.
Cascading image says he is not knowledgeable on video..you don't do that....ever..thats for 70's animation flicks, & making 5.1 from the same source directions tells me he's just a hobbiest for personal use and shares in text what he reads in forums rather than know how...nowt wrong with that apart from misleading with the words to product.
Shame its lossy & the wrong way to do it....but there is keenness,so lets see if lessons are learnt from mistakes.
Logo was good though......lol
4.5/10
Yes, I love that dinosaur :)
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]The TooN wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
Are there others DVD from Snivlle ?
[/QUOTE]
If you're into Black Sabbath, be shure to get his remaster of the famous Paris 1970 show.
It's the best version I ever saw, amazing sound+picture compared to the other common versions. Strange It didn't worked out well on Earl's Court, but he really set a milestone on that DVD Get it at trader's den!
Are there others DVD from Snivlle ?
[/QUOTE]
If you're into Black Sabbath, be shure to get his remaster of the famous Paris 1970 show.
It's the best version I ever saw, amazing sound+picture compared to the other common versions. Strange It didn't worked out well on Earl's Court, but he really set a milestone on that DVD Get it at trader's den!
HU, i´ve just finished the download of this dvd but now i cant copy to a dvd...i use dvdshrink and clonedvd but both says that videots_ifo it´s missing:S how can i pass this to a dvd? tanks;) (sorry my english but i´m portuguese...if there's anything you dont understand just say to me)
Heh ? Video_ts.ifo WAS there. Are you sure you have downloaded everything ?
yes...i´m sure...i downloaded all the files.
forget it.my mistake...i just can burn it now..i was opening the wrong paste=s lol. thanks anyway;)
HI, i downloaded it, and is great!!!
I'm having a problem.. i can see it perfect in my computer but in my tv, it's not working.. anybody know anything about it??
And i have a question too, i downloaded everything and is the disk 1, what about the disk 2? where can i find it?
Thank you...
I'm having a problem.. i can see it perfect in my computer but in my tv, it's not working.. anybody know anything about it??
And i have a question too, i downloaded everything and is the disk 1, what about the disk 2? where can i find it?
Thank you...
Good point, where's disc 2?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]bohemianmoomin wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Good point, where's disc 2?[/QUOTE]
Try here:
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=1039804
Try here:
http://www.queenzone.com/queenzone/forumnew/forum_topic_view.aspx?Q=1039804