[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Bad Horsie wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Mr. Greg Brooks, you are well invited to my birthday party.
Cheers,
Hor[/QUOTE]
WHEN IS IT? WILL THE MUSIC BE GOOD? SHALL I BRING A BOTTLE OR TWO?
Thread
Posts in chronological order
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]brENsKi wrote: [/QUOTENAME]the "2 greatest band of alltime" is fast becoming a laughing stock...because they appear to employ tossers who have little regard for anything other than wanking off their own egos on this site...
you don;t get GB's quality of shite on forums of other decent bands....no wonder that queen have little international music-biz credibilty with morons like GB in charge of the crown jewels...i wouldn;t trust the tw*t with a bag of fucking conkers!!!![/QUOTE]
WELL SAID! I CAN'T FAULT THAT. NASTY AS THIS COMMENT IS, I CAN'T HELP BUT THINK I'D LIKE THIS PERSON IF I MET THEM IN A PUB.
CALM DOWN, THOUGH. DON'T BE SO... PERSONAL. BE NICE.
BY THE WAY. I AM NOT 'EMPLOYED'. I HAVE MY OWN COMPANY, AM SELF EMPLOYED. BUT QUEEN IS MY MAIN CLIENT.
GO HAVE SOME BISCUITS AND CURB YOUR NASTINESS A WHILE. OK.
LOVE TO YOU. AND PEACE.
you don;t get GB's quality of shite on forums of other decent bands....no wonder that queen have little international music-biz credibilty with morons like GB in charge of the crown jewels...i wouldn;t trust the tw*t with a bag of fucking conkers!!!![/QUOTE]
WELL SAID! I CAN'T FAULT THAT. NASTY AS THIS COMMENT IS, I CAN'T HELP BUT THINK I'D LIKE THIS PERSON IF I MET THEM IN A PUB.
CALM DOWN, THOUGH. DON'T BE SO... PERSONAL. BE NICE.
BY THE WAY. I AM NOT 'EMPLOYED'. I HAVE MY OWN COMPANY, AM SELF EMPLOYED. BUT QUEEN IS MY MAIN CLIENT.
GO HAVE SOME BISCUITS AND CURB YOUR NASTINESS A WHILE. OK.
LOVE TO YOU. AND PEACE.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Bad Seed wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
THE FACT IS... THEY DON'T LOOK HERE. WHY WOULD THEY? WHAT ON EARTH WOULD THEY WANT TO COME HERE FOR??
[/QUOTE]
Because QPL is a business of which success depends on the consumer, some of the consumer's being the fan's who post here.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's.[/QUOTE]
GB. OH PLEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!!!!!!!
YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's
GOD ALMIGHTY, YOU REALLY ARE SERIOUS.
THEY'VE SOLD 130 MILLION RECORDS, BAD SEED. LONG BEFORE THE MOANZONE MOANERS WERE MOANING AND WHINGING HERE. YOU THINK THEY NEED TO TUNE INTO YOUR WAVELENGTH? THIS WILL BENEFIT THEM SOMEHOW.
OH NO. NO. NO. NO. A MILLION TIMES NO.
WHAT GREAT IDEAS DO YOU IMAGINE RT AND BM STUMBLING ACROSS HERE THEN???????
AND EVEN IF THERE ARE SOME, THEY'D HAVE TO DIG THRU ENDLESS BANAAL AND OFFENSIVE STUFF TO FIND IT.
WOULD YOU, IN ALL HONESTLY, SHOVEL THROUGH A FIELD FULL OF COW DUNG, TO FIND THE TWO GOOD IDEAS THAT MIGHT LURK THERE SOMEWHERE???
NO YOU WOULD NOT.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's
THAT IS VERY VERY VERY FUNNY DEAR PERSON.
DERANGED, MISGUIDED AS HELL, BUT FUNNY.
THE FACT IS... THEY DON'T LOOK HERE. WHY WOULD THEY? WHAT ON EARTH WOULD THEY WANT TO COME HERE FOR??
[/QUOTE]
Because QPL is a business of which success depends on the consumer, some of the consumer's being the fan's who post here.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's.[/QUOTE]
GB. OH PLEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!!!!!!!
YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's
GOD ALMIGHTY, YOU REALLY ARE SERIOUS.
THEY'VE SOLD 130 MILLION RECORDS, BAD SEED. LONG BEFORE THE MOANZONE MOANERS WERE MOANING AND WHINGING HERE. YOU THINK THEY NEED TO TUNE INTO YOUR WAVELENGTH? THIS WILL BENEFIT THEM SOMEHOW.
