[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Not a bad idea in trying to get Queen another "well deserved #1" but I think instead of people wasting 99p on a past track. why don't you all wait for the next single from "The Cosmos Rocks" to be released. Go & buy the CD from your local record store & also spend the 99p on the download"
I think most people can spare 99p.
Since Freddie, "Queen + Paul Rodgers" seem to get overlooked on the radio stations, hence the non-chart position of "Say It's Not True" I know most people downloaded this track for Free & the downloads didn't count towards the chart, but the track, was, a bloody good track & should have charted.
Apart from the Die Hard fans of Queen & the Die Hard fans of Paul, most general people won't buy the single unless they here it on the radio.
Save your money, on a past track, spend it on the new release. let's get some airplay.
I think most people can spare 99p.
Since Freddie, "Queen + Paul Rodgers" seem to get overlooked on the radio stations, hence the non-chart position of "Say It's Not True" I know most people downloaded this track for Free & the downloads didn't count towards the chart, but the track, was, a bloody good track & should have charted.
Apart from the Die Hard fans of Queen & the Die Hard fans of Paul, most general people won't buy the single unless they here it on the radio.
Save your money, on a past track, spend it on the new release. let's get some airplay.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]A Word In Your Ear wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Not a bad idea in trying to get Queen another "well deserved #1" but I think instead of people wasting 99p on a past track. why don't you all wait for the next single from "The Cosmos Rocks" to be released. Go & buy the CD from your local record store & also spend the 99p on the download"
I think most people can spare 99p.
Since Freddie, "Queen + Paul Rodgers" seem to get overlooked on the radio stations, hence the non-chart position of "Say It's Not True" I know most people downloaded this track for Free & the downloads didn't count towards the chart, but the track, was, a bloody good track & should have charted.
Apart from the Die Hard fans of Queen & the Die Hard fans of Paul, most general people won't buy the single unless they here it on the radio.
Save your money, on a past track, spend it on the new release. let's get some airplay. [/QUOTE]
QPR!! No thanks. I like my Queen neat, with no artificial additives.
I think most people can spare 99p.
Since Freddie, "Queen + Paul Rodgers" seem to get overlooked on the radio stations, hence the non-chart position of "Say It's Not True" I know most people downloaded this track for Free & the downloads didn't count towards the chart, but the track, was, a bloody good track & should have charted.
Apart from the Die Hard fans of Queen & the Die Hard fans of Paul, most general people won't buy the single unless they here it on the radio.
Save your money, on a past track, spend it on the new release. let's get some airplay. [/QUOTE]
QPR!! No thanks. I like my Queen neat, with no artificial additives.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fairydandy wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]A Word In Your Ear wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Not a bad idea in trying to get Queen another "well deserved #1" but I think instead of people wasting 99p on a past track. why don't you all wait for the next single from "The Cosmos Rocks" to be released. Go & buy the CD from your local record store & also spend the 99p on the download"
I think most people can spare 99p.
Since Freddie, "Queen + Paul Rodgers" seem to get overlooked on the radio stations, hence the non-chart position of "Say It's Not True" I know most people downloaded this track for Free & the downloads didn't count towards the chart, but the track, was, a bloody good track & should have charted.
Apart from the Die Hard fans of Queen & the Die Hard fans of Paul, most general people won't buy the single unless they here it on the radio.
Save your money, on a past track, spend it on the new release. let's get some airplay. [/QUOTE]
QPR!! No thanks. I like my Queen neat, with no artificial additives.[/QUOTE]
You must hate all their live shows from 1982 onwards then.
I think most people can spare 99p.
Since Freddie, "Queen + Paul Rodgers" seem to get overlooked on the radio stations, hence the non-chart position of "Say It's Not True" I know most people downloaded this track for Free & the downloads didn't count towards the chart, but the track, was, a bloody good track & should have charted.
Apart from the Die Hard fans of Queen & the Die Hard fans of Paul, most general people won't buy the single unless they here it on the radio.
Save your money, on a past track, spend it on the new release. let's get some airplay. [/QUOTE]
QPR!! No thanks. I like my Queen neat, with no artificial additives.[/QUOTE]
You must hate all their live shows from 1982 onwards then.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fairydandy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Ok, so it's a bit of a long shot, but what have we to lose, apart from 99p?
http://queenforum.parlophone.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=45800
Anyone in?[/QUOTE]
Why would you want to put an old song in the charts? Nobody with a real interest in music has any reason to look at chart positions, I think it would be better if you donated your 99p to charity and not on some pointless exercise in fan worship.
http://queenforum.parlophone.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=45800
Anyone in?[/QUOTE]
Why would you want to put an old song in the charts? Nobody with a real interest in music has any reason to look at chart positions, I think it would be better if you donated your 99p to charity and not on some pointless exercise in fan worship.
