[QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Ray D O'Gaga wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]Treasure Moment wrote: [/QUOTENAME][QUOTE][QUOTENAME]primavera wrote: [/QUOTENAME]Queen or no Queen... tired of reading the posts... would the discussion change anything?
It's good to see that Brian and Roger (really BRILLIANT musicians) still go on. I had no chance of hearing Queen music life when Freddie was alive and I'm really grateful to them for giving me this pleasure now...
Or should they have calle themselves something like 'Queen-Freddie+Paul Rodgers' to keep everybody satisfied????? [/QUOTE]
no, what they should have done is to NOT use the Queen name at all.[/QUOTE]
Why don't you use your genius to build a time machine and then go back and put a condom on everybody that fucked Freddie between 1980 and 1986, then history will be changed and we won't have to have this discussion. You're obviously such a smart guy, I'm sure it'll be a snap.[/QUOTE]
what does that have to do with anything? im just saying that the name shouldnt be used anymore.
Thread
Posts in chronological order
Wow.. veeery polite replies here... and very smart ones...
If they were touring under any other name, they would not be playing the music of Queen. I'd definitely be glad to hear any of Brian's and Roger's stuff as well... but Queen is Queen.
What I really loathe about the whole situation is that people are saying one and the same thing again and again.
Brian and Roger are great musicians... I enjoyed the shows I saw and I'm positive about the album. And I do not think that means betraying the memory of Freddie.
If they were touring under any other name, they would not be playing the music of Queen. I'd definitely be glad to hear any of Brian's and Roger's stuff as well... but Queen is Queen.
What I really loathe about the whole situation is that people are saying one and the same thing again and again.
Brian and Roger are great musicians... I enjoyed the shows I saw and I'm positive about the album. And I do not think that means betraying the memory of Freddie.