OH NO. NO. NO. NO. A MILLION TIMES NO.
WHAT GREAT IDEAS DO YOU IMAGINE RT AND BM STUMBLING ACROSS HERE THEN???????
AND EVEN IF THERE ARE SOME, THEY'D HAVE TO DIG THRU ENDLESS BANAAL AND OFFENSIVE STUFF TO FIND IT.
WOULD YOU, IN ALL HONESTLY, SHOVEL THROUGH A FIELD FULL OF COW DUNG, TO FIND THE TWO GOOD IDEAS THAT MIGHT LURK THERE SOMEWHERE???
NO YOU WOULD NOT.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's
THAT IS VERY VERY VERY FUNNY DEAR PERSON.
DERANGED, MISGUIDED AS HELL, BUT FUNNY.
Guys, something tells me we've struck a nerve.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Bad Seed wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
THE FACT IS... THEY DON'T LOOK HERE. WHY WOULD THEY? WHAT ON EARTH WOULD THEY WANT TO COME HERE FOR??
[/QUOTE]
Because QPL is a business of which success depends on the consumer, some of the consumer's being the fan's who post here.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's.[/QUOTE]
GB. OH PLEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!!!!!!!
YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's
GOD ALMIGHTY, YOU REALLY ARE SERIOUS.
THEY'VE SOLD 130 MILLION RECORDS, BAD SEED. LONG BEFORE THE MOANZONE MOANERS WERE MOANING AND WHINGING HERE. YOU THINK THEY NEED TO TUNE INTO YOUR WAVELENGTH? THIS WILL BENEFIT THEM SOMEHOW.
OH NO. NO. NO. NO. A MILLION TIMES NO.
WHAT GREAT IDEAS DO YOU IMAGINE RT AND BM STUMBLING ACROSS HERE THEN???????
AND EVEN IF THERE ARE SOME, THEY'D HAVE TO DIG THRU ENDLESS BANAAL AND OFFENSIVE STUFF TO FIND IT.
WOULD YOU, IN ALL HONESTLY, SHOVEL THROUGH A FIELD FULL OF COW DUNG, TO FIND THE TWO GOOD IDEAS THAT MIGHT LURK THERE SOMEWHERE???
NO YOU WOULD NOT.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's
THAT IS VERY VERY VERY FUNNY DEAR PERSON.
DERANGED, MISGUIDED AS HELL, BUT FUNNY.
[/QUOTE]
Well that proves it. QP Ltd. cares little to nothing about the opinion of the fans, which only leaves one question that I feel the need to ask:
When will the Wembley '86 concert be re-released, and will you include a video of the new Wembley stadium being built in the special features?
THE FACT IS... THEY DON'T LOOK HERE. WHY WOULD THEY? WHAT ON EARTH WOULD THEY WANT TO COME HERE FOR??
[/QUOTE]
Because QPL is a business of which success depends on the consumer, some of the consumer's being the fan's who post here.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's.[/QUOTE]
GB. OH PLEEEEEEEEEEEEZE!!!!!!!
YOU CAN'T BE SERIOUS.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's
GOD ALMIGHTY, YOU REALLY ARE SERIOUS.
THEY'VE SOLD 130 MILLION RECORDS, BAD SEED. LONG BEFORE THE MOANZONE MOANERS WERE MOANING AND WHINGING HERE. YOU THINK THEY NEED TO TUNE INTO YOUR WAVELENGTH? THIS WILL BENEFIT THEM SOMEHOW.
OH NO. NO. NO. NO. A MILLION TIMES NO.
WHAT GREAT IDEAS DO YOU IMAGINE RT AND BM STUMBLING ACROSS HERE THEN???????
AND EVEN IF THERE ARE SOME, THEY'D HAVE TO DIG THRU ENDLESS BANAAL AND OFFENSIVE STUFF TO FIND IT.
WOULD YOU, IN ALL HONESTLY, SHOVEL THROUGH A FIELD FULL OF COW DUNG, TO FIND THE TWO GOOD IDEAS THAT MIGHT LURK THERE SOMEWHERE???
NO YOU WOULD NOT.
If I were in Brian, Roger or Jim's position I would certainly be looking here for feedback and idea's
THAT IS VERY VERY VERY FUNNY DEAR PERSON.
DERANGED, MISGUIDED AS HELL, BUT FUNNY.