The motivation comes from trying to understand what motivates people like you.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]inu-liger wrote: [/QUOTENAME]No wonder QOL'ers are made fun of so much here. You guys are really idiotic.[/QUOTE]
And of course QZ'ers are equally despised on other message boards.
Does that mean this place is more intelligent or better in any other way? I don't think so.
QOL might have more of the new and enthusiastic fans who have been drawn in by the website address on the latest releases, but almost everyone ends up bitter and negative in a few years regardless of which site they post on. It's only natural with the kind of quality control QP has. ;)
Is QZ the kind of place where I want to spend my free time? Hell no! :P
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Holly2003 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fairydandy wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]A Word In Your Ear wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Not a bad idea in trying to get Queen another "well deserved #1" but I think instead of people wasting 99p on a past track. why don't you all wait for the next single from "The Cosmos Rocks" to be released. Go & buy the CD from your local record store & also spend the 99p on the download"
I think most people can spare 99p.
Since Freddie, "Queen + Paul Rodgers" seem to get overlooked on the radio stations, hence the non-chart position of "Say It's Not True" I know most people downloaded this track for Free & the downloads didn't count towards the chart, but the track, was, a bloody good track & should have charted.
Apart from the Die Hard fans of Queen & the Die Hard fans of Paul, most general people won't buy the single unless they here it on the radio.
Save your money, on a past track, spend it on the new release. let's get some airplay. [/QUOTE]
QPR!! No thanks. I like my Queen neat, with no artificial additives.[/QUOTE]
You must hate all their live shows from 1982 onwards then.[/QUOTE]
My, my aren't you clever. I'm learning so much from you.
I think most people can spare 99p.
Since Freddie, "Queen + Paul Rodgers" seem to get overlooked on the radio stations, hence the non-chart position of "Say It's Not True" I know most people downloaded this track for Free & the downloads didn't count towards the chart, but the track, was, a bloody good track & should have charted.
Apart from the Die Hard fans of Queen & the Die Hard fans of Paul, most general people won't buy the single unless they here it on the radio.
Save your money, on a past track, spend it on the new release. let's get some airplay. [/QUOTE]
QPR!! No thanks. I like my Queen neat, with no artificial additives.[/QUOTE]
You must hate all their live shows from 1982 onwards then.[/QUOTE]
My, my aren't you clever. I'm learning so much from you.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]paulsmith2001 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fairydandy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Ok, so it's a bit of a long shot, but what have we to lose, apart from 99p?
http://queenforum.parlophone.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=45800
Anyone in?[/QUOTE]
Why would you want to put an old song in the charts? Nobody with a real interest in music has any reason to look at chart positions, I think it would be better if you donated your 99p to charity and not on some pointless exercise in fan worship. [/QUOTE]
Why would anyone post on a website dedicated to a band that has been dead since 1991? Why don't we all just log off and forget it?
Fan worship? Me? Are you some kind of a prat? No answers necessary.
http://queenforum.parlophone.co.uk/viewtopic.php?t=45800
Anyone in?[/QUOTE]
Why would you want to put an old song in the charts? Nobody with a real interest in music has any reason to look at chart positions, I think it would be better if you donated your 99p to charity and not on some pointless exercise in fan worship. [/QUOTE]
Why would anyone post on a website dedicated to a band that has been dead since 1991? Why don't we all just log off and forget it?
Fan worship? Me? Are you some kind of a prat? No answers necessary.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Tero wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]inu-liger wrote: [/QUOTENAME]No wonder QOL'ers are made fun of so much here. You guys are really idiotic.[/QUOTE]
And of course QZ'ers are equally despised on other message boards.
Does that mean this place is more intelligent or better in any other way? I don't think so.
QOL might have more of the new and enthusiastic fans who have been drawn in by the website address on the latest releases, but almost everyone ends up bitter and negative in a few years regardless of which site they post on. It's only natural with the kind of quality control QP has. ;)
Is QZ the kind of place where I want to spend my free time? Hell no! :P[/QUOTE]
I think that all long term message board users end up bitter and twisted, no matter what the subject matter. QZ is widely known for being a very hostile place though, it's particularly bad here.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fairydandy wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Holly2003 wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fairydandy wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]A Word In Your Ear wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Not a bad idea in trying to get Queen another "well deserved #1" but I think instead of people wasting 99p on a past track. why don't you all wait for the next single from "The Cosmos Rocks" to be released. Go & buy the CD from your local record store & also spend the 99p on the download"
I think most people can spare 99p.
Since Freddie, "Queen + Paul Rodgers" seem to get overlooked on the radio stations, hence the non-chart position of "Say It's Not True" I know most people downloaded this track for Free & the downloads didn't count towards the chart, but the track, was, a bloody good track & should have charted.