[/QUOTE]
Well that proves it. QP Ltd. cares little to nothing about the opinion of the fans, which only leaves one question that I feel the need to ask:
When will the Wembley '86 concert be re-released, and will you include a video of the new Wembley stadium being built in the special features?
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Steven wrote: [/QUOTENAME]How can Queen's very own archivist, who is supposed to honorably represent the band, be such an annoying jerk on a Queen fan site? This thread, in particular, is very incoherent. This brings me to my skepticism. Is this truly the real and definitive Greg Brooks? Or is it possible, just possible, that this is just a fake trying to get everybody excited? I strongly encourage everybody to take a step back for a moment and analyze this very carefully. If anyone can offer any form of evidence to prove that he is the real deal, please do! Until then, I'm not convinced. I haven't been for the longest time.[/QUOTE]
I THINK I'M ME ALRIGHT. I'M CONVINCED I'M ME, STEVEY. I'VE HAD A CLOSE LOOK AND I'M NOT AN IMPOSTER.
HANG ON! WAIT! I'VE JUST FOUND A BIRTH MARK ON MY HAND WHICH WASN'T THERE THIS MORNING.
NO.... WAIT! IT'S JUST FILTH. SOME GRAVY. NOT A BIRTH MARK.
IT TRULY IS ME.
HOOOORAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA![/QUOTE]
Just because you tell us you're Greg Brooks doesn't necessarily mean you're Greg Brooks.
I THINK I'M ME ALRIGHT. I'M CONVINCED I'M ME, STEVEY. I'VE HAD A CLOSE LOOK AND I'M NOT AN IMPOSTER.
HANG ON! WAIT! I'VE JUST FOUND A BIRTH MARK ON MY HAND WHICH WASN'T THERE THIS MORNING.
NO.... WAIT! IT'S JUST FILTH. SOME GRAVY. NOT A BIRTH MARK.
IT TRULY IS ME.
HOOOORAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA![/QUOTE]
Just because you tell us you're Greg Brooks doesn't necessarily mean you're Greg Brooks.
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Steven wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Queen Archivist wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Steven wrote: [/QUOTENAME]How can Queen's very own archivist, who is supposed to honorably represent the band, be such an annoying jerk on a Queen fan site? This thread, in particular, is very incoherent. This brings me to my skepticism. Is this truly the real and definitive Greg Brooks? Or is it possible, just possible, that this is just a fake trying to get everybody excited? I strongly encourage everybody to take a step back for a moment and analyze this very carefully. If anyone can offer any form of evidence to prove that he is the real deal, please do! Until then, I'm not convinced. I haven't been for the longest time.[/QUOTE]
I THINK I'M ME ALRIGHT. I'M CONVINCED I'M ME, STEVEY. I'VE HAD A CLOSE LOOK AND I'M NOT AN IMPOSTER.
HANG ON! WAIT! I'VE JUST FOUND A BIRTH MARK ON MY HAND WHICH WASN'T THERE THIS MORNING.
NO.... WAIT! IT'S JUST FILTH. SOME GRAVY. NOT A BIRTH MARK.
IT TRULY IS ME.
HOOOORAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA![/QUOTE]
Just because you tell us you're Greg Brooks doesn't necessarily mean you're Greg Brooks. [/QUOTE]
Oh! Yes. Good point. You're right. I'm not really me Stevo.
I THINK I'M ME ALRIGHT. I'M CONVINCED I'M ME, STEVEY. I'VE HAD A CLOSE LOOK AND I'M NOT AN IMPOSTER.
HANG ON! WAIT! I'VE JUST FOUND A BIRTH MARK ON MY HAND WHICH WASN'T THERE THIS MORNING.
NO.... WAIT! IT'S JUST FILTH. SOME GRAVY. NOT A BIRTH MARK.
IT TRULY IS ME.
HOOOORAAAAAAAAAAAAAAA![/QUOTE]
Just because you tell us you're Greg Brooks doesn't necessarily mean you're Greg Brooks. [/QUOTE]
Oh! Yes. Good point. You're right. I'm not really me Stevo.
Dear Mr Archivist
Thank you so much for getting back in touch so soon. I think that if I were to respond in a similar fashion, things might get a bit confusing so I'll just answer the points you have raised in caps and you (or anyone else that's interested) can refer back to the original post to read the points that you were addressing. Okay, here goes.
GB: FATTY, I WAS NOT REMOTELY OFFENDED. THAT'S THE FIRST THING TO SAY. I MERELY POINTED OUT THAT PEOPLE LIKE YOU DO EXIST, AND DO SAY NASTY THINGS... AND YOU DO. YOU AND YOUR WORDS COMPLETELY ENDORSED THE EXACT POINT I WAS MAKING. IT IS YOUR ASSUMPTION THAT I AM OFFENDED. I HONESTLY AM NOT. YOU'RE ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION AND SENSE OF HUMOUR. I PERSONALLY THINK IT'S JUST A VERY STRANGE THING TO SEE ON A SITE THAT'S SUPPOSEDLY (MOST PEOPLE WOULD REASONABLY IMAGINE) INTENDED TO ENCOMPASS REAL QUEEN FANS.
Am I right in thinking that the reason you dragged my name into an argument, I had nothing whatsoever to do with, was not that you took offence at my post but that you were pointing out that people like me exist? "People like me" being people who say nasty things. Given the fact that in your last post you called me, among other things, a faceless coward and a turd that needs to be put out of it's misery, perhaps we should amend that phrase to "people like us".
As for this site being intended for real Queen fans, I'll make a deal with you. If you can provide me with the definition of a real Queen fan and you can convince Richard Orchard to adopt a policy of excluding anyone who fails to come up to those standards, I'll cancel my account and never darken Queenzone's door again.
YOUR PUERILE AND HOMOPHOBIC ATTEMPT AT A JOKE, TO MY MIND, HAS NO PLACE ON A SITE LIKE THIS, OR ANYWHERE... WHERE FOR EXAMPLE A YOUNGSTER MIGHT FIND SUCH THINGS AS YOU TALKING ABOUT FREDDIE, AND COCK, FAGGOT, POOF, AND POO BAY, AND ALL THOSE OTHER HORRIBLE THINGS.
My puerile and homophobic attempts at jokes have been around since 2001 and are generally well recieved. And if by some chance a youngster becomes mentally scarred after reading one of my posts all I have to say is fuck them! If they can't handle a rude word or three, they're never going to make it in the big bad world anyway.
I'M NOT OFFENDED, CHUM, JUST A BIT DISAPPOINTED. YOU ARE A QUEEN FAN????? IF SO, HOW YOU CAN YOU WRITE THAT SHIT?
I ought to point out that I'm no longer a Queen fan but I was writing the same kind of shit while I was a fan so go figure, eh?
I'M NOT OFFENDED. AND I REALISED IT WAS A JOKE.
BUT CAN'T YOU SEE THAT IT WAS REALLY RATHER NASTY AND REPULSIVE? OR DO YOU NEED OTHERS TO POINT THAT OUT FOR YOU?
Of course I realised it was nasty and repulsive. If I could have been bothered, I would have gone on to use other homosexual references such as "pillow biter", "shit-stabber", "fudge-packer", "uphill gardener". The list goes on and on with each reference more nasty and repulsive than the last. But the joke was aimed at the morons who try to lure the more sensitive fans with the same old "Was Freddie Gay?" thread. What tickles me more than anything is else is the fact that almost everyone apart from yourself gets the joke.
I BET HE/SHE REALLY ENJOYED YOUR DISCUSTING AND BELITTLING AND DEGRADING 'VIEW' VOCABULARY.
This is the response you gave to my remark about having a best friend that is gay...probably. I can assure you that he/she took no offence because he/she dosen't actually exist. He/she was nothing more than a fictional character intended to be the butt of a joke that wasn't exactly subtle in the first place. Your gullability is an issue you really should work on.
I'M BETTING YOU ARE A TEENAGER.
Okay I'll take that bet. Now where do I collect my winnings
YOU WILL ONE DAY REALISE HOW DEGRADING AND UNNECESSARY YOUR CHOICE OF WORDS WAS FOR YOUR... 'JOKE'.
Perhaps one day, you'll understand the basic structure of a 'joke'.
LIKE ANYONE IS SUPPOSED TO KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT'S YOU!!!!!!!!!!
STUPID THING TO SAY. EVERYONE KNOWS VERY WELL WHO I AM ON THIS SITE. 'FATTY' MEANS NOTHING TO ME. ANYWAY, THAT WASN'T THE REAL POINT. IT WASN'T THE IMPORTANT THING I FOCUSSED ON.
These are nothing more than examples of a dangerously over-inflated ego and have little to do with the discussion in hand.
OK, NOT A COWARD THEN, SCOTT. BUT YOU STILL COME ACROSS AS HOMOPHOBIC WITH YOUR NASTY LITTLE JOKE THAT WASN'Y A JOKE - JUST AN ILLUSTRATION OF HOW YOUR MIND WORKS.