Apart from the Die Hard fans of Queen & the Die Hard fans of Paul, most general people won't buy the single unless they here it on the radio.
Save your money, on a past track, spend it on the new release. let's get some airplay. [/QUOTE]
QPR!! No thanks. I like my Queen neat, with no artificial additives.[/QUOTE]
You must hate all their live shows from 1982 onwards then.[/QUOTE]
My, my aren't you clever. I'm learning so much from you.[/QUOTE]
Happy to be of assistance.
I think most people can spare 99p.
Since Freddie, "Queen + Paul Rodgers" seem to get overlooked on the radio stations, hence the non-chart position of "Say It's Not True" I know most people downloaded this track for Free & the downloads didn't count towards the chart, but the track, was, a bloody good track & should have charted.
Apart from the Die Hard fans of Queen & the Die Hard fans of Paul, most general people won't buy the single unless they here it on the radio.
Save your money, on a past track, spend it on the new release. let's get some airplay. [/QUOTE]
QPR!! No thanks. I like my Queen neat, with no artificial additives.[/QUOTE]
You must hate all their live shows from 1982 onwards then.[/QUOTE]
My, my aren't you clever. I'm learning so much from you.[/QUOTE]
Happy to be of assistance.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fairydandy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Blah blah blah blah blah blah[/QUOTE]
I thought you were leaving for good?
Maybe George Lucas can make another Star Wars movie and you can go dress up and hang out at the movie theatre for the next couple months.
I thought you were leaving for good?
Maybe George Lucas can make another Star Wars movie and you can go dress up and hang out at the movie theatre for the next couple months.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Micrówave wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fairydandy wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Blah blah blah blah blah blah[/QUOTE]
I thought you were leaving for good?
Maybe George Lucas can make another Star Wars movie and you can go dress up and hang out at the movie theatre for the next couple months.[/QUOTE]
I am leaving for good. Getting worried that your cosy little life here is under threat from an outsider are we?
It's actually hard to believe that I only came here with a civil request, yet have been treated as if I have committed a murder or something. I have received nothing but abuse and derision for 4 pages now..how proud you must all be.
Well done and thanks for all your help.
Bye.
PS I have never seen Star Wars.
I thought you were leaving for good?
Maybe George Lucas can make another Star Wars movie and you can go dress up and hang out at the movie theatre for the next couple months.[/QUOTE]
I am leaving for good. Getting worried that your cosy little life here is under threat from an outsider are we?
It's actually hard to believe that I only came here with a civil request, yet have been treated as if I have committed a murder or something. I have received nothing but abuse and derision for 4 pages now..how proud you must all be.
Well done and thanks for all your help.
Bye.
PS I have never seen Star Wars.
fairydandy
Bohemian: 225 meaningless posts
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
hey you promised to leave and never return about 10 posts ago....everything you say is bollox
you have attacked me without repsonse for about 24hrs now....give it up child...you also did attack Barbara...
this forum is not bitter, just that people who use their minds to think rather than their arseholes (like you) are sick of being told what is a good idea...when it clearly isn't
and btw - it's Mr Brenski to you, silly child
Bohemian: 225 meaningless posts
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
hey you promised to leave and never return about 10 posts ago....everything you say is bollox
you have attacked me without repsonse for about 24hrs now....give it up child...you also did attack Barbara...
this forum is not bitter, just that people who use their minds to think rather than their arseholes (like you) are sick of being told what is a good idea...when it clearly isn't
and btw - it's Mr Brenski to you, silly child
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Brenski wrote: [/QUOTENAME]fairydandy
Bohemian: 225 meaningless posts
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
hey you promised to leave and never return about 10 posts ago....everything you say is bollox
you have attacked me without repsonse for about 24hrs now....give it up child...you also did attack Barbara...
this forum is not bitter, just that people who use their minds to think rather than their arseholes (like you) are sick of being told what is a good idea...when it clearly isn't
and btw - it's Mr Brenski to you, silly child
[/QUOTE]
I haven't told you that this is a good idea you silly little girl.
"You also did attack Barbara", is that English?
Dimwit.
Bohemian: 225 meaningless posts
+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
hey you promised to leave and never return about 10 posts ago....everything you say is bollox
you have attacked me without repsonse for about 24hrs now....give it up child...you also did attack Barbara...
this forum is not bitter, just that people who use their minds to think rather than their arseholes (like you) are sick of being told what is a good idea...when it clearly isn't
and btw - it's Mr Brenski to you, silly child
[/QUOTE]
I haven't told you that this is a good idea you silly little girl.
"You also did attack Barbara", is that English?
Dimwit.