NO, I STILL THINK I'D RATHER AVOID YOU... HAVING HEARD A LITTLE OF HOW YOUR MIND TICKS...
LET'S REMIND EVERYONE OF HOW 'NOT' HONOPHOBIC YOU ARE (OR MIGHT BE PERCEIVED) WITH YOUR REALLY FUNNY JOKE...
SCOTT... ASK YOUR PROBABLY GAY FRIEND HOW FUNNY AND SENSITIVE AND MATURE HE/SHE THINKS YOUR JOKE IS.
Believe me Mr Archivist, If there was anything I could do to convince you that I am in no way homophobic.... I still wouldn't bother. Your opinion of me gives me no more concern than I would give to a cloudy day. I had hoped that this argument/discussion or whatever you care to call it might provide a bit of sport but I've had more entertaining arguments with Jake Britt.
You start a thread, the point of which is to demonstrate your right to express an opinion that might not be shared by everyone then use a joke I made as an example of the kind of opinions that ought to be banned. It seems to me that you have made a complete tit of yourself and that pesky ego of yours wont let you leave it.
Just so you know, I'm up for taking this discussion further but I honestly don't think you've got the bus fares for it.
Your good pal
fatty
Thank you so much for getting back in touch so soon. I think that if I were to respond in a similar fashion, things might get a bit confusing so I'll just answer the points you have raised in caps and you (or anyone else that's interested) can refer back to the original post to read the points that you were addressing. Okay, here goes.
GB: FATTY, I WAS NOT REMOTELY OFFENDED. THAT'S THE FIRST THING TO SAY. I MERELY POINTED OUT THAT PEOPLE LIKE YOU DO EXIST, AND DO SAY NASTY THINGS... AND YOU DO. YOU AND YOUR WORDS COMPLETELY ENDORSED THE EXACT POINT I WAS MAKING. IT IS YOUR ASSUMPTION THAT I AM OFFENDED. I HONESTLY AM NOT. YOU'RE ENTITLED TO YOUR OPINION AND SENSE OF HUMOUR. I PERSONALLY THINK IT'S JUST A VERY STRANGE THING TO SEE ON A SITE THAT'S SUPPOSEDLY (MOST PEOPLE WOULD REASONABLY IMAGINE) INTENDED TO ENCOMPASS REAL QUEEN FANS.
Am I right in thinking that the reason you dragged my name into an argument, I had nothing whatsoever to do with, was not that you took offence at my post but that you were pointing out that people like me exist? "People like me" being people who say nasty things. Given the fact that in your last post you called me, among other things, a faceless coward and a turd that needs to be put out of it's misery, perhaps we should amend that phrase to "people like us".
As for this site being intended for real Queen fans, I'll make a deal with you. If you can provide me with the definition of a real Queen fan and you can convince Richard Orchard to adopt a policy of excluding anyone who fails to come up to those standards, I'll cancel my account and never darken Queenzone's door again.
YOUR PUERILE AND HOMOPHOBIC ATTEMPT AT A JOKE, TO MY MIND, HAS NO PLACE ON A SITE LIKE THIS, OR ANYWHERE... WHERE FOR EXAMPLE A YOUNGSTER MIGHT FIND SUCH THINGS AS YOU TALKING ABOUT FREDDIE, AND COCK, FAGGOT, POOF, AND POO BAY, AND ALL THOSE OTHER HORRIBLE THINGS.
My puerile and homophobic attempts at jokes have been around since 2001 and are generally well recieved. And if by some chance a youngster becomes mentally scarred after reading one of my posts all I have to say is fuck them! If they can't handle a rude word or three, they're never going to make it in the big bad world anyway.
I'M NOT OFFENDED, CHUM, JUST A BIT DISAPPOINTED. YOU ARE A QUEEN FAN????? IF SO, HOW YOU CAN YOU WRITE THAT SHIT?
I ought to point out that I'm no longer a Queen fan but I was writing the same kind of shit while I was a fan so go figure, eh?
I'M NOT OFFENDED. AND I REALISED IT WAS A JOKE.
BUT CAN'T YOU SEE THAT IT WAS REALLY RATHER NASTY AND REPULSIVE? OR DO YOU NEED OTHERS TO POINT THAT OUT FOR YOU?
Of course I realised it was nasty and repulsive. If I could have been bothered, I would have gone on to use other homosexual references such as "pillow biter", "shit-stabber", "fudge-packer", "uphill gardener". The list goes on and on with each reference more nasty and repulsive than the last. But the joke was aimed at the morons who try to lure the more sensitive fans with the same old "Was Freddie Gay?" thread. What tickles me more than anything is else is the fact that almost everyone apart from yourself gets the joke.
I BET HE/SHE REALLY ENJOYED YOUR DISCUSTING AND BELITTLING AND DEGRADING 'VIEW' VOCABULARY.
This is the response you gave to my remark about having a best friend that is gay...probably. I can assure you that he/she took no offence because he/she dosen't actually exist. He/she was nothing more than a fictional character intended to be the butt of a joke that wasn't exactly subtle in the first place. Your gullability is an issue you really should work on.
I'M BETTING YOU ARE A TEENAGER.
Okay I'll take that bet. Now where do I collect my winnings
YOU WILL ONE DAY REALISE HOW DEGRADING AND UNNECESSARY YOUR CHOICE OF WORDS WAS FOR YOUR... 'JOKE'.
Perhaps one day, you'll understand the basic structure of a 'joke'.
LIKE ANYONE IS SUPPOSED TO KNOW FOR CERTAIN THAT'S YOU!!!!!!!!!!
STUPID THING TO SAY. EVERYONE KNOWS VERY WELL WHO I AM ON THIS SITE. 'FATTY' MEANS NOTHING TO ME. ANYWAY, THAT WASN'T THE REAL POINT. IT WASN'T THE IMPORTANT THING I FOCUSSED ON.
These are nothing more than examples of a dangerously over-inflated ego and have little to do with the discussion in hand.
OK, NOT A COWARD THEN, SCOTT. BUT YOU STILL COME ACROSS AS HOMOPHOBIC WITH YOUR NASTY LITTLE JOKE THAT WASN'Y A JOKE - JUST AN ILLUSTRATION OF HOW YOUR MIND WORKS.
NO, I STILL THINK I'D RATHER AVOID YOU... HAVING HEARD A LITTLE OF HOW YOUR MIND TICKS...
LET'S REMIND EVERYONE OF HOW 'NOT' HONOPHOBIC YOU ARE (OR MIGHT BE PERCEIVED) WITH YOUR REALLY FUNNY JOKE...
SCOTT... ASK YOUR PROBABLY GAY FRIEND HOW FUNNY AND SENSITIVE AND MATURE HE/SHE THINKS YOUR JOKE IS.
Believe me Mr Archivist, If there was anything I could do to convince you that I am in no way homophobic.... I still wouldn't bother. Your opinion of me gives me no more concern than I would give to a cloudy day. I had hoped that this argument/discussion or whatever you care to call it might provide a bit of sport but I've had more entertaining arguments with Jake Britt.
You start a thread, the point of which is to demonstrate your right to express an opinion that might not be shared by everyone then use a joke I made as an example of the kind of opinions that ought to be banned. It seems to me that you have made a complete tit of yourself and that pesky ego of yours wont let you leave it.
Just so you know, I'm up for taking this discussion further but I honestly don't think you've got the bus fares for it.
Your good pal
fatty
[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]fatty wrote: [/QUOTENAME]
And if by some chance a youngster becomes mentally scarred after reading one of my posts all I have to say is fuck them! If they can't handle a rude word or three, they're never going to make it in the big bad world anyway.
[/QUOTE]
And if by some chance a youngster becomes mentally scarred after reading one of my posts all I have to say is fuck them! If they can't handle a rude word or three, they're never going to make it in the big bad world anyway.
[/QUOTE]
Dear Fatty,
Say something REALLY nice about me. Go on!!!! I dare you.
Something complimentary, you little tease.
Say something REALLY nice about me. Go on!!!! I dare you.
Something complimentary, you little tease.
Greg, are you SURE you're not really Kevin Pietersen in disguise?
Aren't you supposed to be plotting the imminent demise of South Africa whilst heralding a new dawn for English Cricket and an assault on the Aussies next summer?
Surely you can't have this much time on your hands given that you've only been in the job 12 hours?
Please, do us a favour; get back to the coalface and chip away there like a good little boy.
Aren't you supposed to be plotting the imminent demise of South Africa whilst heralding a new dawn for English Cricket and an assault on the Aussies next summer?
Surely you can't have this much time on your hands given that you've only been in the job 12 hours?
Please, do us a favour; get back to the coalface and chip away there like a good little boy.